2009 Design of Medical Devices Conference Abstracts

Separating Aortic Stenosis From Nornal Heart Decision Spaces Using a Quadratic Model OPEN ACCESS

[+] Author and Article Information
M. Guion-Johnson, A. Tewfik, K. P. Madhu, A. Erdman

J. Med. Devices 3(2), 027531 (Jul 09, 2009) (1 page) doi:10.1115/1.3147389 History: Published July 09, 2009


Automated diagnosis of heart pathology is extremely desirable in today's medical environment. The sounds of auscultation collected through a stethoscope are the simplest, fastest, and least invasive way to detect heart pathology. Upgrades in microphones, digital signal processing techniques, and computing power are making the translation of the sound into a digital medium complete. It is this completeness that allows separation between various heart states. Using a digital stethoscope available on the market, the researchers were able to separate aortic stenosis (AS) and normal (N) heart sounds using a modified Eigen classifier based upon the assumption that the data is drawn from multivariate Gaussian distributions with different means and covariance matrices. Human heart sound data was collected by a cardiologist using a commercially available Littmann Model 4000 electronic stethoscope (3M, Maplewood, MN). All data was collected via an approved Human Subjects Institutional Review board protocol. Auscultation data from 69 supine patients (36 female, 33 male, age range 18–93, average 54 years, Body Mass Index (BMI) range 16–47, average 29) from the second right intercostals space on both N and patients with AS. Diagnosis was confirmed using a standard trans-throacic echocardiogram. Eighteen normal and fourteen AS patients were used to develop normal and AS decision spaces. For each patient, approximately seven cardiac cycles were collected. The data was segmented into systole and diastole through a computerized playback program. The cardiologist determined location of S1 and S2. After segmentation, a mean heart cycle S1, systole, S2, diastole for the patient was calculated. The means for all fourteen AS patients was used to normalize the data. The normalized seven heart cycles were placed into a [3400×98] matrix that defined AS. The same was done for the normal population. These matrices were used as input for the singular value decomposition. Each measured auscultation signature was projected on the dominant scaled principal components. Eigen vectors were scaled to get the unit variances for the principal components. The entries of the feature vectors are the distances between the projected measured signatures and the centroids of the N and AS clusters. Distances between the resulting hyperspheres were calculated and projected on a two-dimensional graph of distance versus number of cycles. The first application of the Quadratic Model yielded some overlap between N and AS data. However, the data clearly separated. The input auscultation signatures were then segmented according to S1, systole, S2 and diastole and clearly aligned in the input matrices. The signatures were re-sampled to a 70 BPM cardiac cycle. Events within each segment were not aligned. The result of the standardization and alignment was clear separation between the N and AS decision spaces. There is great interest in the research community in algorithms that can be used to determine heart pathology from auscultation based heart sounds. The Quadratic Model shows 100% separation between N and AS data when S1 and S2 are properly segmented and re-sampled. When systole is isolated as the decision making attribute, separation increases by a hundred–fold.

Copyright © 2009 by American Society of Mechanical Engineers
This article is only available in the PDF format.






Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In