0
Research Papers

Magnetic Torsion Spring Mechanism for a Wireless Biopsy Capsule

[+] Author and Article Information
Massimiliano Simi

The BioRobotics Institute,
Polo Sant'Anna Valdera,
Pisa 56025, Italy
Department of Mechanical Engineering,
Vanderbilt University,
Nashville, TN 37212
e-mail: m.simi@sssup.it

Giada Gerboni

e-mail: g.gerboni@sssup.it

Arianna Menciassi

e-mail: a.menciassi@sssup.it
The BioRobotics Institute,
Polo Sant'Anna Valdera,
Pisa 56025, Italy

Pietro Valdastri

Department of Mechanical Engineering,
Vanderbilt University,
Nashville, TN 37212
e-mail: p.valdastri@vanderbilt.edu

Manuscript received October 2, 2012; final manuscript received July 16, 2013; published online September 24, 2013. Assoc. Editor: William K. Durfee.

J. Med. Devices 7(4), 041009 (Sep 24, 2013) (9 pages) Paper No: MED-12-1122; doi: 10.1115/1.4025185 History: Received October 02, 2012; Revised July 16, 2013

The authors present a novel magnetomechanical elastic element that can be loaded remotely by varying the magnetic field surrounding it and that is able to store and release mechanical energy upon external triggering. The magnetic torsion spring (MTS) is used as the core component of a self-contained miniature biopsy capsule (9 mm in diameter and 24 mm long) for random tissue sampling in the small bowel. Thanks to the MTS concept, the biopsy mechanism can be loaded wirelessly by a magnetic field applied from outside the body of the patient. At the same time, magnetic coupling guarantees stabilization against the small bowel tissue during sampling. Extreme miniaturization is possible with the proposed approach since no electronics and no power supply are required onboard.

Copyright © 2013 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Mubarak, A., Houwen, R. H., and Wolters, V. M., 2012, “Celiac Disease: An Overview From Pathophysiology to Treatment,” Minerva Ped., 64(3), pp. 271–287.
Catassi, C., Kryszak, D., Bhatti, B., Sturgeon, C., Helzlsouer, K., Clipp, S. L., Gelfond, D., Puppa, E., Sferruzza, A., and Fasano, A., 2010, “Natural History of Celiac Disease Autoimmunity in a USA Cohort Followed Since 1974,” Ann. Med.42(7), pp. 530–538. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Tosco, A., Salvati, V., Auricchio, R., Maglio, M., Borrelli, M., Coruzzo, A., Paparo, F., Boffardi, M., Esposito, A., and D'Adamo, G., 2011, “Natural History of Potential Celiac Disease in Children,” Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol., 9(4), pp. 320–325. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Valdastri, P., Simi, M., and Webster, R. J.III, 2010, “Advanced Technologies for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy,” Ann. Rev. Biomed. Eng., 14, pp. 397–429. [CrossRef]
de Ridder, L., Tabbers, M. M., and Escher, J. C., 2012, “Small Bowel Endoscopy in Children,” Best Pract. Res. Clin. Gastroenterol., 26, pp. 337–345. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Nuutinen, H., Kolho, K. L., Salminen, P., Rintala, R., Koskenpato, J., Koivusalo, A., Sipponen, T., and Färkkilä, M., 2011, “Capsule Endoscopy in Pediatric Patients: Technique and Results in Our First 100 Consecutive Children,” Scand. J. Gastroenterol., 46(9), pp. 1138–1143. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Spada, C., Riccioni, M., Urgesi, R., and Costamagna, G., 2008, “Capsule Endoscopy in Celiac Disease,” World J. Gastroenterol., 14(26), pp. 41–46. [CrossRef]
Rokkas, T. T., and Yaron, Y. N., 2012, “The Role of Video Capsule Endoscopy in the Diagnosis of Celiac Disease: A Meta-Analysis,” Eur. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol., 24(3), pp. 303–308. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Ersoy, O., Akin, E., Ugras, S., Buyukasik, S., Selvi, E., and Guney, G., 2009, “Capsule Endoscopy Findings in Celiac Disease,” Digest. Disease. Sci., 54(4), pp. 825–829. [CrossRef]
Catassi, C., and Fasano, A., 2010, “Celiac Disease Diagnosis: Simple Rules are Better Than Complicated Algorithms,” Am. J. Med., 123(8), pp. 691–693. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Ludvigsson, J., Brandt, L., Montgomery, S., Granath, F., and Ekbom, A., 2009, “Validation Study of Villous Atrophy and Small Intestinal Inflammation in Swedish Biopsy Registers,” BMC Gastroenterol., 9(1), p. 19–22. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Crosby, W. H., and Kugler, H. W., 1957, “Intraluminal Biopsy of the Small Intestine,” Dig. Dis. Sci., 2(5), pp. 236–241. [CrossRef]
Kong, K., Cha, J., Jeon, D., and Cho, D. D., 2005, “A Rotational Micro Biopsy Device for the Capsule Endoscope,” Proc. IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS 2005), Edmonton, Canada, August 2–6, pp. 1839–1843. [CrossRef]
Park, S., Koo, K., Bang, S. M., Park, J. Y., Song, S. Y., and Cho, D. D., 2008, “A Novel Microactuator for Microbiopsy in Capsular Endoscopes,” J. Micromech. Microeng., 18, pp. 25–32. [CrossRef]
Kong, K., Yim, S., Choi, S., and Jeon, D., 2012, “A Robotic Biopsy Device for Capsule Endoscopy,” ASME J. Med. Device., 6, pp. 31–40. [CrossRef]
Egorov, V., Schastlivtsev, I., Prut, E., Baranov, A., and Turusov, R., 2002, “Mechanical Properties of the Human Gastrointestinal Tract,” J. Biomech., 35(10), pp. 1417–1425. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Hopper, A., Cross, S., Sanders, D., and Patchy, D., 2008, “Villous Atrophy in Adult Patients With Suspected Gluten-Sensitive Enteropathy: Is a Multiple Duodenal Biopsy Strategy Appropriate?,” Endoscopy, 40(3), pp. 219–224. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Pais, W., Duerksen, D., Pettigrew, N., and Bernstein, C., 2008, “How Many Duodenal Biopsy Specimens are Required to Make a Diagnosis of Celiac Disease?,” Gastrointest. Endosc., 67(7), pp. 1082–1087. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Dewar, D., and Ciclitira, P., 2005, “Clinical Features and Diagnosis of Celiac Disease,” Gastroenterology, 128(4), pp. 19–24. [CrossRef]
Browning, T., and Trier, J., 1963, “Organ Culture of Mucosal Biopsies of Human Small Intestine,” J. Clinical Invest., 48(8), pp. 1423–1432. [CrossRef]
Toennies, J. L., Tortora, G., Simi, M., Valdastri, P., and Webster, R. J.III, 2010, “Swallowable Medical Devices for Diagnosis and Surgery: The State of the Art,” Proc. IMechE C: J. Mech. Eng. Sci., 224(C7), pp. 1397–1414. [CrossRef]
Montague, R., Bingham, C., and Atallah, K., 2011, “Servo Control of Magnetic Gears,” IEEE/ASME Trans. Mechatron., 17(2), pp. 269–278. [CrossRef]
Di Natali, C., Ranzani, T., Simi, M., Menciassi, A., and Valdastri, P., 2012, “Trans-Abdominal Active Magnetic Linkage for Robotic Surgery: Concept Definition and Model Assessment,” Proc. of IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) 2012, St Paul, MN, May 14–18, pp. 695–700. [CrossRef]
Salerno, M., Ciuti, G., Lucarini, G., Rizzo, R., Valdastri, P., Menciassi, A., Landi, A., and Dario, P., 2012, “A Discrete Time Localization Method for Capsule Endoscopy Based on On-Board Magnetic Sensing,” Meas. Sci. Technol., 23, p. 015701. [CrossRef]
International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP), 2009, “Guidelines on Limits of Exposure to Static Magnetic Fields,” Health Phys., 96(4), pp. 504–514. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Rey, J. F., Ogata, H., Hosoe, N., Ohtsuka, K., Ogata, N., Ikeda, K., Aihara, H., Pangtay, I., Hibi, T., Kudo, S. E., and Tajiri, H., 2012, “Blinded Nonrandomized Comparative Study of Gastric Examination With a Magnetically Guided Capsule Endoscope and Standard Videoendoscope,” Gastrointest. Endosc., 75(2), pp. 373–381. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Kummer, M. P., Abbott, J. J., Kratochvil, B. E., Borer, R., Sengul, A., and Nelson, B. J., 2010, “OctoMag: An Electromagnetic Systems for 5-DOF Wireless Micromanipulation,” IEEE Trans. Robotics, 26(6), pp. 1006–1017. [CrossRef]
Ciuti, G., Valdastri, P., Menciassi, A., and Dario, P., 2010, “Robotic Magnetic Steering and Locomotion of Capsule Endoscope for Diagnostic and Surgical Endoluminal Procedures,” Robotica, 28, pp. 199–207. [CrossRef]
“Matesy 3D-Magma,” 2013, Matesy GmbH, Jena, Germany, http://www.3d-magma.de/

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

The basic components of an MTS

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

(a) The MTS torque versus angular displacement of the rotating magnet. (b) The MTS potential energy as a function of the angular displacement of the rotating magnet.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

(a) Wireless biopsy capsule design embedding two MTSs to actuate a cylindrical blade. (b) The application of an external magnetic field loads the MTSs and opens the lateral hole.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Section view of the biopsy capsule operation principle. (a) Applying an external magnetic field the capsule is attracted toward the lumen wall, the lateral hole is open, and the MTSs are loaded. (b) Removing the external magnetic field triggers the MTSs and the blade rotation cuts and stores a tissue sample. (c) Without any external magnetic field, the biopsy capsule is closed and travels along the GI tract under the effect of peristalsis.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

(a) The MTS maximum magnetic torque (θ = ±π/2) as a function of MTS magnet distance obtained by finite element simulation. Scheme of the (b) magnetic configuration and (c) simulation screenshot. Magnet properties, such as shape, dimension, magnetization direction, remanence, and magnetic permeability (μ0 = 1.05) were set into the simulation. The selected mesh consisted of approximately 150,000 elements with a maximum element size set at 1/50 of the maximum geometric feature in the scenario.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

(a) Screenshot for the finite element simulation for θ = 0. The selected mesh consisted of approximately 250,000 elements with a maximum element size set at 1/50 of the maximum geometric feature in the scenario. (b) Sketch of the experimental bench test used to assess Tm2(θ).

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Simulated and experimental trends for Tm2(θ)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Finite element simulation screenshot for estimating the torque exerted by the external permanent magnet on two MTSs located de = 27 mm away on the vertical axis. The two MTSs were spaced ds = 7 mm each other and θ = 0 was assumed. The mesh consisted of approximately 380,000 elements with a maximum element size set at 1/50 of the maximum geometric feature in the scenario.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Sketch of the experimental setup to measure the magnetic attraction force between a capsule embedding two MTSs and the chosen external permanent magnet

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Plot of the magnetic attraction force between the external permanent magnet and the biopsy capsule embedding two MTSs as a function of de. Simulation results for θ = 0 and θ = π superimposed to experimental data.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

(a) Sketch of the experimental setup to estimate the typical volume of the tissue penetrating the lateral hole as a function of the hole diameter. Image of a capsule mock-up, with a 5 mm hole, pressed against an excised porcine small intestine sample.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Top view of (a) the lateral hole and (b) central cross section of the biopsy capsule

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

Plot of the theoretical pressure exerted by the blade on the tissue during cutting for the selected design parameters

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 14

Capsule components: (a, b) the shaft and (c) the blade (d) assembled together. (e) The ruby bushings and (f) the metallic layer assembled in (g) the prototype.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 15

Assembled biopsy capsule prototype laying on graph paper for reference

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 16

Ex vivo trials. (a) The capsule is lifted against the tissue by magnetic interaction with the external magnet, while the MTSs are loaded. (b) Removing the external magnet the MTSs turn the blade, cutting a sample. (c) The lumen wall region where the sample has been removed. (d) The biopsy sample retrieved from the capsule.

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In