0
2009 Design of Medical Devices Conference Abstracts

# A Cardiac Sound Reproduction Apparatus for Improved Stethoscope TestingOPEN ACCESS

[+] Author and Article Information
G. Nordehn

University of Minnesota Medical School Duluth

R. Ulseth, T. Bartek, B. McDonald, A. McNally, M. Menart, S. Eames, M. Flynn, B. Blaire, A. Drewek

Itasca Community College, Engineering Department

E. Branson, S. Burns

University of Minnesota Duluth, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering

J. Med. Devices 3(2), 027549 (Jul 24, 2009) (1 page) doi:10.1115/1.3147377 History: Published July 24, 2009

## Abstract

Valvular heart disease is a significant problem. The primary case physician initially does assessment through auscultation. Accuracy in classification of sounds is suboptimal (20 to 40%). Lower frequencies of heart sounds are important in classification of murmurs associated with valvular heart disease. We find stethoscope sound intensity capture falls significantly at the 1500 Hz range and lower. Strategies to improve auscultation accuracy include improving stethoscope features or developing a device that, when used with the stethoscope, augments sound capturing abilities at lower frequencies. Testing necessitated development of a reliable (without significant intra-sound variation) cardiac sound reproduction device. A sound permeable contracting polymer when used with a stethoscope signficantly increases sound intensity captured in the 625 Hz to 1500 Hz range, when tested with a reliable cardiac sound reproduction device. We prepared an air-sealed device with an amplifier, four internal speakers capable of emitting high quality, low frequency sounds, and a listening pad. An existing electronic stethoscope with, and then without, a sound permeable contracting polymer captured three sounds (normal, innocent systolic murmur, pathological systolic murmur) five times per sound. The sounds were placed in computer files. FFTs were constructed. Sound intensity within the 625 Hz to 1400 Hz range, when the sound permeable contracting polymer is used with the electronic stethoscope, relatively improves, on average, approximately 11 dB, compared to sound captured with the same electronic stethoscope without the sound permeable contracting polymer. This difference is numerically statistically significant $(p<0.001)$. Intra-sound variability testing (standard deviation) of FFTs was not significant. A sound permeable contracting polymer used with an electronic recording stethoscope significantly improves sound intensity in an important auscultation frequency range. Intra-sound testing variation was insignificant. A study is underway to demonstrate impact using an absolute reference point. However, as amplification within existing electronic stethoscopes is commercially available, potential variation in relative reference points may be overcome with existing amplification features on electronic stethoscopes, allowing improved capture of heart sounds within the 625 Hz to 1400 Hz range. Limitations include the need for human subject study. Further testing, including human subjects testing is needed prior to application for FDA approval. FDA approval is needed before any use on humans. The methodology should not be utilized clinically without FDA approval.

## Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

### Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections