Research Papers

Computational Fluid Dynamics Evaluation of Equivalency in Hemodynamic Alterations Between Driver, Integrity, and Similar Stents Implanted Into an Idealized Coronary Artery

[+] Author and Article Information
Timothy J. Gundert

Department of Biomedical Engineering,
Marquette University,
1515 West Wisconsin Avenue,
Milwaukee, WI 53233

Ronak J. Dholakia

Department of Neurological Surgery,
Stony Brook University Medical Center,
Stony Brook, NY 11794

Dennis McMahon

Medtronic CardioVascular,
3576 Unocal Place,
Santa Rosa, CA 95403

John F. LaDisa

Department of Biomedical Engineering,
Marquette University,
1515 West Wisconsin Avenue,
Milwaukee, WI 53233;
Department of Medicine,
Division of Cardiovascular Medicine,
Medical College of Wisconsin,
8701 Watertown Plank Road,
Milwaukee, WI 53226
e-mail: john.ladisa@marquette.edu

1Corresponding author.

Manuscript received July 24, 2012; final manuscript received January 2, 2013; published online February 4, 2013. Assoc. Editor: Keefe B. Manning.

J. Med. Devices 7(1), 011004 (Feb 04, 2013) (10 pages) Paper No: MED-12-1093; doi: 10.1115/1.4023413 History: Received July 24, 2012; Revised January 02, 2013

We tested the hypothesis that a slight modification in fabrication from the Driver to the Integrity stent (Medtronic) results in nearly equivalent distributions of wall shear stress (WSS) and mean exposure time (MET), reflective of flow stagnation, and that these differences are considerably less than the Multi-Link Vision (Abbott Vascular) or BX Velocity (Cordis) bare metal stents when evaluated by computational fluid dynamics (CFD). Arteries were modeled as idealized straight rigid vessels without lesions. Two vessel diameters (2.25 and 3.0 mm) were studied for each stent and 2.75 mm diameter Integrity stents were also modeled to quantify the impact from best- and worst-case orientations of the stent struts relative to the primary blood flow direction. All stents were 18 mm in length and over-deployed by 10%. The results indicated that, regardless of diameter, the BX Velocity stents had the greatest percentage of the vessel exposed to adverse WSS followed by the Vision, Integrity, and Driver stents. In general, when strut thickness and stent:lumen ratio are similar, the orientation of struts is a determining factor for deleterious flow patterns. For a given stent, the number of struts was a larger determinant of adverse WSS and MET than strut orientation, suggesting that favorable blood flow patterns can be achieved by limiting struts to those providing adequate scaffolding. In conclusion, the Driver and Integrity stents both limit their number of linkages to those which provide adequate scaffolding while also maintaining similar strut thickness and stent:lumen ratios. The Integrity stent also imparts a slight helical velocity component. The modest difference in the fabrication approach between the Driver and Integrity stents is, therefore, not hemodynamically substantial in this idealized analysis, particularly relative to potentially adverse flow conditions introduced by the other stents modeled. This data was used in conjunction with associated regulatory filings and submitted to the FDA as part of the documents facilitating the recent approval for sale of the Resolute Integrity stent in the United States.

Copyright © 2013 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Moses, J. W., Leon, M. B., Popma, J. J., Fitzgerald, P. J., Holmes, D. R., O'Shaughnessy, C., Caputo, R. P., Kereiakes, D. J., Williams, D. O., Teirstein, P. S., Jaeger, J. L., and Kuntz, R. E., 2003, “Sirolimus-Eluting Stents Versus Standard Stents in Patients With Stenosis in a Native Coronary Artery,” N. Engl. J. Med., 349(14), pp. 1315–1323. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Gilbert, J., Raboud, J., and Zinman, B., 2004, “Meta-Analysis of the Effect of Diabetes on Restenosis Rates Among Patients Receiving Coronary Angioplasty Stenting,” Diabetes Care, 27(4), pp. 990–994. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Corbett, S. C., Ajdari, A., Coskun, A. U., and N-Hashemi, H., 2010, “In Vitro and Computational Thrombosis on Artificial Surfaces With Shear Stress,” Artif. Organs, 34(7), pp. 561–569. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Briguori, C., Sarais, C., Pagnotta, P., Liistro, F., Montorfano, M., Chieffo, A., Sgura, F., Corvaja, N., Albiero, R., Stankovic, G., Toutoutzas, C., Bonizzoni, E., Di Mario, C., and Colombo, A., 2002, “In-Stent Restenosis in Small Coronary Arteries: Impact of Strut Thickness,” J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., 40(3), pp. 403–409. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Garasic, J. M., Edelman, E. R., Squire, J. C., Seifert, P., Williams, M. S., and Rogers, C., 2000, “Stent and Artery Geometry Determine Intimal Thickening Independent of Arterial Injury,” Circulation, 101(7), pp. 812–818. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Kastrati, A., Mehilli, J., Dirschinger, J., Dotzer, F., Schuhlen, H., Neumann, F. J., Fleckenstein, M., Pfafferott, C., Seyfarth, M., and Schomig, A., 2001, “Intracoronary Stenting and Angiographic Results: Strut Thickness Effect on Restenosis Outcome (Isar-Stereo) Trial,” Circulation, 103(23), pp. 2816–2821. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Gundert, T. J., Marsden, A. L., Yang, W., and LaDisa, J. F., Jr., 2012, “Optimization of Cardiovascular Stent Design Using Computational Fluid Dynamics,” ASME J. Biomech. Eng., 134(1), p. 011002. [CrossRef]
Gundert, T. J., Marsden, A. L., Yang, W., Marks, D. S., and LaDisa, J. F., Jr., 2012, “Identification of Hemodynamically Optimal Coronary Stent Designs Based on Vessel Diameter,” IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., 59(7), pp. 1992–2002. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
LaDisa, J. F.Jr., Olson, L. E., Guler, I., Hettrick, D. A., Audi, S. H., Kersten, J. R., Warltier, D. C., and Pagel, P. S., 2004, “Stent Design Properties and Deployment Ratio Influence Indexes of Wall Shear Stress: A Three-Dimensional Computational Fluid Dynamics Investigation Within a Normal Artery,” J. Appl. Physiol., 97(1), pp. 424–430. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Gundert, T. J., Shadden, S. C., Williams, A. R., Koo, B. K., Feinstein, J. A., and LaDisa, J. F., Jr., 2011, “A Rapid and Computationally Inexpensive Method to Virtually Implant Current and Next-Generation Stents Into Subject-Specific Computational Fluid Dynamics Models,” Ann. Biomed. Eng., 39(5), pp. 1423–1437. [CrossRef]
Tanigawa, J., Barlis, P., and Di Mario, C., 2007, “Intravascular Optical Coherence Tomography: Optimisation of Image Acquisition and Quantitative Assessment of Stent Strut Apposition,” EuroIntervention, 3(1), pp. 128–136. [PubMed]
Muller, J., Sahni, O., Li, X., Jansen, K. E., Shephard, M. S., and Taylor, C. A., 2005, “Anisotropic Adaptive Finite Element Method for Modelling Blood Flow,” Comput. Methods Biomech. Biomed. Eng., 8(5), pp. 295–305. [CrossRef]
Sahni, O., Muller, J., Jansen, K. E., Shephard, M. S., and Taylor, C. A., 2006, “Efficient Anisotropic Adaptive Discretization of the Cardiovascular System,” Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng., 195(41–43), pp. 5634–5655. [CrossRef]
LaDisa, J. F., Jr., Hettrick, D. A., Olson, L. E., Guler, I., Gross, E. R., Kress, T. T., Kersten, J. R., Warltier, D. C., and Pagel, P. S., 2002, “Stent Implantation Alters Coronary Artery Hemodynamics and Wall Shear Stress During Maximal Vasodilation,” J. Appl. Physiol., 93(6), pp. 1939–1946. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
LaDisa, J. F., Jr., Guler, I., Olson, L. E., Hettrick, D. A., Kersten, J. R., Warltier, D. C., and Pagel, P. S., 2003, “Three-Dimensional Computational Fluid Dynamics Modeling of Alterations in Coronary Wall Shear Stress Produced by Stent Implantation,” Ann. Biomed. Eng., 31(8), pp. 972–980. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
LaDisa, J. F., Jr., Olson, L. E., Guler, I., Hettrick, D. A., Kersten, J. R., Warltier, D. C., and Pagel, P. S., 2005, “Circumferential Vascular Deformation After Stent Implantation Alters Wall Shear Stress Evaluated With Time-Dependent 3D Computational Fluid Dynamics Models,” J. Appl. Physiol., 98(3), pp. 947–957. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Williams, A. R., Koo, B. K., Gundert, T. J., Fitzgerald, P. J., and LaDisa, J. F., Jr., 2010, “Local Hemodynamic Changes Caused by Main Branch Stent Implantation and Subsequent Virtual Side Branch Balloon Angioplasty in a Representative Coronary Bifurcation,” J. Appl. Physiol., 109(2), pp. 532–540. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Ellwein, L. M., Otake, H., Gundert, T. J., Koo, B. K., Shinke, T., Honda, Y., Shite, J., and LaDisa, J. F., Jr., 2011, “Optical Coherence Tomography for Patient-Specific 3D Artery Reconstruction and Evaluation of Wall Shear Stress in a Left Circumflex Coronary Artery,” Cardiovasc. Eng. Technol., 2(3), pp. 212–217. [CrossRef]
Vignon-Clementel, I. E., Figueroa, C. A., Jansen, K. E., and Taylor, C. A., 2006, “Outflow Boundary Conditions for Three-Dimensional Finite Element Modeling of Blood Flow and Pressure in Arteries,” Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng., 195(29–32), pp. 3776–3796. [CrossRef]
Tang, B., Cheng, C., Draney, M., Wilson, N., Tsao, P., Herfkens, R., and Taylor, C., 2006, “Abdominal Aortic Hemodynamics in Young Healthy Adults at Rest and During Lower Limb Exercise: Quantification Using Image-Based Computer Modeling,” Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol., 291(2), pp. H668–H676. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Lonyai, A., Dubin, A. M., Feinstein, J. A., Taylor, C. A., and Shadden, S. C., 2010, “New Insights Into Pacemaker Lead-Induced Venous Occlusion: Simulation-Based Investigation of Alterations in Venous Biomechanics,” Cardiovasc. Eng., 10(2), pp. 84–90. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Malek, A. M., Alper, S. L., and Izumo, S., 1999, “Hemodynamic Shear Stress and Its Role in Atherosclerosis,” JAMA, J. Am. Med. Assoc., 282(21), pp. 2035–2042. [CrossRef]
Murphy, J. B., and Boyle, F. J., 2010, “A Full-Range, Multi-Variable, CFD-Based Methodology to Identify Abnormal Near-Wall Hemodynamics in a Stented Coronary Artery,” Biorheology, 47(2), pp. 117–132. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Shinke, T., Robinson, K., Gilson, P., Burke, M. G., Cheshire, N. J., and Caro, C. G., 2007, “Abstract 6059: Novel Helical Stent Design Elicits Swirling Blood Flow Pattern and Inhibits Neointima Formation in Porcine Carotid Arteries,” Circulation118(18S), 1054.
Duraiswamy, N., Schoephoerster, R. T., and Moore, J. E., Jr., 2009, “Comparison of Near-Wall Hemodynamic Parameters in Stented Artery Models,” ASME J. Biomech. Eng., 131(6), p. 061006. [CrossRef]
Pant, S., Bressloff, N. W., Forrester, A. I., and Curzen, N., 2010, “The Influence of Strut-Connectors in Stented Vessels: A Comparison of Pulsatile Flow Through Five Coronary Stents,” Ann. Biomed. Eng., 38(5), pp. 1893–1907. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Ormiston, J. A., Webber, B., and Webster, M. W., 2011, “Stent Longitudinal Integrity Bench Insights Into a Clinical Problem,” JACC Cardiovasc. Intervent., 4(12), pp. 1310–1317. [CrossRef]
Mortier, P., De Beule, M., Segers, P., Verdonck, P., and Verhegghe, B., 2011, “Virtual Bench Testing of New Generation Coronary Stents,” EuroIntervention, 7(3), pp. 369–376. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Ene-Iordache, B., Mosconi, L., Antiga, L., Bruno, S., Anghileri, A., Remuzzi, G., and Remuzzi, A., 2003, “Radial Artery Remodeling in Response to Shear Stress Increase Within Arteriovenous Fistula for Hemodialysis Access,” Endothelium, 10(2), pp. 95–102. [CrossRef] [PubMed]


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Computer-aided design representations of the Integrity (Medtronic), Driver (Medtronic), Multi-Link Vision (Abbott Vascular), and BX Velocity (Cordis) stents before ((left) with stents longitudinally sectioned for clarity), and after virtual implantation into an idealized artery using 10% over-deployment (right)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Final computational meshes used for each stent and a wide angle view showing increased mesh density within the stented region, as compared to the proximal and distal unstented regions

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Blood flow at the outlet of the 3 mm diameter BX Velocity stent (top) and corresponding blood pressure (middle). Gridlines have been added to delineate each cardiac cycle and evolution of blood flow and pressure values between successive cardiac cycles. (inset) The residual error for the entire simulation is also shown along with that after the first four time steps (bottom). These tracings are similar for all of the stents modeled.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Magnitude-weighted near-wall velocity vectors (range: 0 to 4 cm/s) from the middle portions of each 2.25 mm diameter vessel. Vectors have been superimposed on the model surface and stent struts have been removed for clarity.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Mean exposure time (MET: range 0 to 0.45 s/cm) providing an indication of the average duration particles reside within various regions of each 2.25 mm diameter vessel. The portion of vessels shown (top) are from the middle of the stented region. (A) Longitudinal, and (B) generally circumferential slices are provided to qualitatively analyze the impact of strut thickness, proximity, and profile on the MET.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Time-averaged wall shear stress (TAWSS) normalized by the average wall shear stress in the proximal portion of each 3.0 mm diameter vessel

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Time-averaged wall shear stress (TAWSS) normalized by the average wall shear stress in the proximal portion of each 2.25 mm diameter vessel

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Histograms of the TAWSS within proximal (top), center (middle), and distal (bottom) intrastrut areas of each stent. It is desirable for histogram curves to have a large amount of their intrastrut area exposed to greater normalized time-averaged wall shear stress.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Instantaneous distributions of wall shear stress at three locations within intrastrut regions of Driver and Integrity stents. Tracings between the stents are indistinguishable at locations ‘A’ and ‘B,’ but slight differences in the relative proximity of struts at location ‘C’ causes modest differences in instantaneous values.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Time-averaged wall shear stress (TAWSS) normalized by the average wall shear stress in the proximal portion of the 2.25, 2.75, and 3.00 mm vessels containing Integrity stents with 7.5 crowns (2.2.5 and 2.75 mm) or 9.5 crowns (2.75 undersized vessel and 3.00 mm)




Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In