Research Paper

Radio Frequency Identification as a Testbed for Integration of Low Frequency Radio Frequency Sensors Into Orthopedic Implants

[+] Author and Article Information
Mary Beth M. Grabowsky

Department of Biomedical Engineering,
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute,
110 8th Street, Troy, NY 12180

Richard L. Uhl

Division of Orthopaedic Surgery,
Albany Medical College,
47 New Scotland Avenue,
Albany, NY 12208

Mona M. Hella

Department of Electrical, Computer,
and Systems Engineering,
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute,
110 8th Street, Troy, NY 12180

Eric H. Ledet

Department of Biomedical Engineering,
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute,
110 8th Street, Troy, NY 12180
e-mail: ledete@rpi.edu

In the United States, RF communications in medical devices are generally limited to frequencies in the Industrial Scientific and Medical (ISM) bandwidths, which are defined by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC). For communications with implantable sensors, the range is effectively limited to 130 kHz (±5 kHz), 6.78 MHz (±0.015 MHz), 13.56 MHz (±0.007 MHz), 40.68 MHz (±0.02 MHz), and 915 MHz (±13 MHz).

1Corresponding author.

Manuscript received March 12, 2012; final manuscript received January 8, 2013; published online February 13, 2013. Assoc. Editor: Ming-Yih Lee.

J. Med. Devices 7(1), 011008 (Feb 13, 2013) (8 pages) Paper No: MED-12-1036; doi: 10.1115/1.4023499 History: Received March 12, 2012; Revised January 08, 2013

Recent advances in radio frequency (RF) sensor systems provide new opportunities to wirelessly collect data from inside the body. “Smart implants” instrumented with sensors have been used as research tools for decades, but only recently have implantable sensors become small enough and robust enough to be used in daily clinical practice. In orthopedic surgery, implants provide a vehicle onto which small RF sensors can be mounted to gather data for diagnostics. However, the sensors must function in a challenging environment which requires long term functionality under demanding physical and mechanical conditions. The purpose of this study was to parametrically test low frequency RF systems under simulated in vivo conditions to determine feasibility of sensor integration into orthopedic applications. Three low frequency RF systems were tested in several clinically relevant scenarios in vitro to characterize (1) strategies for maximizing communication range, (2) physical robustness, and (3) mechanical performance. Systems were tested in air, saline, soft tissue, bone, and in proximity to metal. Hermeticity was assessed during a 208 week period. Effects of γ-irradiation and repeated steam sterilized were measured. Strain at failure was measured by mechanical testing of various packaging configurations. All systems were capable of greater than 20 cm read range under ideal conditions. Saline, soft tissue, and bone had minimal effect on signal transmission, but read range was sensitive to the proximity of stainless steel. The electronics were tolerant of steam sterilization but not of γ-irradiation. Polymer encapsulation is robust enough for many orthopedic applications, but ceramic encapsulated sensors need to be optimized for weight-bearing applications to avoid brittle failure. Although sensor packaging remains a challenge, the technology exists to incorporate passive wireless implantable sensors into orthopedic daily practice.

Copyright © 2013 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Waugh, T., 1966, “Intravital Measurements During Instrumental Correction of Idiopathic Scoliosis,” Acta. Orthop. Scan., 93(S), pp. 58–75.
Nachamson, A., and Elfstrom, G., 1971, “Intravital Wireless Telemetry of Axial Forces in Harrington Distraction Rods in Patients With Idiopathic Scoliosis,” J. Bone. Joint. Surg., 53-A(3), pp. 445–464.
Elfstrom, G., and Nachemson, A., 1973, “Telemetry Recordings of Forces in the Harrington Distraction Rod: A Method for Increasing Safety in the Operative Treatment of Scoliosis Patients,” Clin. Orthop. Rel. Res., 93, pp. 158–172. [CrossRef]
Cochran, G., 1972, “Implantation of Strain Gages on Bone In Vivo,” J. Biomech., 5, pp. 119–23. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Carlson, C., Mann, R., and Harris, W., 1974, “A Radio Telemetry Device for Monitoring Cartilage Surface Pressures in the Human Hip,” IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., 21(4), pp. 257–264. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Fonseca, J., and Silva, O., 1975, “Measurements of Stress and Strain in Live Bone by Electrical Strain Gage Method,” Rev. Bras. Pesqui. Med. Biol., 8(5–6), pp. 469–474. [PubMed]
Rydell, N., 1966, “Forces Acting On the Femoral Head-Prosthesis: A Study On Strain Gauge Supplied Prostheses in Living Persons,” Acta. Orthop. Scand., 37(Suppl. 88), pp. 1–132. [PubMed]
Burny, F., 1983, “Strain Gauge Measurement of Fracture Healing,” A.Brooker, W.Cooney, and E.Chao, eds., Principles of External Fixation, Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore, MD, pp. 71–82.
Finkenzeller, K., 2003, RFID Handbook: Fundamentals and Applications in Contactless Smart Cards and Identification, John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken.
Klair, D. K., Chin, K. W., and Raad, R., 2010, “A Survey and Tutorial of RFID Anti-Collision Protocols,” IEEE Communication Surveys & Tutorials, 12(3), pp. 400–421. [CrossRef]
Young, W., and Budynas, R., 2002, Roark’s Formulas for Stress and Strain, 7th ed., McGraw-Hill, New York.
Frocht, M., 1948, Photoelasticity, Vol. 2, John Wiley & Sons, New York.
Davy, D. T., Kotzar, G. M., Grown, R. H., Heiple, K. G., Goldberg, V. M., Berilla, J., and Burstein, A., 1988, “Telemetric Force Measurements Across the Hip After Total Arthroplasty,” J. Bone Joint Surg., 70-A(1), pp. 45–50.
Bergmann, G., Graichen, F., and Rohlmann, A., 1993, “Hip Joint Loading During Walking and Running Measured in Two Patients,” J. Biomech., 26(8), pp. 969–990. [CrossRef]
Bergmann, G., Beuretxbacher, G., Heller, M., Graichen, F., Rohlmann, A., Strauss, J., and Duda, D. N., 2001, “Hip Contact Forces and Gait Patterns From Routine Activities,” J. Biomech., 34, pp. 859–871. [CrossRef]
Otake, Y., Suzuki, N., Hattori, A., Miki, H., Yamamura, M., Yonenobu, K., Ochi, T., and Sugano, N., 2007, “System for Intraoperative Evaluation of Soft-Tissue-Generated Forces During Total Hip Arthroplasty by Measurement of the Pressure Distribution in Artificial Joints,” Comput. Aided Surg., 12(1), pp. 53–59.
Morris, B., D’Lima, D., Slamin, J., Kovacevic, N., Arms, S. W., Townsend, C. P., and Colwell, C. W., 2001, “e-Knee: Evolution of the Electronic Knee Prosthesis. Telemetry Technology Development,” J. Bone Joint Surg., 83-A (Suppl. 2, Part 1), pp. 62–66.
Taylor, S., and Walker, P., 2001, “Forces and Moments Telemetered From Two Distal Femoral Replacements During Various Activities,” J. Biomech., 34, pp. 839–848. [CrossRef]
Heinlein, B., Kutzner, I., Graichen, F., Bender, A., Rohlmann, A., Halder, A. M., Beier, A., and Bergmann, G., 2009, “ESB Clinical Biomechanics Award 2008: Complete Data of Total Knee Replacement Loading for Level Walking and Stair Climbing Measured In Vivo With a Follow-Up of 6-10 Months,” Clin. Biomech., 24(4), pp. 315–326. [CrossRef]
D’Lima, D., Steklov, N., Patil, S., and Colwell, C., 2008, “The Mark Coventry Award: In Vivo Knee Forces During Recreation and Exercise After Knee Arthroplasty,” Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res., 466(11), pp. 2605–2611. [CrossRef]
Westerhoff, P., Graichen, F., Bender, A., Halder, A., Beier, A., Rohlmann, A., and Bergmann, G., 2009, “In Vivo Measurement of Shoulder Joint Loads During Activities of Daily Living,” J. Biomech., 42(12), pp. 1840–1849. [CrossRef]
Ledet, E. H., Tymeson, M. P., DiRisio, D. J., Cohen, B., and Uhl, R. L., 2005, “Direct Real Time Measurement of In Vivo Forces in the Lumbar Spine,” Spine J., 5(1), pp. 85–94. [CrossRef]
Ledet, E. H., Sachs, B. L., Brunski, J. B., Gatto, C. E., and Donzelli, P. S., 2000, “Real Time In Vivo Loading in the Lumbar Spine. Part 1: Interbody Implant—Load Cell Design and Preliminary Results,” Spine, 25(20), pp. 2595–2600. [CrossRef]
Rohlmann, A., Bergmann, G., Graichen, F., and Mayer, H. M., 1995, “Telemetrized Load Measurement Using Instrumented Spinal Internal Fixators in a Patient With Degenerative Instability,” Spine, 20(24), pp. 2683–2689. [CrossRef]
Rohlmann, A., Graichen, F., Kayser, R., Bender, A., and Bergmann, G., 2008, “Loads On a Telemeterized Vertebral Body Replacement Measured in Two Patients,” Spine, 33(11), pp. 1170–1179. [CrossRef]
Schneider, E., Michel, M. C., Genge, M., Zuber, K., Ganz, R., and Perren, S. M., 2001, “Loads Acting in an Intramedullary Nail During Fracture Healing in the Human Femur,” J. Biomech., 34, pp. 849–857. [CrossRef]
Lanyon, L., Hampson, W., Goodship, A., and Shah, J., 1975, “Bone Deformation Recorded In Vivo From Strain Gauges Attached to the Human Tibial Shaft,” Acta. Orthop. Scand., 46(2), pp. 256–268. [CrossRef]
Brown, R., Burstein, A., and Frankel, V., 1982, “Telemetering In Vivo Loads From Nail Plate Implants,” J. Biomech., 15(11), pp. 815–823. [CrossRef]
Rohlmann, A., Bergmann, G., and Graichen, F., 1994, “A Spinal Fixation Device for In Vivo Load Measurement,” J. Biomech., 27(7), pp. 961–967. [CrossRef]
Burny, F., Donkerwolcke, M., Moulart, F., Bourgois, R., Puers, R., Van Schuylenbergh, K., Barbosa, M., Paiva, O., Rodes, F., Begueret, J. B., and Lawes, P., 2000, “Concept, Design, and Fabrication of Smart Orthopaedic Implants,” Med. Eng. Phys., 22, pp. 469–479. [CrossRef]
English, T., and Kilvington, M., 1979, “In Vivo Records of Hip Loads Using a Femoral Implant With Telemetric Output,” J. Biomed. Eng., 1(2), pp. 111–115. [CrossRef]
Carlson.C., Mann, R., and Harris, W., 1974, “A Radio Telemetry Device for Monitoring Cartilage Surface Pressures in the Human Hip,” IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., 21(4), pp. 257–264. [CrossRef]
Ko, W., and Liang, S., 1980, “RF-Powered Cage System for Implant Biotelemetry,” IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., 27(8), pp. 460–467. [CrossRef]
Bergmann, G., Graichen, F., Siraky, J., Jendrzynski, J., and Rohlmann, A., 1988, “Multichannel Strain Gauge Telemetry System for Orthopaedic Implants,” J. Biomech., 21(2), pp. 169–176. [CrossRef]
Ledet, E. H., D’Lima, D., Westerhoff, P., Szivek, J. A., Wachs, R. A., and Bergmann, G., 2012, “Implantable Sensor Technology: From Research to Clinical Practice,” J. Am. Acad. Orthop. Surg., 20, pp. 383–392. [CrossRef]
Dezettel, L., 1960, The Grid Dip Meter, Electronics World, pp. 50–51.
Halliday, D., Resnick, R., and Walker, J., 2011, Fundamentals of Physics Extended, 9th ed., John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ.
Kaiser, K., 2005, Electromagnetic Compatibility Handbook, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
Dimitriejev, S., Golubovic, S., Zupac, D., Pejovic, M., and Stojandinovic, N., 1989, “Analysis of Gamma-Radiation Induced Instability Mechanisms in CMOS Transistors,” Solid-State Electronics, 32(5), pp. 349–353. [CrossRef]
Holmes-Siedle, A., and Adams, L., 2002, Handbook of Radiation Effects, 2nd ed., Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
Ellis, T., Bourgeault, C., and Kyle, R., 2001, “Screw Position Affects Dynamic Compression Plate Strain in an In Vitro Fracture Model,” J. Orthop. Trauma, 15(5), pp. 333–337. [CrossRef]
Painter, P., and Coleman, M., 1997, Fundamentals of Polymer Science, 2nd ed., CRC Press, New York.
Ko, W., and Spear, T., 1985. “Packaging of Implantable Electronics: Past, Present, and Future Developments”, W.Ko, J.Mugica, and A.Ripart, eds., Implantable Sensors for Closed-Loop Prosthetic Systems, Future Publishing, Mount Kisco, pp. 259–304.
Levine, M., Aida, B., Mandl, K., Kohane, I., and Halamka, J., 2007, “What are the Benefits and Risks of Fitting Patients With Radiofrequency Identification Devices?” PLoS. Med., 4(11), pp. 1709–1711. [CrossRef]
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Food and Drug Administration Center for Devices and Radiological Health, 2004, “Guidance for Industry and FDA Staff. Class II Special Controls Guidance Document: Implantable Radiofrequency Transponder System for Patient Identification and Health Information.”
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Food and Drug Administration Center for Devices and Radiological Health, 2006, “Guidance for Industry and Food and Drug Administration; Class II Special Controls Guidance Document: Implantable Intra-Aneurysm Pressure Measurement System,” Docket No. 2005D-0505.


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

The tag (square) was placed within the intramedullary canal of a porcine femur to assess signal transmission through bone and soft tissue. The fine scale shown is mm.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Glass tags were tested in three point bending to determine maximum strain at failure of the packaging. Contact spacing was 10 mm and the samples were tested at 0.1 mm per min.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

The tags evaluated include (a) 128 kHz 2 × 12 mm cylindrical glass tag, (b) 125 kHz 2 × 12 mm cylindrical glass tag, and (c) 125 kHz 12 × 2 epoxy disk tag. The scale shown is mm.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Linear offset between the tag and reader affected read range for all three systems. Maximum read range (MRR) was over 20 cm for all tags when aligned in air. Bars are 95% confidence interval.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Angular misalignment between the tag and the reader affected read range for all three systems. Bars are 95% confidence interval. MRR, maximum read range.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Tag collision (proximity of a second tag) dramatically affected read range of the Tag 128C system which has no anticollision feature. The effects were much more limited with the Tag 125C system which incorporates anticollision. Bars are 95% confidence interval.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Relative to maximum read range, saline, soft tissue, and cortical bone had no effect. Recessing in stainless steel and γ-irradiation significantly reduced the read range of all systems. *p < 0.001 relative to maximum read range. Bars are standard deviation.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Failure of the glass tags was initiated by cracks which formed at the point of contact with the center loading plateau



Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In