Research Paper

Modeling and Estimating Simulated Burn Depth Using the Perfusion and Thermal Resistance Probe

[+] Author and Article Information
Abdusalam Al-Khwaji

e-mail: alkhwaji@vt.edu

Brian Vick

e-mail: bvick@vt.edu

Tom Diller

e-mail: tdiller@vt.edu
Mechanical Engineering Department,
Virginia Tech,
Blacksburg, VA 24061-0238

Manuscript received November 2, 2012; final manuscript received March 14, 2013; published online July 3, 2013. Assoc. Editor: Rupak K. Banerjee.

J. Med. Devices 7(3), 031003 (Jul 03, 2013) (9 pages) Paper No: MED-12-1137; doi: 10.1115/1.4024160 History: Received November 02, 2012; Revised March 14, 2013

A new thermal perfusion probe operates by imposing a thermal event on the tissue surface and directly measuring the temperature and heat flux response of the tissue with a small sensor. The thermal event is created by convectively cooling the surface with a small group of impinging jets using room temperature air. The hypothesis of this research is that this sensor can be used to provide practical burn characterization of depth and severity by determining the thickness of nonperfused tissue. To demonstrate this capability the measurement system was tested with a phantom tissue that simulates the blood perfusion of tissue. Different thicknesses of plastic were used at the surface to mimic layers of dead tissue. A mathematical model developed by Alkhwaji et al. (2012, “New Mathematical Model to Estimate Tissue Blood Perfusion, Thermal Contact Resistance and Core Temperature,” ASME J. Biomech. Eng., 134, p. 081004) is used to determine the effective values of blood perfusion, core temperature, and thermal resistance from the thermal measurements. The analytical solutions of the Pennes bioheat equation using the Green's function method is coupled with an efficient parameter estimation procedure to minimize the error between measured and analytical heat flux. Seven different thicknesses of plastic were used along with three different flow rates of perfusate to simulate burned skin of the phantom perfusion system. The resulting values of thermal resistance are a combination of the plastic resistance and thermal contact resistance between the sensor and plastic surface. Even with the uncertainty of sensor placement on the surface, the complete set of thermal resistance measurements correlate well with the layer thickness. The values are also nearly independent of the flow rate of the perfusate, which shows that the parameter estimation can successfully separate these two parameters. These results with simulated burns show the value of this minimally invasive technique to measure the thickness of nonperfused layers. This will encourage further work with this method on actual tissue burns.

Copyright © 2013 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Jaskille, A. D., Shupp, J., Jordan, M., and Jeng, J. C., 2009, “Critical Review of Burn Depth Assessment Techniques—Part I: Historical Review,” J. Burn Care Rehabil., 30, pp. 937–947. [CrossRef]
Renkelska, A., Nowakowski, A., Kaczmarek, M., and Ruminski, J., 2006, “Burn Depths Evaluation Based on Active Dynamic IR Thermal Imaging—A Preliminary Study,” Burns, 32, pp. 867–878. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Mileski, W., Atiles, J. L., Purdue, G., Kagan, R., Saffle, J. R., Herndon, D. N., Heimbach, D., Luterman, A., Yurt, R., Goodwin, C., and Hunt, J. L., 2003, “Serial Measurements Increase the Accuracy of Laser Doppler Assessment of Burn Wounds,” J. Burn Care Rehabil., 24, pp. 187–191. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Jeng, J. C., Bridgeman, A., Shivnan, L., Thornton, P., Alam, H., Clarke, T., Jablonski, K., and Jordan, M., 2003, “Laser Doppler Imaging Determines Need for Excision and Grafting in Advance of Clinical Judgment: A Prospective Blinded Trial,” Burns, 29, pp. 665–670. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Stewart, C. J., Frank, R., Forrester, K. R., Tulip, J., Lindsay, R., and Bray, R. C., 2005, “A Comparison of Two Laser-Based Methods for Determination of Burn Scar Perfusion: Laser Doppler Versus Laser Speckle Imaging,” Burns, 31, pp. 744–752. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Jaskille, A. D., Ramella-Roman, J., Shupp, J., Jordan, M., and Jeng, J. C., 2010, “Critical Review of Burn Depth Assessment Techniques—Part II: Review of Laser Doppler Technology,” J. Burn Care Res., 31, pp. 151–157. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Pennes, H. H., 1948, “Analysis of Tissue and Arterial Blood Temperatures in the Resting Human Forearm,” J. Appl. Physiol., 1, pp. 93–122. [PubMed]
Vajkoczy, P., Roth, H., Horn, P., Lucke, T., Taumé, C., Hubner, U., Martin, G. T., Zappletal, C., Klar, E., Schilling, L., and Schmiedek, P., 2000, “Continuous Monitoring of Regional Cerebral Blood Flow: Experimental and Clinical Validation of a Novel Thermal Diffusion Microprobe,” J. Neurosurg., 93, pp. 265–274. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Khot, M. B., Maitz, P. K. M., Phillips, B. R., Bowman, H. F., Pribaz, J. J., and Orgill, D. P., 2005, “Thermal Diffusion Probe Analysis of Perfusion Changes in Vascular Occlusions of Rabbit Pedicle Flaps,” Plast. Reconstr. Surg., 115(4), pp. 1103–1109. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Maitz, P. K. M., Peter, K. M., Khot, M. B., Mayer, H. F., Martin, G. T., Pribaz, J. J., Bowman, H. F., and Orgill, D. P., 2005, “Continuous and Real-Time Blood Perfusion Monitoring in Prefabricated Flaps,” J. Reconstr Microsurg., 20(1), pp. 35–41.
Ricketts, P. L., Mudaliar, A. V., Ellis, B. E., Pullins, C. A., Meyers, L. A., Lanz, O. I., Scott, E. P., and Diller, T. E., 2008, “Non-Invasive Blood Perfusion Measurements Using a Combined Temperature and Heat Flux Probe,” Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, 51, pp. 5740–5748. [CrossRef]
Mudaliar, A. V., Ellis, B. E., Ricketts, P. L., Lanz, O. I., Scott, E. P., and Diller, T. E., 2008, “A Phantom Tissue System for the Calibration of Perfusion Measurements,” ASME J. Biomech. Eng., 130, p. 051002. [CrossRef]
Mudaliar, A. V., Ellis, B. E., Ricketts, P. L., Lanz, O. I., Lee, C. Y., Diller, T. E., and Scott, E. P., 2008, “Non-Invasive Blood Perfusion Measurements of an Isolated Rat Liver and Anesthetized Rat Kidney,” ASME J. Biomech. Eng., 130, p. 061013. [CrossRef]
Alkhwaji, A., Vick, B., and Diller, T., 2012, “New Mathematical Model to Estimate Tissue Blood Perfusion, Thermal Contact Resistance and Core Temperature,” ASME J. Biomech. Eng., 134, p. 081004. [CrossRef]
Diller, K. R., 1992, “Modeling of Bioheat Transfer Processes at High and Low Temperatures,” Adv. Heat Transfer, pp. 157–357. [CrossRef]
Wissler, E. H., 1998, “‘Pennes’ 1948 Paper Revisited,” J. Appl. Physiol., 85, pp. 35–41. [PubMed]
GE Structured Products, 2012, “LEXAN 9034 Product Data Sheet,” http://www.associatedplastics.com/forms/pc_lexan_9034.pdf
Ewing, J., Gifford, A., Hubble, D., Vlachos, P., Wicks, A., and Diller, T., 2010, “A Direct-Measurement Thin-Film Heat Flux Sensor Array,” Meas. Sci. Technol., 21(10), p. 105201. [CrossRef]
Jacquot, A., Lenoir, B., Dauscher, A., Stölzer, M., and Meusel, J., 2002, “Numerical Simulation of the 3ω Method for Measuring the Thermal Conductivity,” J. Appl. Phys., 91, pp. 4733–4738. [CrossRef]


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Perfusion probe situated on simulated tissue

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Modeling a simulated burn depth

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Validation of the two models in predicting blood perfusion of a simulated burn

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Measured temperature from a thermal event

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Sample surface temperature (a) and heat flux signals (b) (5 mils Kapton with 30 cc/min flow rate)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Search process for the optimal estimated parameters

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Initial temperatures for one compartment and two compartments models of 15 mils of plastic

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

Measured burn depth

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Estimated contact resistances with 95% confidence intervals at 30 cc/min flow rate

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Estimated contact resistances with 95% confidence intervals at 15 cc/min flow rate

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Estimated contact resistances with 95% confidence intervals at 5 cc/min flow rate

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Measured blood perfusion values with 95% confidence intervals

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Heat fluxes for two models versus measured heat flux for 15 mils of plastic




Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In