Design Innovation Paper

Design, Analysis, and Experimental Evaluation of a Novel Three-Fingered Endoscopic Large-Organ Grasper

[+] Author and Article Information
Alireza Mirbagheri

NEF Postdoctoral Fellow
Robotic Surgery Lab.,
Research Centre of Biomedical Technology and Robotics,
Tehran University of Medical Sciences,
Tehran 1419733141, Iran
e-mail: mirbagheri@ieee.org

Farzam Farahmand

Professor of Biomechanics
School of Mechanical Engineering,
Sharif University of Technology and Research Centre of Biomedical Technology and Robotics,
Tehran University of Medical Sciences,
Tehran 11155-9567, Iran
e-mail: farahmand@sharif.edu

1Corresponding author.

Manuscript received September 23, 2011; final manuscript received January 2, 2013; published online June 24, 2013. Assoc. Editor: Foster B. Stulen.

J. Med. Devices 7(2), 025001 (Jun 24, 2013) (6 pages) Paper No: MED-11-1087; doi: 10.1115/1.4023704 History: Received September 23, 2011; Revised January 02, 2013

The currently available laparoscopic instruments are unable to manipulate and grasp the large intra-abdominal organs, such as spleen and kidney, with sufficient stability and safety. This paper describes a novel three-fingered endoscopic instrument, based on parallelogram mechanism, which can fully constrain the large organs and provide an effective grasping function. We first evaluated the efficacy of the design using a 3D model and finite element analysis. Then, a fully functional prototype was fabricated for experimental evaluations, including force propagation and pull force limitation characteristics. Finally, the instrument's capability for effective grasping was investigated on animal specimens in in vitro and in vivo examinations. The results of the force propagation analysis indicated a high amplification ratio of more than 1.2 for the actuating force when grasping large organs. The pull force experiments on a sheep heart specimen revealed a nearly linear relationship between the actuating force and the limit of the pulling force that could be attained without slippage. The resulting pinch force, however, was found to be injurious if the actuating force exceeded a limit of 8.6 N. The in vitro and in vivo examinations of the instrument indicated its capability to pass through a standard 10-mm trocar to enter the abdomen, open its fingers to a diameter of about 80 mm, and grasp and manipulate organs with different sizes, shapes, and properties. With further developments, the proposed design is expected to provide a practical and feasible solution for grasping of large organs during endoscopic operations. However, more preclinical examinations are needed to evaluate the potential risks of using rigid jaws against injury-prone soft organs.

Copyright © 2013 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Williams, Jr., L. F., Chapman, W. C., Bonau, R. A., McGee, Jr., E. C., Boyd, R. W., and Jacobs, J. K., 1993, “Comparison of Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy With Open Cholecystectomy in a Single Center,” Am. J. Surg., 165(4), pp. 459–465. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Bass, E. B., Pitt, H. A., and Lillemoe, K. D., 1993, “Cost-Effectiveness of Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Versus Open Cholecystectomy,” Am. J. Surg., 165(4), pp. 466–471. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Fullum, T., Ladapo, J., Borah, B., and Gunnarsson, C., 2010, “Comparison of the Clinical and Economic Outcomes Between Open and Minimally Invasive Appendectomy and Colectomy: Evidence From a Large Commercial Payer Database,” Surg. Endosc., 24(4), pp. 845–853. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Brokelman, W., Lensvelt, M., Rinkes, I., Klinkenbijl, J., and Reijnen, M., 2011, “Peritoneal Changes Due to Laparoscopic Surgery,” Surg. Endosc., 25(1), pp. 1–9. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Geriffiths, J. R., 2001, “Laparoscopic Instrument With Parallel Actuated Jaws,” U.S. Patent No. 6,238,414.
Frank, T. G., and Cuschieri, A., 1997, “Prehensile Atraumatic Grasper With Intuitive Ergonomics,” Surg. Endosc., 11(10), pp. 1036–1039. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Manasnayakorn, S., Cuschieri, A., and Hanna, G., 2010, “Hand-Assisted Laparoscopic Surgery is Associated With Enhanced Depth Perception in Novices,” Surg. Endosc., 24(11), pp. 2694–2699. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Maartense, S., Bemelman, W. A., Gerritsen van der Hoop, A., Meijer, D. W., and Gouma, D. J., 2004, “Hand-Assisted Laparoscopic Surgery (HALS): A Report of 150 Procedures,” Surg. Endosc., 18(3), pp. 397–401. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Barbaros, U., Dinççağ, A., Sümer, A., Vecchio, R., Rusello, D., Randazzo, V., Issever, H., and Avci, C., 2010, “Prospective Randomized Comparison of Clinical Results Between Hand-Assisted Laparoscopic and Open Splenectomies,” Surg. Endosc., 24(1), pp. 25–32. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Habermalz, B., Sauerland, S., Decker, G., Delaitre, B., Gigot, J. F., Leandros, E., Lechner, K., Rhodes, M., Silecchia, G., Szold, A., Targarona, E., Torelli, P., and Neugebauer, E., 2008, “Laparoscopic Splenectomy: The Clinical Practice Guidelines of the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery (EAES),” Surg. Endosc., 22(4), pp. 821–848. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Schadde, E., Smith, D., Alkoraishi, A., and Begos, D., 2006, “Hand-Assisted Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery (HALS) at a Community Hospital,” Surg. Endosc., 20(7), pp. 1077–1082. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Sata, N., Shiozawa, M., Suzuki, A., Kurihara, K., Ohki, J., and Nagai, H., 2006, “Retroperitoneal Hand-Assisted Laparoscopic Surgery for Endoscopic Adrenalectomy,” Surg. Endosc., 20(5), pp. 830–833. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Lindström, P., Häggman, M., and Wadström, J., 2002, “Hand-Assisted Laparoscopic Surgery (HALS) for Live Donor Nephrectomy Is More Time- and Cost-Effective Than Standard Laparoscopic Nephrectomy,” Surg. Endosc., 16(3), pp. 422–425. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Ortiz, M., 1995, “Manipulable Hand for Laparoscopy,” U.S. Patent No. 5,441,494.
Viola, F. J., Mastri, D. L., Sater, G. A., Young, W. P., and Rende, III, F. M., 1998, “Apparatus and Method for Performing Surgical Tasks During Laparoscopic Procedures,” U.S. Patent No. 5,807,376.
Ohshima, R., Takayama, T., Omata, T., Ohya, T., Kojima, K., Takase, K., and Tanaka, N., 2008, “Assemblable Three Fingered Five-DOF Hand for Laparoscopic Surgery,” IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA'08), Pasadena, CA, May 19–23, pp. 3896–3901 [CrossRef].
Oshima, R., Takayama, T., Omata, T., Kojima, K., Takase, K., and Tanaka, N., 2010, “Assemblable Three-Fingered Nine-Degrees-of-Freedom Hand for Laparoscopic Surgery,” IEEE/ASME Trans. Mechatron., 15(6), pp. 862–870. [CrossRef]
Takayama, T., Omata, T., Futami, T., Akamatsu, H., Ohya, T., Kojima, K., Takase, K., and Tanaka, N., 2007, “Detachable-Fingered Hands for Manipulation of Large Internal Organs in Laparoscopic Surgery,” Proc. of IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA'07), Rome, April 10–14, pp. 244–249. [CrossRef]
Osaki, M., Takayama, T., Omata, T., Ohya, T., Kojima, K., Takase, K., and Tanaka, N., 2009, “Single-Trocar Assemblable Retractor-Hand for Laparoscopic Surgery,” Proc. of IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA'09), Kobe, Japan, May 12–17, pp. 3490–3495 [CrossRef].
Monkman, G. J., Hesse, S., Steinmann, R., and Schunk, H., 2007, Robot Grippers, Wiley-VCH, New York.
Mirbagheri, A., Yahyazadehfar, M., and Farahmand, F., 2010, “Conceptual Design of a Novel Laparoscopic Instrument for Manipulation of Large Internal Organs,” Proceedings of ASME 2010 5th Frontiers in Biomedical Devices Conference, BioMed2010, Newport Beach, CA, September 20–21, pp. 79–80.
Heijnsdijk, E. A. M., DeVisser, H., Dankelman, J., and Gouma, D. J., 2004, “Slip and Damage Properties of Jaws of Laparoscopic Graspers,” Surg. Endosc. Other Interv. Tech., 18(6), pp. 974–979. [CrossRef]
Mirbagheri, A., and Farahmand, F., 2010, “Design and Analysis of an Actuated Endoscopic Grasper for Manipulation of Large Body Organs,” Proceedings of the 32nd Annual International Conference of the Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC), Buenos Aires, Argentina, August 31–September 4. [CrossRef]


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

The parallelogram mechanism of the designed instrument

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

The closed (left) and opened (right) configurations of the designed instrument

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Finite element analysis of the mechanical components of the designed instrument

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

The prototype of the grasper in closed (a) and opened (b) configurations and during grasping of a relatively rigid elliptical object through a 10-mm-diameter port in a phantom test ((c)–(e))

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

The experimental setup to determine the relationship between the actuating force at the handle and the pinch force at a jaw of the instrument

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

The experimental setup to determine the pull force limit for effective grasping of a sheep heart with different actuating forces

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

The analytical and experimental results for the actuating force–pinch force relationship of the designed instrument at three different grasping configurations of small (θ = 30 deg), middle (θ = 45 deg), and large size (θ = 60 deg) body organs

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

The hysteresis of force propagation from instrument handle to its jaws at θ = 45 deg

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

The limit of the pulling force on the grasped organ versus the actuating forces at the instrument handle for effective grasping of a sheep heart specimen

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

The in vivo tests to evaluate the prototype's capability for effective and safe grasping of the intra-abdominal organs of a dog specimen: inserting into the abdomen through a 10-mm trocar (a); opening to grasp the liver (b); grasping the liver (c); manipulating the liver (d); grasping and pulling up the gall bladder (e) and the urinary bladder (f)



Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In