0
Journal of Medical Devices | Volume 1 | Issue 2 | Research Paper
RESEARCH PAPERS

A Theoretical and Experimental Investigation of Lateral Deformations in a Unilateral External Fixator

[+] Author and Article Information
Kerem Ün

Department of Electrical-Electronic Engineering, University of Çukurova, Adana 01330, Turkeykeremun@cu.edu.tr

İbrahim D. Akçalı

Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Çukurova, Adana 01330, Turkey

Mahir Gülşen

Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, University of Çukurova, Adana 01330, Turkey

J. Med. Devices 1(2), 165-172 (Sep 11, 2006) (8 pages) doi:10.1115/1.2735972 History: Received February 16, 2006; Revised September 11, 2006
Article
References
Figures
Tables

The objective of this work is to set up, validate, and analyze a theoretical model of an external fixator for its deformation characteristics in order to draw reliable conclusions relevant to the design and effective clinical implementation of such medical devices. External fixators are mechanical devices widely used in the treatment of fractured bones and correction of limb deformities. Lateral deformation at the fracture site is known to delay bone healing, and investigation of lateral deformation characteristics of such devices experiencing forces acting perpendicular to the bone axis is important from the standpoint of their design as well as their clinical effectiveness. A mathematical model of a three-dimensional (3D) unilateral fixator with multipin fragment attachments has been developed using Castigliano’s method. The relative lateral deformations of the fragment ends at the fracture site induced by loads applied perpendicular to bone axes are calculated with the model. The model has been subjected to experimental verification for a uniplanar unilateral external fixator under comparable conditions with the theory. It has been found out that the effects of fixator size, shape, and geometry on the level of relative lateral displacement of the fracture site are similar in both the theoretical and experimental models. Stiffness is a maximum if the force is applied in the same plane as the proximal pin plane. Placing the distal pin group at a 90deg position relative to the proximal pin plane has been observed to increase the stiffness about 10%. In loading directions perpendicular to proximal the pin plane, stiffness is minimum. The angle difference between the load direction and the resulting displacement direction follows a sinusoidal pattern with an amplitude of 10deg for loading angles in the 0–180deg range. Selecting the distance of proximal pins to the fracture site smaller than the distance of distal pins to the fracture site has been found to decrease relative lateral deformation. The model and the experiment have simultaneously demonstrated that lower values of effective pin lengths and higher values of pin connector lengths lead to higher stiffness. Increasing the number of pins also contributes to the higher values of fixator stiffness.
FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2007 by American Society of Mechanical Engineers
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

1
Ilizarov, G. A., 1992, "Transosseous Osteosynthesis", Springer, Berlin, Germany, pp. 63–136.
2
Velazquez, R. J., Bell, D. F., Armstrong, P. F., Babyn, P., and Tibshirani, R., 1993, “Complications of Use of Ilizarov Technique in the Correction of Limb Deformities in Children,” J. Bone Jt. Surg., Am. Vol., 75 , pp. 1148–1156.
3
Paley, D., 2002, "Principles of Deformity Correction", Springer, Berlin, Germany, pp. 291–410.
4
Watson, M. A., Mathias, K. J., and Maffuli, N., 2000, “External Ring Fixators: An Overview,” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., Part H: J. Eng. Med.  [CrossRef], 214 , pp. 459–470.
5
Behrens, F., Allgower, M., Fernandez, D. L., 1991, “External Fixation,” "Manual of Internal Fixation. Techniques Recommended by the AO-ASIF Group", M.E.Müller, M.Allgower, R.Schneider, and H.Willenegger, eds., Springer, New York, p. 367.
6
Burny, F., Bourgouis, R., and Donkerwolcke, M., 1982, “Elastic External Fixation: A Biomechanical Study of Half Frame,” "Concepts in External Fixation", D.Seligson, and M.H.Pope, eds., Grune Stratton, New York, pp. 66–77.
7
Goodship, A. E., and Kenwright, J., 1985, “The Influence of Induced Micro-Movement on the Healing of Experimental Tibia Fractures,” J. Bone Jt. Surg., Br. Vol., 67 , pp. 650–655.
8
Kenwright, J., and Goodship, A. E., 1989, “Controlled Mechanical Stimulation in the Treatment of Tibial Fractures,” Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res., 241 , pp. 36–47.
9
De Bastiani, G., Aldegheri, R., and Renzi Brivio, L., 1984, “The Treatment of Fractures with a Dynamic Axial Fixator,” J. Bone Jt. Surg., Br. Vol., 66 , pp. 538–545.
10
De Bastiani, G., Aldegheri, R., Renzi Brivio, L., and Trivella, F., 1987, “Limb Lengthening by Callus Distraction (Callotasis),” J. Pediatr. Orthop., 7 , pp. 129–134.
11
Grill, F., 1989, “Correction of Complicated Extremity Deformities by External Fixation,” Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res., 241 , pp. 166–176.
12
Aldegheri, R., Renzi Brivio, L., and Agostini, S., 1989, “Callotasis Method of Limb Lengthening,” Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res., 241 , pp. 137–145.
13
Aronson, J., and Tursky, E. A., 1992, “External Fixation of Femur Fractures in Children,” J. Pediatr. Orthop., 12 , pp. 157–163.
14
Reff, R. B., 1984, “The Use of External Fixation Devices in the Management of Severe Lower Extremity Trauma and Pelvic Injuries in Children,” Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res., 188 , pp. 21–33.
15
Stanitski, D. F., Srivastava, P., and Stanitski, C. L., 1998, “Correction of Proximal Tibial Deformities in Adolescents using the T-Garches External Fixator,” J. Pediatr. Orthop., 18 , pp. 512–517.
16
Alonso, J., Geissler, W., and Hughes, J. L., 1989, “External Fixation of Femoral Fractures: Indications and Limitations,” Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res., 241 , pp. 83–88.
17
Chao, E. Y. S., and Pope, M. H., 1982, “The Mechanical Basis of External Fixation,” "Concepts in External Fixation", D.Seligson and M.H.Pope, eds., Grune Stratton, New York, pp. 13–39.
18
Broekhuizen, A. H., 2000, “The Stabilitiy of Orthofix External Fixation: A Comparative Evaluation,” "Orthofix External Fixaton in Trauma and Orthopaedics", G.De Bastiani, A.G.Apley, and A.Goldberg, eds., Springer, London, pp. 71–76.
19
Behrens, F., and Johnson, W., 1989, “Unilateral External Fixation: Methods to Increase and Reduce Frame Stiffness,” Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res., 241 , pp. 48–56.
20
Briggs, B. T., and Chao, E. Y. S., 1982, “The Mechanical Performance of the Standard Hoffmann-Vidal External Fixation Apparatus,” J. Bone Jt. Surg., Am. Vol., 64 , pp. 566–573.
21
Draper, E. R. C., Strachan, R. K., Hughes, S. P. F., Nichol, A. C., and Paul, J. P., 1997, “Design and Performance of an Experimental External Fixator with Variable Axial Stiffness and a Compressive Force Transducer,” Med. Eng. Phys.  [CrossRef], 19 , pp. 690–695.
22
Goh, J., Thambyah, A., Noor Ghani, A., and Bose, K., 1997, “Evaluation of a Simple and Low-Cost External Fixator,” Injury, 28 , pp. 29–34.
23
Sladicka, S., and Duffin, S. R., 1998, “A Biomechanical Strength Comparison of External Fixators,” J. Trauma: Inj., Infect., Crit. Care, 44 , pp. 965–969.
24
Matsuura, M., Lounici, S., Inoue, N., Walulik, S., and Chao, E. Y. S., 2003, “Assessment of External Fixator Reusability Using Load- and Cycle-Dependent Tests,” Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res., 476 , pp. 275–281.
25
Yang, L., Nayagam, S., and Saleh, M., 2003, “Stiffness Characteristics and Inter-Fragmentary Displacements with Different Hybrid External Fixators,” Clin. Biomech., 18 , pp. 166–172.
26
Dirschl, D. R., and Obremskey, W. T., 2002, “Mechanical Strength and Wear of Used EBI External Fixators,” Orthopedics, 25 , pp. 1059–1062.
27
Johnson, W. D., and Fischer, D. A., 1983, “Skeletal Stabilization with a Multiplane External Fixation Device: Biomechanical Evaluation and Finite Element Model,” Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res., 180 , pp. 34–43.
28
Shahar, R., 2000, “Relative Stiffness and Stress of Type I and Type II External Fixators: Acrylic Versus Stainless-Steel Connecting Bars A Theoretical Approach,” Vet. Surg., 29 , pp. 59–69.
29
Lauer, S. K., Aron, D. N., and Evans, M. D., 2000, “Finite Element Method Evaluation: Articulations and Diagonals in an 8-pin Type 1B External Skeletal Fixator,” Vet. Surg., 29 , pp. 28–37.
30
Radke, H., Aron, D. N., Applewhite, A., and Zhang, G., 2006, “Biomechanical Analysis of Unilateral External Skeletal Fixators Combined with IM-Pin and Without IM-Pin Using Finite-Element Method,” Vet. Surg., 35 , pp. 15–23.
31
Koo, T. K., Chao, E. Y., and Mak, A. F., 2005, “Fixation Stiffness of Dynafix Uilateral External Fixator in Neutral and Non-neutral Configurations,” Biomed. Mater. Eng., 15 , pp. 433–444.
32
Augat, A., Burger, J., Schorlemmer, S., Peraus, M., Henke, T., and Claes, L., 2003, “Shear Movement at the Fracture Site Delays Healing in Diaphyseal Fracture Model,” J. Orthop. Res.  [CrossRef], 21 , pp. 1011–1017.
33
Langhaar, H. L., 1962, "Energy Methods in Applied Mechanics", Chap. 4, Wiley, New York.
34
Shigley, J. E., 1986, "Mechanical Engineering Design", 1st Metric ed., McGraw–Hill, New York, pp. 113–116.
35
Popov, E. P., 1968, "Introduction to Mechanics of Solids", Prentice–Hall, Engelwood Cliffs, N.J., Chap. 13.
36
Beer, F. P., and Johnston, E. R., 1987, "Mechanics of Materials", SI Metric ed., McGraw–Hill, New York, Chap. 10.
37
Hartog, J. P. D., 1987, "Advanced Strength of Materials", Dover, New York, Chap. 7.
38
Meirovitch, L., 1967, "Analytical Methods in Vibrations", Macmillan, London, UK, Chap. 1.
39
Pugh, K. J., Wolinsky, P. R., Dawson, J. M., and Stahlman, G. C., 1999, “The Biomechanics of Hybrid External Fixation,” J. Orthop. Trauma, 13 , pp. 20–26.
40
Pugh, K. J., Wolinsky, P. R., Pienkowski, D., Banit, D., and Dawson, J. M., 1999, “Comparative Biomechanics of Hybrid External Fixation,” J. Orthop. Trauma, 13 , pp. 418–425.
41
Drijber, F. L. I. P., Finlay, J. B., and Dempsey, A. J., 1992, “Evaluation of Linear Finite-Element Analysis Models’ Assumptions for External Fixation Devices,” J. Biomech.  [CrossRef], 25 , pp. 849–855.
42
Gülşen, M., Akçalı, İ. D., Tosun, H., and Tan, İ., 1993, “Theoretical and Experimental Analysis of the Multi-Half-Pin Spatial External Fixation System,” "Proceedings of the 6th General Meeting of Societe Internationale de Chirurgie Ortopedique et de Traumatologie", Seoul, S. Korea, 28 August–3 September 1993, p. 252.
43
Gülşen, M., Akçalı, İ. D., and Mutlu, H., 1991, “Analysis of the Mechanical Behavior of a Spatial Half-Frame External Fixator,” "Proceedings of the 12th National Congress of Orthopaedics and Traumatology", Kusadasi, Turkey (in Turkish), 21–24 April 1991, pp. 464–468.
44
Mutlu, H., Akçalı, İ. D., Gülşen, M., and Tosun, H., 1994, “An Analytical and Experimental Investigation of Lateral Deformations of an External Fixator,” "Prooceedings of the 6th International Congress of Machine Design and Manufacturing", Ankara, Turkey (in Turkish), 21–23 September 1996, pp. 553–563.
45
Kim, Y. H., Inoue, N., and Chao, E. Y. S., 2002, “Kinematic Simulation of Fracture Reduction and Bone Deformity Correction Under Unilateral External Fixation,” J. Biomech.  [CrossRef], 35 , pp. 1047–1058.
46
Mutlu, H., Akçalı, İ. D., and Gülşen, M., 2006, “A Mathematical Model for the Use of a Gough-Stewart Platform Mechanism as a Fixator,” J. Eng. Math.  [CrossRef], 54 , pp. 119–143.

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
+Experimental setup with the fixator and the PVC pipe fragments
View Large  |  Save Figure  |  Download Slide (.ppt)
Experimental setup with the fixator and the PVC pipe fragments
Figure 3

Experimental setup with the fixator and the PVC pipe fragments

Grahic Jump Location
+The y and z components (Vy and Vz, respectively) of lateral displacement as determined from theory plotted for different α values. The magnitude of the lateral displacement is the distance from the (Vy=0,Vz=0) point.
View Large  |  Save Figure  |  Download Slide (.ppt)
The y and z components (Vy and Vz, respectively) of lateral displacement as determined from theory plotted for different α values. The magnitude of the lateral displacement is the distance from the (Vy=0,Vz=0) point.
Figure 4

The y and z components (Vy and Vz, respectively) of lateral displacement as determined from theory plotted for different α values. The magnitude of the lateral displacement is the distance from the (Vy=0,Vz=0) point.

Grahic Jump Location
+Spring model of the fixator system
View Large  |  Save Figure  |  Download Slide (.ppt)
Spring model of the fixator system
Figure 2

Spring model of the fixator system

Grahic Jump Location
+Depiction of the physical model. Geometric parameters are defined and the various parts of the fixator system are labeled with numbers
View Large  |  Save Figure  |  Download Slide (.ppt)
Depiction of the physical model. Geometric parameters are defined and the various parts of the fixator system are labeled with numbers
Figure 1

Depiction of the physical model. Geometric parameters are defined and the various parts of the fixator system are labeled with numbers

Grahic Jump Location
+The y and z components (Vy and Vz, respectively) of lateral displacement as determined from theory (solid line) and experiment (dots) plotted at various loading angles ϕ. The magnitude of the lateral displacement is the distance from the (Vy=0,Vz=0) point.
View Large  |  Save Figure  |  Download Slide (.ppt)
The y and z components (Vy and Vz, respectively) of lateral displacement as determined from theory (solid line) and experiment (dots) plotted at various loading angles ϕ. The magnitude of the lateral displacement is the distance from the (Vy=0,Vz=0) point.
Figure 5

The y and z components (Vy and Vz, respectively) of lateral displacement as determined from theory (solid line) and experiment (dots) plotted at various loading angles ϕ. The magnitude of the lateral displacement is the distance from the (Vy=0,Vz=0) point.

Grahic Jump Location
+Phase shift (the angle between loading ϕ and displacement vector β) as a function of the loading angle ϕ
View Large  |  Save Figure  |  Download Slide (.ppt)
Phase shift (the angle between loading ϕ and displacement vector β) as a function of the loading angle ϕ
Figure 6

Phase shift (the angle between loading ϕ and displacement vector β) as a function of the loading angle ϕ

Grahic Jump Location
+Percent change with respect to the reference value of lateral deformation as a function of parameter b (the distance between the fracture site and the proximal fixator pins)
View Large  |  Save Figure  |  Download Slide (.ppt)
Percent change with respect to the reference value of lateral deformation as a function of parameter b (the distance between the fracture site and the proximal fixator pins)
Figure 7

Percent change with respect to the reference value of lateral deformation as a function of parameter b (the distance between the fracture site and the proximal fixator pins)

Grahic Jump Location
+Percent change with respect to the reference value of lateral deformation as a function of parameter c (the distance between the fracture site and the distal fixator pins)
View Large  |  Save Figure  |  Download Slide (.ppt)
Percent change with respect to the reference value of lateral deformation as a function of parameter c (the distance between the fracture site and the distal fixator pins)
Figure 8

Percent change with respect to the reference value of lateral deformation as a function of parameter c (the distance between the fracture site and the distal fixator pins)

Grahic Jump Location
+Percent change with respect to the reference value of lateral deformation as a function of parameter d (the distance between force application point and the distal fixator pins)
View Large  |  Save Figure  |  Download Slide (.ppt)
Percent change with respect to the reference value of lateral deformation as a function of parameter d (the distance between force application point and the distal fixator pins)
Figure 9

Percent change with respect to the reference value of lateral deformation as a function of parameter d (the distance between force application point and the distal fixator pins)

Grahic Jump Location
+Percent change with respect to the reference value of lateral deformation as a function of parameter f (effective pin length)
View Large  |  Save Figure  |  Download Slide (.ppt)
Percent change with respect to the reference value of lateral deformation as a function of parameter f (effective pin length)
Figure 10

Percent change with respect to the reference value of lateral deformation as a function of parameter f (effective pin length)

Grahic Jump Location
+Percent change with respect to the reference value of lateral deformation as a function of parameter r (the horizontal length of the connectors)
View Large  |  Save Figure  |  Download Slide (.ppt)
Percent change with respect to the reference value of lateral deformation as a function of parameter r (the horizontal length of the connectors)
Figure 11

Percent change with respect to the reference value of lateral deformation as a function of parameter r (the horizontal length of the connectors)

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Introduction and Definitions
Handbook on Stiffness & Damping in Mechanical Design> Chapter 1
Supporting Systems/Foundations
Handbook on Stiffness & Damping in Mechanical Design> Chapter 5
Numerical Simulation of Spatial Synergic Interaction in the Double-Row Anti-Sliding Piles
Geological Engineering: Proceedings of the 1st International Conference (ICGE 2007)
Understanding the Problem
Design and Application of the Worm Gear> Chapter 12
Data Tabulations
Structural Shear Joints> Chapter 12
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In