Technical Briefs

A Dedicated Low-Cost Fluorescence Microfluidic Device Reader for Point-of-Care Ocular Diagnostics

[+] Author and Article Information
Noah Pestana

Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering,
Northeastern University,
Boston, MA 02115

Adam Hatch, Shashi K. Murthy

Department of Chemical Engineering,
Northeastern University,
Boston, MA 02115

Glenn J. Jaffe

Department of Ophthalmology,
Duke University Eye Center,
P. O. Box 3802, Durham, NC 27710

Mark Niedre

Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering,
Northeastern University,
Boston, MA 02115
e-mail: mniedre@ece.neu.edu

1Corresponding author.

Manuscript received March 26, 2012; final manuscript received December 5, 2012; published online June 24, 2013. Assoc. Editor: Erol Sancaktar.

J. Med. Devices 7(2), 024501 (Jun 24, 2013) (4 pages) Paper No: MED-12-1045; doi: 10.1115/1.4023995 History: Received March 26, 2012; Revised December 05, 2012

Microfluidic fluorescence assay devices show great promise as preclinical and clinical diagnostic instruments. Normally, fluorescence signals from microfluidic chips are quantified by analysis of images obtained with a commercial fluorescence microscope. This method is unnecessarily expensive, time consuming, and requires significant operator training, particularly when considering future clinical translation of the technology. In this work, we developed a dedicated low cost fluorescence microfluidic device reader (FMDR) to read sandwich immunofluorescence assay (sIFA) devices configured to detect vascular endothelial growth factor ligand concentrations in ocular fluid samples. Using a series of sIFA calibration standards and a limited set of human ocular fluid samples, we demonstrated that our FMDR reader has similar sensitivity and accuracy to a fluorescence microscope for this task, with significantly lower total cost and reduced reading time. We anticipate that the reader could be used with minor modifications for virtually any fluorescence microfluidic device.

Copyright © 2013 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Mark, D., Haeberle, S., Roth, G., von Stetten, F., and Zengerle, R., 2010, “Microfluidic Lab-on-a-Chip Platforms: Requirements, Characteristics and Applications,” Chem. Soc. Rev., 39, pp. 1153–1182. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Yager, P., Domingo, G. J., and Gerdes, J., 2008, “Point-of-Care Diagnostics for Global Health,” Ann. Rev. Biomed. Eng., 10, pp. 107–144. [CrossRef]
Vincent, L., 2007, “Microfluidics at the Crossroad With Point-of-Care Diagnostics,” Analyst, 132, pp. 1186–1192. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Whitesides, G. M., 2006, “The Origins and Future of Microfluidics,” Nature, 442, pp. 368–373. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Nicholson, B. P., and Schachat, A. P., 2010, “A Review of Clinical Trials of Anti-VEGF Agents for Diabetic Retinopathy,” Graef. Arch. Clin. Exp. Ophthalmol., 248(7), pp. 915–930. [CrossRef]
Arias, L., Caminal, J. M., Badia, M. B., Rubio, M. J., Catala, J., and Pujol, O., 2010, “Intravitreal Inflizimab in Patients With Macular Degeneration Who are Nonresponders to Antivascular Endothelial Growth Factor,” J. Ret. Vis. Dis., 30, pp. 1601–1608. [CrossRef]
Campochiaro, P. A., Hafiz, G., Channa, R., Shah, S. M., Nguyen, Q. D., Ying, H., Do, D. V., Zimmer-Galler, I., Solomon, S. D., Sung, J. U., and Syed, B., 2010, “Antagonism of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor for Macular Edema Caused by Retinal Vein Occlusions: Two-Year Outcomes,” Ophthalmology, 117(12), pp. 2387–2394. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Jyothi, S., Chowdhury, H., Elagouz, M., and Sivaprasad, S., 2010, “Intravitreal Bevacizumab (Avastin) for Age-Related Macular Degeneration: A Critical Analysis of Literature,” Eye, 24, pp. 816–824. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Nguyen, Q. D., Shah, S. M., Browning, D. J., Hudson, H., Sonkin, P., Hariprasad, S. M., Kaiser, P., Slakter, J. S., Haller, J., Do, D. V., Mieler, W. F., Chu, K., Yang, K., Ingerman, A., Vitti, R. L., Berliner, A. J., Cedarbaum, J. M., and Campochiaro, P. A., 2009, “A Phase I Study of Intravitreal Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Trap-Eye in Patients With Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration,” Ophthalmology, 116, pp. 2141–2148. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Tombran-Tink, J., 2010, “PEDF in Angiogenic Eye Diseases,” Curr. Mol. Med., 10, pp. 267–278. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Weiss, K., Steinbrugger, I., Weger, M., Ardjomand, N., Maier, R., Wegscheider, B. J., Wedrich, A., and El-Shabrawi, Y., 2009, “Intravitreal VEGF Levels in Uveitis Patients and Treatment of Uveitic Macular Oedema With Intravitreal Bevacizumab,” Eye, 23, pp. 1812–1818. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Aiello, L. P., Avery, R. L., Arrigg, P. G., Keyt, B. A., Jampel, H. D., Shah, S. T., Pasquale, L. R., Thieme, H., Iwamoto, M. A., Park, J. E., Nguyen, H. V., Aiello, L. M., Ferrara, N., and KingG. L., 1994, “Vascular Endothelial Growth-Factor in Ocular Fluid of Patients With Diabetic-Retinopathy and Other Retinal Disorders.” N. Engl. J. Med., 331, pp. 1480–1487. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Funk, M., Schmidinger, G., Maar, N., Bolz, M., Benesch, T., Zlabinger, G. J., and Schmidt-Erfurth, U. M., 2010, “Angiogenic and Inflammatory Markers in the Intraocular Fluid of Eyes With Diabetic Macular Edema and Influence of Therapy With Bevacizumab.” Retina, 30, pp. 1412–1419. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Green, J. V., Sun, D., Hafezi-Moghadam, A., Lashkari, K., and Murthy, S. K., 2011, “Microfluidic Pillar Array Sandwich Immunofluorescence Assay for Ocular Diagnostics.” Biomed. Microdev., 13(3), pp. 573–583. [CrossRef]


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

(a) Photograph of the sandwich immune-fluorescence assay device, (b) an example fluorescence microscopy image, showing pillar and channel surfaces coated with a capture antibody and Oregon Green labeling. (c) A schematic diagram and (d) photograph of the dedicated fluorescence reader for the microfluidic devices. The total cost of all system components was approximately $5,000.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Fluorescence measurements from a series of bare-pillar microfluidic device calibration standards filled with 1 to 100 pmol/L Oregon Green solutions, obtained using (a) the FMDR, and (b) fluorescence microscopy. (c) Comparison of readings obtained using the FMDR and fluorescence microscopy.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Fluorescence measurements from a series of microfluidic device calibration standards from 1 to 1000 pg/mL VEGF, obtained using (a) the FMDR, and (b) fluorescence microscopy as a function sample concentration. (c) Comparison of readings obtained using the two methods.



Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In