0
Research Papers

A Method for the Autonomous Control of Lower Limb Exoskeletons for Persons With Paraplegia

[+] Author and Article Information
Michael Goldfarb

Department of Mechanical Engineering,
Vanderbilt University,
Nashville, TN 37235

Manuscript received August 16, 2011; final manuscript received April 29, 2012; published online October 11, 2012. Assoc. Editor: Jahangir Rastegar.

J. Med. Devices 6(4), 041003 (Oct 11, 2012) (6 pages) doi:10.1115/1.4007181 History: Received August 16, 2011; Revised April 29, 2012

This paper describes a control method for a lower limb powered exoskeleton that enables a paraplegic user to perform sitting, standing, and walking movements. The different maneuvers are commanded by the user based on postural information measured by the device. The proposed user interface and control structure was implemented on a powered lower limb orthosis, and the system was tested on a paraplegic subject with a T10 complete injury. Experimental data is presented that indicates the ability of the proposed control architecture to provide appropriate user-initiated control of sitting, standing, and walking. The authors also provide a link to a video that qualitatively demonstrates the user's ability to independently control basic movements via the proposed control method.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
© 2012 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

National Spinal Cord Injury Statistical Center, 2012, “Spinal Cord Injury Facts and Figures at a Glance,” https://www.nscisc.uab.edu/PublicDocuments/fact_figures_docs/Facts%202012%20Feb%20Final.pdf.
Brown-Triolo, D. L., Roach, M. J., Nelson, K., and Triolo, R. J., 2002, “Consumer Perspectives on Mobility: Implications for Neuroprosthesis Design,” J. Rehabil. Res. Dev., 39(6), pp. 659–669. [PubMed]
Hanson, R. W., and Franklin, M. R., 1976, “Sexual Loss in Relation to Other Functional Losses for Spinal Cord Injured Males,” Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil., 57, pp. 291–293. [PubMed]
Phillips, L., Ozer, M., Axelson, P., and Fonseca, J., 1987, Spinal Cord Injury: A Guide for Patient and Family, Raven Press, New York.
Audu, M. L., To, C. S., Kobetic, R., and Triolo, R. J., 2010, “Gait Evaluation of a Novel Hip Constraint Orthosis With Implication for Walking in Paraplegia,” IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng., 18(6), pp. 610–618. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Kobetic, R., To, C. S., Schnellenberger, J. R., Audu, M. L., Bulea, T. C., Gaudio, R., Pinault, G., Tashman, S., and Triolo, R. J., 2009, “Development of Hybrid Orthosis for Standing, Walking, and Stair Climbing After Spinal Cord Injury,” J. Rehabil. Res. Dev., 43(3), pp. 447-462. [CrossRef]
To, C. S., Kobetic, R., Schnellenberger, J. R., Audu, M. L., and Triolo, R. J., 2008, “Design of a Variable Constraint Hip Mechanism for a Hybrid Neuroprosthesis to Restore Gait After Spinal Cord Injury,” IEEE/ASME Trans. Mechatron., 13(2), pp. 197–205. [CrossRef]
Durfee, W. K., and Rivard, A., 2005, “Design and Simulation of a Pneumatic, Stored-Energy, Hybrid Orthosis for Gait Restoration,” J. Biomech. Eng., 127(6), pp. 1014–1019. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Goldfarb, M., Korkowski, K., Harrold, B., and Durfee, W., 2003, “Preliminary Evaluation of a Controlled-Brake Orthosis for FES-Aided Gait,” IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng., 11(3), pp. 241–248. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Ohta, Y., Yano, H., Suzuki, R., Yoshida, M., Kawashima, N., and Nakazawa, K., 2007, “A Two-Degree-of-Freedom Motor-Powered Gait Orthosis for Spinal Cord Injury Patients,” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., Part H: J. Eng. Med., 221(6), pp. 629–639. [CrossRef]
Kwa, H. K., Noorden, J. H., Missel, M., Craig, T., Pratt, J. E., and Neuhaus, P. D., 2009, “Development of the IHMC Mobility Assist Exoskeleton,” Proceedings of the 2009 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Kobe, Japan, May 12–17, IEEE Press, New York, pp. 1349–1355. [CrossRef]
Neuhaus, P. D., Noorden, J. H., Craig, T. J., Torres, T., Kirschbaum, J., and Pratt, J. E., 2011, “Design and Evaluation of Mina: A Robotic Orthosis for Paraplegics,” IEEE International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics, Zurich, Switzerland, June 29–July 1, IEEE Press, New York, pp. 870–877. [CrossRef]
Tsukahara, A., Hasegawa, Y., and Sankai, Y., 2009, “Standing-up Motion Support for Paraplegic Patient With Robot Suit HAL,” IEEE 11th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics, Kyoto, Japan, June 23–26, IEEE Press, New York, pp. 211–217. [CrossRef]
Hasegawa, Y., Jang, J., and Sankai, Y., 2009, “Cooperative Walk Control of Paraplegia Patient and Assistive System,” IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, St. Louis, Mo, October 10–15, IEEE Press, New York, pp. 4481–4486. [CrossRef]
Suzuki, K., Mito, G., Kawamoto, H., Hasegawa, Y., and Sankai, Y., 2007, “Intention-Based Walking Support for Paraplegia Patients With Robot Suit HAL,” Adv. Rob., 21(12), pp. 1441–1469. [CrossRef]
Tsukahara, A., Kawanishi, R., Hasegawa, Y., and Sankai, Y., 2010, “Sit-to-Stand and Stand-to-Sit Transfer Support for Complete Paraplegic Patients With Robot Suit HAL,” Adv. Rob., 24(11), pp. 1615–1638. [CrossRef]
Podsiadlo, D., and Richardson, S., 1991 “The Timed Up & Go”: A Test of Basic Functional Mobility for Frail Elderly Persons,” J. Am. Geriatr. Soc., 39(2), pp. 142–148. [PubMed]

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Powered lower limb orthosis

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Functional schematic of embedded system

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Finite state machine for sitting, standing, and walking

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Commanded trajectories corresponding to transition states (a) S7 and S11, (b) S8 and S9, and (c) S10 and S12

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Schematic indicating estimated stride length (Xh) and center of pressure (Xc), both estimated based on the configuration of the orthosis

Grahic Jump Location
Fig 6

Schematic indicating the use of center of pressure (Xc) estimate for purposes of sit-to-stand and stand-to-sit transitions

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Photographic sequences showing standing, a left step, and a right step

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Joint angles and controller state during the third TUG test

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Data excerpted from Fig. 8. Top row: finite state corresponding to a sequence of steps. Middle row: center of pressure estimate (Xc, blue/bottom) and center of pressure threshold (Xĉ, red/top). Bottom row: step length estimate (Xh).

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Finite states corresponding to each of the three TUG tests

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In