0
Research Papers

A Cyclic Robot for Lower Limb Exercise

[+] Author and Article Information
Brian P. DeJong1

 School of Engineering and Technology, Central Michigan University, Mount Pleasant, MI 48859b.dejong@cmich.edu

J. Edward Colgate

Department of Mechanical Engineering,  Northwestern University, Evanston, IL 60208colgate@northwestern.edu

Michael A. Peshkin

Department of Mechanical Engineering,  Northwestern University, Evanston, IL 60208peshkin@northwestern.edu

As defined by the corresponding authors.

This problems holds for any configuration where the two crank arms are on the same side of the horizontal axis.

The path has some vertical motion because the distal Crank Arm links are not the same length.

The flat top boundary of the set is the result of the maximum possible pedal height based on the Modified Pantograph dimensions.

In actuality, it will vary slightly because of the shuffling of energy to and from the links’ masses, and to and from the user.

1

Corresponding author.

J. Med. Devices 5(3), 031006 (Aug 15, 2011) (9 pages) doi:10.1115/1.4004648 History: Received July 19, 2010; Revised June 07, 2011; Published August 15, 2011; Online August 15, 2011

This paper presents the design and simulation of a cyclic robot for lower-limb exercise robots. The robot is designed specifically for cyclic motions and the high power nature of lower-limb interaction—as such, it breaks from traditional robotics wisdom by intentionally traveling through singularities and incorporating large inertia. Such attributes lead to explicit design considerations. Results from a simulation show that the specific design requires only a reasonably sized damper and motor.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2011 by American Society of Mechanical Engineers
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 1

Comparison between lower-limb exercise robots and other devices

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 2

Sample foot paths for exercise (user is facing to the left). Running and walking paths were obtained by analyzing video available from Ref. [22] and by modifying a figure in Ref. [23]; other paths are as modeled.

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 3

User forces measured on Life Fitness X5, for a 104 kg user, during normal operation, at approximately 60 rpm. User is facing to the left. (a) Forces versus time (b) Force direction within one cycle (path as modeled).

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 4

Foot pedal on the sample path. The arrows show separation of path actuation (perpendicular) from inertial and damping forces (parallel).

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 5

The specific design, colored for the three subsystems

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 6

The sample pedal path in the four spaces

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 7

Sample paths resulting from constant phases (i.e., the angles between the crank arms). (a) Phase = 0. (b) Phase = π. (c) Phase = π/6.

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 8

Phases for paths. (a) Set of constant-phase paths. (b) One desired path, with resulting phase values.

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 9

Path boundary due to singularity at (a) θ1  = π, (b) θ1  = 0

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 10

Sample valid paths that touch all four boundaries

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 11

Apparent inertia (as a ratio of flywheel inertia) along the path

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 12

Torques on the device at the timestep when the user’s torque was maximum. Note that at this timestep, τuser is near perpendicular to the path.

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 13

Power requirements of actuators at 1-2 or 3-4, for two cycles of the path

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 14

Speed-torque curves for actuators on 1-2 versus 3-4

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In