0
Technical Brief

Developing a Mobile Lower Limb Robotic Exoskeleton for Gait Rehabilitation

[+] Author and Article Information
Zhao Guo

State Key Laboratory of Mechanism System
and Vibration, Institute of Robotics,
Shanghai Jiao Tong University,
Shanghai 200240, China;
Department of Biomedical Engineering,
National University of Singapore,
Singapore 117575, Singapore
e-mail: guozhao@sjtu.edu.cn

Haoyong Yu

Department of Biomedical Engineering,
National University of Singapore,
Singapore 117575, Singapore
e-mail: bieyhy@nus.edu.sg

Yue H. Yin

State Key Laboratory of Mechanism System
and Vibration, Institute of Robotics,
Shanghai Jiao Tong University,
Shanghai 200240, China
e-mail: yhyin@sjtu.edu.cn

1Corresponding author.

Manuscript received August 8, 2013; final manuscript received February 17, 2014; published online xx xx, xxxx. Assoc. Editor: Venketesh N. Dubey.

J. Med. Devices 8(4), 044503 (Aug 19, 2014) (6 pages) Paper No: MED-13-1189; doi: 10.1115/1.4026900 History: Received August 08, 2013; Revised February 17, 2014

A new compact mobile lower limb robotic exoskeleton (MLLRE) has been developed for gait rehabilitation for neurologically impaired patients. This robotic exoskeleton is composed of two exoskeletal orthoses, an active body weight support (BWS) system attached to a motorized mobile base, allowing over-ground walking. The exoskeletal orthosis is optimized to implement the extension and flexion of human hip and knee joints in the sagittal plane. The motor-driven BWS system can actively unload human body weight and track the vertical displacement of the center of mass (COM). This system is compact and easy for therapist to help patient with different weight (up to 100 kg) and height (150–190 cm). Experiments were conducted to evaluate the performance of the robot with a healthy subject. The results show that MLLRE is a useful device for patient to achieve normal over-ground gait patterns.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2014 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Marchal-Crespo, L., and Reinkensmeyer, D. J., 2009, “Review of Control Strategies for Robotic Movement Training After Neurologic Injury,” J. Neuroeng. Rehabil., 6(1), p. 20. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Cai, L. L., Fong, A. J., Otoshi, C. K., Liang, Y. Q., Burdick, J. W., Roy, R. R., and Edgerton, V. R., 2006, “Implications of Assist-as-Needed Robotic Step Training After a Complete Spinal Cord Injury on Intrinsic Strategies of Motor Learning,” J. Neurosci., 26(41), pp. 10564–10568. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Dollar, A. M., and Herr, H., 2008, “Lower Extremity Exoskeletons and Active Orthoses: Challenges and State-of-the-Art,” IEEE Trans. Rob., 24(1), pp. 144–158. [CrossRef]
Strausser, K. A., and Kazerooni, H., 2011, “The Development and Testing of a Human Machine Interface for a Mobile Medical Exoskeleton,” IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS’11), San Francisco, CA, September 25–30, pp. 4911–4916 [CrossRef].
Esquenazi, A., Talaty, M., Packel, A., and Saulino, M., 2012, “The ReWalk Powered Exoskeleton to Restore Ambulatory Function to Individuals With Thoracic-Level Motor-Complete Spinal Cord Injury,” Am. J. Phys. Med. Rehabil., 91(11), pp. 911–921. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Quintero, H. A., Farris, R. J., and Goldfarb, M., 2012, “A Method for the Autonomous Control of Lower Limb Exoskeletons for Persons With Paraplegia,” ASME J. Med. Devices, 6(4), p. 041003. [CrossRef]
Hesse, S., 2008, “Treadmill Training With Partial Body Weight Support After Stroke: A Review,” NeuroRehabilitation, 23(1), pp. 55–65. [PubMed]
Riener, R., Lunenburger, L., Jezernik, S., Anderschitz, M., Colombo, G., and Dietz, V., 2005, “Patient-Cooperative Strategies for Robot-Aided Treadmill Training: First Experimental Results,” IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng., 13(3), pp. 380–394. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Veneman, J. F., Kruidhof, R., Hekman, E. E. G., Ekkelenkamp, R., Asseldonk, E. H. F. V., and van der Kooij, H., 2007, “Design and Evaluation of the LOPES Exoskeleton Robot for Interactive Gait Rehabilitation,” IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng., 15(3), pp. 379–386. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Banala, S. K., Kim, S. H., Agrawal, S. K., and Scholz, J. P., 2009, “Robot Assisted Gait Training With Active Leg Exoskeleton (ALEX),” IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng., 17(1), pp. 2–8. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Stauffer, Y., Allemand, Y., Bouri, M., Fournier, J., Clavel, R., Metrailler, P., Brodard, R., and Reynard, F., 2009, “The WalkTrainer–A New Generation of Walking Reeducation Device Combining Orthoses and Muscle Stimulation,” IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng., 17(1), pp. 38–45. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Wang, P., Low, K. H., Tow, A., and Lim, P. H., 2011, “Initial System Evaluation of an Overground Rehabilitation Gait Training Robot (NaTUre-gaits),” Adv. Rob., 25(15), pp. 1927–1948 [CrossRef].
Patton, J., Brown, D. A., Peshkin, M., Santos-Munne, J. J., Makhlin, A., Lewis, E., Colgate, J. E., and Schwandt, D., 2008, “KineAssist: Design and Development of a Robotic Overground Gait and Balance Therapy Device,” Top Stroke Rehabil., 15(2), pp. 131–139. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Perry, J., and Davids, J. R., 1992, “Gait Analysis: Normal and Pathological Function,” J. Pediatr. Orthop., 12(6), p. 815. [CrossRef]
Saini, M., Kerrigan, D. C., Thirunarayan, M. A., and Duff-Raffaele, M., 1998, “The Vertical Displacement of the Center of Mass During Walking: A Comparison of Four Measurement Methods,” ASME J. Biomech. Eng., 120(1), pp. 133–139. [CrossRef]
Jezernik, S., Colombo, G., and Morari, M., 2004, “Automatic Gait-Pattern Adaptation Algorithms for Rehabilitation With a 4-DOF Robotic Orthosis,” IEEE Rob. Autom. Mag., 20(3), pp. 574–582. [CrossRef]
Yin, Y. H., Fan, Y. J., and Xu, L. D., 2012, “EMG and EPP-Integrated Human-Machine Interface Between the Paralyzed and Rehabilitation Exoskeleton,” IEEE Trans. Inf. Technol. Biomed., 16(4), pp. 542–549. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Guo, Z., Fan, Y. J., Zhang, J. J., Yu, H., and Yin, Y. H., 2012, “A New 4M Model-Based Human-Machine Interface for Lower Extremity Exoskeleton Robot,” 5th International Conference on Intelligent Robotics and Applications (ICIRA’12), Montreal, QC, Canada, October 3–5, pp. 545–554 [CrossRef].
Duschau-Wicke, A., von Zitzewitz, J., Caprez, A., Lunenburger, L., and Riener, R., 2010, “Path Control: A Method for Patient-Cooperative Robot-Aided Gait Rehabilitation,” IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng., 18(1), pp. 38–48. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Schematic graph of the MLLRE: (a) robotic gait orthosis, (b) mobile base combining with BWS system, and (c) the integrated structure of the robotic system

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

CAD models of the MLLRE: (a) robotic gait orthosis, (b) mobile base incorporating with BWS system, and (c) the integrated robotic system

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Schematic graph of three different robotic orthosis: four-bar linkage mechanism in LOKOMAT (a), in ALEX (b), offset slider-crank mechanism in our MLLRE (c), and (d) the definition of knee and hip joint angles with the positive direction indicated

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Robotic orthosis: (a) the side view and (b) the 45 deg view of the CAD model

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

(a) A labeled schematic of the offset slider-crank mechanism, x is the slider displacement, l1 is the crank length, l2 is the connecting rod length, l3 is the length from the slider center to the rotation center along the x direction, e is the eccentricity, and H is the stroke of the slider. θ, ϕ, and γ are the crank angle, connecting rod angle, and transmission angle, respectively. F1 is the active force produced by the ball screw and F2 is the force acted on the connecting rod. (b) Relationship between the crank angle and the joint angle, we define θch, θck as the crank angle in the hip and knee, respectively. (c) The mechanical diagram of the robotic orthosis. dt is the distance between the hip joint and the mass center of the thigh, dc is the distance between the knee joint and the mass center of the calf, α and β are eccentric angles of the mass center away from the centerline of the thigh and calf, Th and Tk are the joint required torques, Ft and Fc are the interaction forces, lt and lc are the interaction force arms, mt is the mass of the thigh(including the motor), and mc is the mass of the calf.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

CAD models of the BWS system

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Pressure and sEMG sensors

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

(a) The limit switches in trunk segment and (b) the width adjustable device designed to adjust the distance between two orthoses

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

(a) The gait angle and required torque on hip and knee joints, and (b) the flow diagram of the position control

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Prototype of the MLLRE, its major components labeled

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Experiments with two gait cycles on a healthy subject, (solid line and dotted line represent the reference and real angles), (a) hip joint tracking, (b) knee joint tracking, and (c) COM tracking

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In