Technical Briefs

Time-Action Analysis of Catheter Manipulation During Navigation Tasks in Bifurcations

[+] Author and Article Information
H. C. M. Clogenson

email: H.C.Clogenson@tudelft.nl

J. J. van den Dobbelsteen

Department of Biomechanical Engineering,
Delft University of Technology,
Mekelweg 2,
Delft 2628CD, The Netherlands

1Corresponding author.

Manuscript received December 8, 2012; final manuscript received July 26, 2013; published online September 25, 2013. Assoc. Editor: Rupak K. Banerjee.

J. Med. Devices 7(4), 044501 (Jun 25, 2013) (5 pages) Paper No: MED-12-1152; doi: 10.1115/1.4025188 History: Received December 08, 2012; Revised July 26, 2013

Endovascular intervention is a form of minimally invasive intervention that allows catheters to be placed in practically any location of the vascular tree. However, to provide access to all these remote locations, an extensive array of catheters is needed. A specific catheter is choose based on experience, without any objective indication of its suitability during the actual procedure (Bakker, N. H., Tanase, D., Reekers, J. A., and Grimbergen, C. A., 2002, “Evaluation of Vascular and Interventional Procedures with Time—Action Analysis: A Pilot Study,” J. Vasc. Intervent. Radiol., 13(5), pp. 483–488). The aim of this study is to evaluate several catheters using time-action analysis during a navigation task in bifurcations of various geometries. The relation between the geometry of bifurcations, the catheters, and the time taken to perform specific actions is investigated. Nine novices manipulated five widely used selective catheters with a 0.035” guidewire in a model. In the model, four bifurcations of various diameters and angles were selected. Each bifurcation was cannulated six times with two different yet suitable catheters. The participants had no direct vision of the model but navigated the instruments using the images that were captured by a camera and displayed on a screen. All images presented to the participant were recorded and used for detailed time-action analysis of the various actions to cannulate a branch (e.g., catheter or guidewire retracted, rotated, and advanced). On average, the participants needed 28.3 s to cannulate a branch. When the ratio between the diameter of the main and side branch was high, the average time per task increased significantly, as did the number of attempts to navigate into a branch. However, neither the choice between the two suitable catheters for each bifurcation, nor the angles of the bifurcation made a significant difference in navigation time. Time-action analysis enabled objective measurement of the time spent on various actions to cannulate a branch. The results revealed that most time was spent on retracting and rotating the catheter. This was comparable for all catheters and branches, showing that all the instruments were manipulated in a similar way and presented the same difficulties.

Copyright © 2013 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Fu, Y., Liu, H., Huang, W., Wang, S., and Liang, Z., 2009, “Steerable Catheters in Minimally Invasive Vascular Surgery,” Int. J. Med. Rob. Comput. Assist. Surg., 5(4), pp. 381–391. [CrossRef]
Schneider, P., 2008, Endovascular Skills: Guidewire and Catheter Skills for Endovascular Surgery, Informa Healthcare, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
Bakker, N. H., Tanase, D., Reekers, J. A., and Grimbergen, C. A., 2002, “Evaluation of Vascular and Interventional Procedures With Time–Action Analysis: A Pilot Study,” J. Vasc. Intervent. Radiol., 13(5), pp. 483–488. [CrossRef]
Van Oldenrijk, J., Schafroth, M. U., Bhandari, M., Runne, W. C., and Poolman, R. W., 2008, “Time-Action Analysis (TAA) of the Surgical Technique Implanting the Collum Femoris Preserving (CFP) Hip Arthroplasty. TAASTIC Trial Identifying Pitfalls During the Learning Curve of Surgeons Participating in a Subsequent Randomized Controlled Trial (An Observational Study),” BMC Musculoskeletal Disord., 9(June), p. 93. [CrossRef]
Claus, G. P., Sjoerdsma, W., Jansen, A., and Grimbergen, C. A., 1995, “Quantitative Standardised Analysis of Advanced Laparoscopic Surgical Procedures,” Endosc Surg. Allied Technol., 3(4), pp. 210–213. [PubMed]
Den Boer, K. T., Dankelman, J., Gouma, D. J., and Stassen, H. G., 2001, “Time-Action Analysis of Laparoscopic Procedures—Input for Clinically Driven Instrument Design,” Minimally Invasive Ther. Allied Technol., 10(3), pp. 139–144. [CrossRef]
Kessel, D., and Robertson, I., 2005, Interventional Radiology: A Survival Guide., 2nd ed., Churchill Livingstone, London, pp. 54–58.
Rådegran, G., and Saltin, B., 2000, “Human Femoral Artery Diameter in Relation to Knee Extensor Muscle Mass, Peak Blood Flow, and Oxygen Uptake,” Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol., 278(1), pp. 162–167.
Kaufman, J. A., and Lee, M. J., 2003, Vascular and Interventional Radiology: The Requisites, 1st ed., Saunders, Philadelphia, PA, Chap. 10.
Aytac, S. K., Yigit, H., Sancak, T., and Ozcan, H., 2003, “Correlation Between the Diameter of the Main Renal Artery and the Presence of an Accessory Renal Artery: Sonographic and Angiographic Evaluation,” J. Ultrasound Med., 22(5), pp. 433–439. [PubMed]
Cotin, S., Duriez, C., Lenoir, J., Neumann, P., and Dawson, S., 2005, “New Approaches to Catheter Navigation for Interventional Radiology Simulation,” Med. Image Comput. Comput.-Assist. Intervent., 8(2), pp. 534–542.
Nordon, I. M., Hinchliffe, R. J., Holt, P. J., Loftus, I. M., and Thompson, M. M., 2010, “The Requirement for Smart Catheters for Advanced Endovascular Applications,” J. Eng. Med., 224(6), pp. 743–749. [CrossRef]
Di Marco, A. N., Riga, C. V., Hamady, M., Cheshire, N. J. W., and Bicknell, C. D., 2010, “Robotic and Navigational Technologies in Endovascular Surgery,” Vasc. Dis. Manage., 7(1), pp. E15–E19. Available at http://www.vasculardiseasemanagement.com/content/robotic-and-navigational-technologies-endovascular-surgery


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

The transparent model. The arrows marked A, B, C, C’, and Training show the selected bifurcations that were included in the experiment.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Taxonomy of the actions on the catheter and guidewire. (a) Guidewire retracted. (b) Catheter turned. (c) Catheter retracted. End of (c) catheter in the bifurcation (tip of the catheter is in the bifurcation). (d) Guidewire advanced (in the target artery). (e) Catheter advanced (in the target artery). (f) Miss-guidewire (guidewire advanced in the main branch). (g) Miss-catheter (catheter advanced in the main branch).

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Mean time for one task for each couple (bifurcation-catheter)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Mean cumulated action duration as a percentage of the mean task time, t, per bifurcations



Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In