Technical Briefs

Design of a New Portable Cryostorage Device

[+] Author and Article Information
R. V. Devireddy

e-mail: devireddy@me.lsu.edu
Department of Mechanical Engineering,
Louisiana State University,
Baton Rouge, LA 70803

1Corresponding author.

Manuscript received February 22, 2012; final manuscript received October 17, 2012; published online February 4, 2013. Review conducted by Erol Sancaktar.

J. Med. Devices 7(1), 014501 (Feb 04, 2013) (8 pages) Paper No: MED-12-1023; doi: 10.1115/1.4023275 History: Received February 22, 2012; Revised October 17, 2012

The currently available cryostorage systems are cumbersome to operate and offer little in the way of sample storage flexibility and user-friendliness. The aim is to redesign and fabricate a user-friendly portable storage system with monitoring capabilities for storage of cryopreserved biological samples for use in a small research laboratory setting. The proposed system consists of two concentric cylinders, between which a vacuum layer provides a thermal barrier and is similar to existing systems. More importantly, to improve sample accessibility and sample retrieval time, a new suspended tower design was developed while an instrumentation backpack provides housing for the monitoring systems. The new suspended tower design for holding the frozen biological samples is designed to hold traditional cryovials (1.5 ml and/or 1.2 ml or 1.5 × 10−6 m3 and/or 1.2 × 10−6 m3) and can also be modified to hold larger T-flasks, if required. The instrumentation consists of a capacitance based liquid level sensor, level monitor, and transmitter. The designed system is capable of holding ∼430 cryovials and holds ∼50 l (0.05 m3) of liquid nitrogen and requires refilling approximately every four to five weeks.

Copyright © 2013 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Desai, N. N., and Goldfarb, J., 2006, “Survey of Cryostorage in a Medium-Sized IVF Program,” Fertil Steril., 86, pp. S203–S204. [CrossRef]
Karakaya, F., Caputcu, A. T., Celasin, O., Cetinkaya, G., Akkoc, T., Tasdemir, U., and Arat, S., 2011, “Establishing Cell-Banks of Anatolian Domestic Breeds With Visualization of Cryostorage,” Curr. Opin. Biotech., 22, pp. S58–S58. [CrossRef]
Lawton, D. M,. Oswald, W. B. A., 1992, “Cassette System for Systematic Cryostorage of Low-Temperature Scanning Electron-Microscopy Stubs,” J. Microsc. Oxford, 167, pp. 227–231. [CrossRef]
Wheeler, M. H., 2000, “Cryostorage of Cottonseed With Liquid Nitrogen,” Seed Sci Technol., 28(2), pp. 357–366.
Widholm, J. M., Nguyen, M. V., and Luo, X. M., 1997, “Long Term Cryostorage of Several Unique Plant Tissue Cultures,” Plant Physiol., 114(3), pp. 575–575. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Dmitrevs,Y. P., Kashtano, E. M., Melnik, Y. M., Sytnik, V. V., and Vasilev, L. M., 1974, “Gas-Thermostated Hydrogen-Helium Portable 100 I Dewar Flask,” Cryogenics, 14(10), pp. 551–552. [CrossRef]
Pinto, A. L. D., and Paiva, C. L., 2010, “Developing a Functional Ready to Bake Dough for Pies Using the Quality Function Deployment (QFD) Method,” Ciencia Tecnol. Alime, 30, pp. 36–43. [CrossRef]
Fung, R. Y. K., Chen, Y. Z., and Tang, J. F., 2006, “Estimating the Functional Relationships for Quality Function Deployment Under Uncertainties,” Fuzzy Set Syst., 157(1), pp. 98–120. [CrossRef]
Verma, D., Chilakapati, R., and Fabrycky, W. J., 1998, “Analyzing a Quality Function Deployment Matrix: An Expert System-Based Approach to Identify Inconsistencies and Opportunities,” J. Eng. Design, 9(3), pp. 251–261. [CrossRef]
Linsey, J. S., Clauss, E. F., Kurtoglu, T., Murphy, J. T., Wood, K. L., Markman, A. B., 2011, “An Experimental Study of Group Idea Generation Techniques: Understanding the Roles of Idea Representation and Viewing Methods,” J. Mech. Des., 133(3), p. 031008. [CrossRef]
Shah, J. J., Vargas-Hernandez, N., Summers, J. D., and Kulkarni, S., 2001, “Collaborative Sketching (C-Sketch)—An Idea Generation Technique For Engineering Design,” J. Creative Behav., 35(3), pp. 168–198. [CrossRef]
Shiratuddin, N., and Sarif, S. M., 2009, “The md-Matrix: A Learning Tool in the Mobile Application Development Course,” Int. J. Mob Commun., 7(4), pp. 494–514. [CrossRef]
Frey, D. D., Herder, P. M., Wijnia, Y., Subrahmanian, E., Katsikopoulos, K., Clausing, D. P., 2009, “The Pugh Controlled Convergence Method: Model-Based Evaluation and Implications for Design Theory,” Res. Eng. Des., 20(1), pp. 41–58. [CrossRef]
Najimi, S., and Rubinsky, B., 1997, “Non-Invasive Detection of Thermal Stress Fractures in Frozen Biological Materials,” Cryo-Lett., 18, pp. 209–216.
Shiue, S. T., Lien, P. T., and He, J. L., 2000, “Effect of Coating Thickness on Thermal Stresses in Tungsten-Coated Optical Fibers,” J. Appl. Phys., 87(8), pp. 3759–3762. [CrossRef]
Bera, S. C., Ray, J. K., and Chattopadhyay, S., 2006, “A Low-Cost Noncontact Capacitance-Type Level Transducer for a Conducting Liquid,” IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas.,55(3), pp. 778–786. [CrossRef]
Basu, S., Saha, M., Chatterjee, S., Mistry, K. R., Bandyopadhay, S., and Sengupta, K., 2001, “Porous Ceramic Sensor for Measurement of Gas Moisture in the Ppm Range,” Mater. Lett., 49(1), pp. 29–33. [CrossRef]


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

All components are manufactured with aluminum 6061-T6 and stainless steel 304 L

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

All components are manufactured with aluminum 6061-T6

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

A compilation of existing cryostorage devices: (A) MVE Cryosystem's Millennium 2000 has an excellent coolant retention rate (0.095 L/day or 9.5 × 10−5 m3/day evaporation rate), holds 125 vial shaped samples but difficult to remove and replace racks of samples; (B) Taylor–Wharton XT21-AI is almost identical in design to (A) and is designed for rugged field use in equestrian sample collections; (C) Thermo Scientific BioCane Systems are similar in design to (A) and (B). They do incorporate a moveable tower rack handle unlike (A) and (B). (D) Artiko Cryoporter uses a reverse Sterling engineer to act as a refrigerator, does not require liquid nitrogen, is electrically powered with LCD display for monitoring/alerts but is only capable of storing samples at –80  °C (193 K) or above; (E) Optimum Technologies BioArchive uses a sophisticated and complex computerized system but costs significantly higher than devices shown in (A)–(D); (F) Statebourne Cryogenic’s Biostor 5 is similar to (A) and (C) except that it has a much larger access port simplifying user-accessibility but suffers from a much higher liquid nitrogen evaporation rate.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Instrumentation for liquid level measurement in the cryostorage tank (A). This subsystem consists of a capacitance level sensor and transmitter (B), and a liquid level monitor (C).




Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In