Research Papers

A Compliant End-Effector to Passively Limit the Force in Tele-Operated Tissue-Cutting

[+] Author and Article Information
Santosh D. B. Bhargav

e-mail: sbhargav@mecheng.iisc.ernet.in

Shanthanu Chakravarthy

e-mail: sc@mecheng.iisc.ernet.in

G. K. Ananthasuresh

e-mail: suresh@mecheng.iisc.ernet.in
Department of Mechanical Engineering,
Indian Institute of Science,
Bangalore, Karnataka, India

1Corresponding author.

Manuscript received April 20, 2012; final manuscript received September 10, 2012; published online October 11, 2012. Assoc. Editor: Hamid M. Lankarani.

J. Med. Devices 6(4), 041005 (Oct 11, 2012) (7 pages) doi:10.1115/1.4007638 History: Received April 20, 2012; Revised September 10, 2012

This paper presents a compliant end-effector that cuts soft tissues and senses the cutting forces. The end-effector is designed to have an upper threshold on cutting forces to facilitate safe handling of tissue during automated cutting. This is demonstrated with nonlinear finite element analysis and experimental results obtained by cutting inhomogeneous phantom tissue. The cutting forces are estimated using a vision-based technique that uses amplified elastic deformation of the compliant end-effector. We also demonstrate an immersive tele-operated tissue-cutting system together with a haptic device that gives real-time force feedback to the user.

© 2012 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


van der Meijden, O. A .J., and Schijven, M. P. S., 2009, “The Value of Haptic Feedback in Conventional and Robot-Assisted Minimal Invasive Surgery and Virtual Reality Training: A Current Review,” Surg. Endosc., 23(6), pp. 1180–1190. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Okamura, A. M., 2004, “Methods for Haptic Feedback in Teleoperated Robot-Assisted Surgery,” Ind. Robot, 31(6), pp. 499–508. [CrossRef]
Hu, J. C. C., Tardella, N., Pratt, J., and English, J., 2006, “Effectiveness of Haptic Feedback in Open Surgery Simulation and Training Systems,” Stud. Health Technol. Inform., 119, pp. 213–218. [PubMed]
Coles, T. R., Meglan, D., and John, N. W., 2011, “The Role of Haptics in Medical Training Simulators: A Survey of the State of the Art,” IEEE Trans. Haptics, 4(1), pp. 51–66. [CrossRef]
Chanthasopeephan, T., Desai, J. P., and Lau, A. C. W., eds, 2004, “Deformation Resistance in Soft Tissue Cutting: A Parametric Study,” Proceedings of the 12th International Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems (HAPTICS'04), Chicago, March 27–28, pp. 323–330. [CrossRef]
Valdastri, P., Tognarelli, S., Menciassi, A., and Dario, P., 2009, “A Scalable Platform for Biomechanical Studies of Tissue Cutting Forces,” Meas. Sci. Technol., 20(4), p. 045801. [CrossRef]
Greenish, S., Hayward, V., Chial, V., Okamura, A., and Steffen, T., 2002, “Measurement, Analysis, and Display of Haptic Signals During Surgical Cutting,” Presence, 11(6), pp. 626–651. [CrossRef]
Simone, C., and Okamura, A. M., eds., 2002, “Modeling of Needle Insertion Forces for Robot-Assisted Percutaneous Therapy,” Proceedings of the International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA'02), Vol. 2, Washington, DC, May 11–15, pp. 2085–2091. [CrossRef]
Chanthasopsephan, T., Desai, J. P., and Lau, A. C. W., eds., 2005, “3D and 2D Finite Element Analysis in Soft Tissue Cutting for Haptic Display,” 12th International Conference on Advanced Robotics (ICAR'05), Seattle, WA, July 18–20, pp. 360–367. [CrossRef]
Cannon, B. R., Lillian, T. D., Magleby, S. P., Howell, L. L., and Linford, M. R., 2005, “A Compliant End-Effector for Microscribing,” Precis. Eng., 29(1), pp. 86–94. [CrossRef]
Kota, S., Lu, K.-J., Kreiner, Z., Trease, B., Arenas, J., and Geiger, J., 2005, “Design and Application of Compliant Mechanisms for Surgical Tools,” ASME. J. Biomech. Eng., 127(6), pp. 981–989. [CrossRef]
Howell, L. L., 2001, Compliant Mechanisms, Wiley, New York.
Wang, X., Ananthasuresh, G. K., and Ostrowski, J. P., 2001, “Vision-Based Sensing of Forces in Elastic Objects,” Sens. Actuators, A, A94(3), pp. 142–156. [CrossRef]
Reddy, A. N., Maheshwari, N., Sahu, D. K., and Ananthasuresh, G. K., 2010, “Miniature Compliant Grippers With Vision-Based Force Sensing,” IEEE Trans. Rob. Autom., 26(5), pp. 867–877. [CrossRef]
Mallikarjuna Rao, V., 2009, “Real-Time Haptic Rendering of Virtual and Remote Deformable Objects,” ME Project Report, Mechanical Engineering, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore.
Saxena, A., and Ananthasuresh, G. K., 2000, “On an Optimal Property of Compliant Topologies,” Struct. Multidiscip. Optim., 19(1), pp. 36–49. [CrossRef]
Hegde, S., and Ananthasuresh, G. K., 2010, “Design of Single-Input-Single-Output Compliant Mechanisms for Practical Applications Using Selection Maps,” ASME J. Mech. Des., 132(8), p. 081007. [CrossRef]
Hall, T. J., Bilgen, M., Insana, M. F., and Krouskop, T. A., 1997, “Phantom Materials for Elastography,” IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control, 44(6), pp. 1355–1365. [CrossRef]


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Tissue-cutting tele-operation setup

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

The slave manipulator cutting phantom tissue. The inserts show close-up views of the setup.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

The compliant end-effector

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Flow of information in the tele-operated tissue-cutting setup

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

(a) The deformation characteristic of the chosen mechanism. (b) The spring-leverage model of the mechanism to represent the kinematic and elastic deformation characteristics of the mechanism.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

(a) The drawing and (b) the fabricated mechanism that serves as the compliant end-effector. All dimensions are in mm.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

The end-effector, attached to a rigid plate, is moved to cut the specimen; some of the beams that buckle due to the force of cutting are pointed out

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

(a) The points on the scalpel chosen to apply the force (Fc). (b) X-displacement characteristic of the end-effector for the cutting-force (Fc) indicating the reaction in the overall stiffness of the mechanism in the cutting direction. (c) Lift-off of the scalpel for the cutting-force indicating that different points on the scalpel retract depending on the cutting-force. (d) The close-up view (of the box) showing that the Y-displacement characteristic for the points d1-4 is different (although very subtle).

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

(a) A specimen to demonstrate lift-off-characteristic of the compliant end-effector. (b) Plot comparing the experimental, estimated and simulated values of the Y-displacement of tip of the scalpel. (c) Cutting profile of different points of the scalpel estimated using a priori curve.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

(a) The compliant end-effector is moved against the load-cell to both demonstrate the force-limitation and as well as calibration. (b) Input force versus output displacement of the compliant cutter used for force-calibration.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

(a) Phantom tissue used in the experiments. (b) Plot comparing the forces measured by compliant and rigid end-effectors.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Measured force during tele-operated tissue-cutting operation



Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In