0
Research Papers

Bone Anchors—A Preliminary Finite Element Study of Some Factors Affecting Pullout

[+] Author and Article Information
C. M. Hughes

School of Engineering and Design,
Brunel University,
Uxbridge UB8 3PH, UK
e-mail: chris.hughes@brunel.ac.uk

A. Bordush

Stryker Osteosynthesis,
Schönkirchen 24232, Germany
e-mail: Astrid.Bordush@gmail.com

B. Robioneck

Stryker Osteosynthesis,
Schönkirchen 24232, Germany
e-mail: Bernd.Robioneck@stryker.com

P. Procter

Stryker Osteosynthesis,
Schönkirchen 24232, Germany
e-mail: philip.procter@stryker.com

C. J. Brown

School of Engineering and Design,
Brunel University,
Uxbridge UB8 3PH, UK
e-mail: chris.brown@brunel.ac.uk

1Corresponding author.

Manuscript received October 21, 2013; final manuscript received February 12, 2014; published online xx xx, xxxx. Assoc. Editor: Rita M. Patterson.

J. Med. Devices 8(4), 041006 (Aug 19, 2014) (9 pages) Paper No: MED-13-1262; doi: 10.1115/1.4026901 History: Received October 21, 2013; Revised February 12, 2014

Bone anchors (or suture anchors) are used to provide attachment points for sutures to connect tissue such as tendons or ligaments to bone, and work by engaging a threaded portion—sometimes tapered—to the cancellous and/or cortical bone. Such repair is often needed after trauma, or as part of reconstructive surgery. This paper uses the finite element method to compare the pullout characteristics of one common type of bone anchor in different cancellous bone structures. Finite element models are created by using computed tomography (CT) scans of cancellous bone and building computer-aided design (CAD) models to define the cancellous bone geometry. Orthopedic surgeons will sometimes remove parts of the cortical shell and this paper also examines the mechanical effects of decortication. Furthermore, the importance of the connection between anchor and cortical layer is examined. One of the key outcomes from the model is that the coefficient of friction between bone and anchor determines potential mechanisms of pullout. The stiffness of anchors and the effect of the cortical layer are presented for different pullout angles to obtain the theoretical response. The results show the detailed modeling that includes the micro-architecture of the cancellous bone is necessary to capture the large variations that can exist.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2014 by ASME
Topics: Bone , Density
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Barber, F. A., Herbert, M. A., Coons, D. A., and Boothby, M. H., 2006, “Sutures and Suture Anchors—Update 2006,” Arthroscopy: J. Arthroscopic Relat. Surg., 22(10), pp. 1063–1069. [CrossRef]
Barber, A., Herbert, M. A., Beavis, C., and Oro, F. B., 2008, “Suture Anchor Materials, Eyelets, and Designs: Update 2008,” Arthroscopy: J. Arthroscopic Relat. Surg., 24(8), pp. 859–867. [CrossRef]
Tan, C. K., Guisasola, I., Machani, B., Kemp, G., Sinopidis, C., Brownson, P., and Frostick, S., 2006, “Arthroscopic Stabilization of the Shoulder: A Prospective Randomized Study of Absorbable Versus Non-Absorbable Suture Anchors,” Arthroscopy, 22(7), pp. 716–720. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Cummins, C. A., and Murrell, G. A., 2003, “Mode of Failure for Rotator Cuff Repair With Suture Anchors Identified at Revision Surgery,” J. Shoulder Elbow Surg., 12(2), pp. 128–133. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Bynum, C. K., Lee, S., Mahar, A., Tasto, J., and Pedowitz, R., 2005, “Failure Mode of Suture Anchors as a Function of Insertion Depth,” Am. J. Sports Med., 33(7), pp. 1030–1034. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Yakacki, C. M., Poukalova, M., Guldberg, R. E., Lin, A., Saing, M., Gillogy, S., and Gall, K., 2010, “The Effect of the Trabecular Microstructure on the Pullout Strength of Suture Anchors,” J. Biomech., 43, pp 1953–1959. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Hildebrand, T., and Rüegsegger, P., 1997, “Quantification of Bone Microarchitecture With the Structure Model Index,” Comput. Methods Biomech. Biomed. Eng., 1(1), pp. 15–23. [CrossRef]
Tingart, M. J., Apreleva, M., Lehtinen, J., Zurakowski, D., and Warner, J. J., 2004, “Anchor Design and Bone Mineral Density Affect the Pullout Strength of Suture Anchors in Rotator Cuff Repair: Which Anchors are Best to Use in Patients With Low Bone Quality?,” Am. J. Sports Med., 32(6), pp. 1466–1473. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Poukalova, M., Yakacki, C. M., Guldberg, R. E., Lin, A., Saing, M., Gillogly, S. D., and Gall, K., 2010, “Pullout Strength of Suture Anchors: Effect of Mechanical Properties of Trabecular Bone,” J. Biomech., 43(6), pp. 1138–1145. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Asnis, S. E., Ernberg, J. J., Bostrom, M., Wright, T. M., Harrington, R. M., Tencer, A., and Peterson, M., 1996, “Cancellous Bone Screw Thread Design and Holding Power,” J. Orthop. Trauma, 10(7), pp. 462–469. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Chapman, J. R., Harrington, R. M., Lee, K. M., Anderson, P. A., Tencer, A. F., and Kowalski, D., 1996, “Factors Affecting the Pullout Strength of Cancellous Bone,” ASME J. Biomech. Eng., 118(3), pp. 391–398. [CrossRef]
Larsson, S., and Procter, P., 2011, “Optimising Implant Anchorage (Augmentation) During Fixation of Osteoporotic Fractures: Is There a Role for Bone-Graft Substitutes?,” Inj. Int. J. Care Inj., 42(S2), pp. S72–S76. [CrossRef]
Ramaswamy, R., Evans, S., and Kosashvili, Y., 2010, “Holding Power of Variable Pitch Screws in Osteoporotic, Osteopenic and Normal Bone: Are All Screws Created Equal?,” Injury, 41(2), pp. 179–183. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Seebeck, J., Goldhahn, J., Morlock, M. M., and Schneider, E., 2005, “Mechanical Behavior of Screws in Normal and Osteoporotic Bone,” Osteoporosis Int., 16(2S), pp. S107–S111. [CrossRef]
Patel, P. S. D., Shepherd, D. E. T., and Hukins, D. W. L., 2010, “The Effect of Screw Insertion Angle and Thread Type on the Pullout Strength of Bone Screws in Normal and Osteoporotic Cancellous Bone Models,” Med. Eng. Phys., 32(8), pp. 822–828. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Huiskes, R., and Chao, E. Y. S., 1983, “A Survey of Finite Element Analysis in Orthopedic Biomechanics: The First Decade,” J. Biomech., 16(6), pp. 385–409. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Helgason, B., Taddei, F., Pálsson, H., Schileo, E., Cristofolini, L., Viceconti, M., and Brynjólfsson, S., 2008, “A Modified Method for Assigning Material Properties to FE Models of Bones,” Med. Eng. Phys., 30(4), pp. 444–453. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Wirth, A. J., Muller, R., and van Lenthe, G. H., 2012, “The Discrete Nature of Trabecular Bone Microarchitecture Affects Implant Stability,” J. Biomech., 45(6), pp. 1060–1067. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Goldstein, S. A., Wilson, D. L., Sonstegarij, D. A., and Matthews, L. S., 1983, “The Mechanical Properties of Human Tibial Trabecular Bone as a Function of Metaphyseal Location,” J. Biomech., 16(12), pp. 965–969. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Keaveny, T. M., Morgan, E. F., Niebur, G. L., and Yeh, O. C., 2001, “Biomechanics of Trabecular Bone,” Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng., 3, pp. 307–333. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Chen, S. I., Lin, R. M., and Chang, C. H., 2003, “Biomechanical Investigation of Pedicle Screw-Vertebrae Complex: A Finite Element Approach Using Bonded and Contact Interface Conditions,” Med. Eng. Phys., 25(4), pp. 275–282. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Melchels, F. P. W., Bertoldi, K., Gabbrielli, R., Velders, A. H., Feijen, J., and Grijpma, D. W., 2010, “Mathematically Defined Tissue Engineering Scaffold Architectures Prepared by Stereolithography,” Biomaterials, 31(27), pp. 6909–6916. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Brown, C. J., MacInnes, R. A., Day, A., Hess, B., and Procter, P., 2013, “An Approximate Model for Cancellous Bone Screw Fixation,” Comput. Methods Biomech. Biomed. Eng., 16(4), pp. 443–450. [CrossRef]
Ansys, 2012, Ansys® Academic Research, Release 13, Ansys Inc., Canonsburg, PA.
Mimics®, v14.0, Materialise NV, Leuven, Belgium.
Hara, T., Tanck, E., Homminga, J., and Huiskes, R., 2002, “The Influence of Microcomputed Tomography Threshold Variations on the Assessment of Structural and Mechanical Trabecular Bone Properties,” Bone, 31(1), pp. 107–109. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Kim, C. H., Zhang, H., Mikhail, G., von Stechow, D., Muller, R., Kim, H. S., Guo, X. E., 2007, “Effects of Thresholding Techniques on MicroCT-Based Finite Element Models of Trabecular Bone,” ASME J. Biomech. Eng., 129(4), pp. 481–486. [CrossRef]
Guo, X. E., and Kim, C. H., 2002, “Mechanical Consequence of Trabecular Bone Loss and Its Treatment: A Three-Dimensional Model Simulation,” Bone, 30(2), pp. 404–411. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
van der Linden, J. C., Verhaar, J. A., and Weinans, H., 2002, “A Three-Dimensional Simulation of Age-Related Remodeling in Trabecular Bone,” J. Bone Miner. Res., 16(4), pp. 688–696. [CrossRef]
Doube, M., Kłosowski, M. M., Arganda-Carreras, I., Cordelières, F., Dougherty, R. P., Jackson, J. S., Schmid, B., Hutchinson, J. R., and Shefelbine, S. J., 2010, “BoneJ: Free and Extensible Bone Image Analysis in ImageJ,” Bone, 47(6), pp. 1076–1079. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Stryker, 2013, “Titanium—Titanium Wedge,” available at: http://www.stryker.com/en-us/products/Orthopaedics/SportsMedicine/UpperExtremity/Anchors/Titanium/TitaniumWedgeAnchor/index.htm, accessed November 1, 2012.
ArthroCare Sports Medicine, 2012, see http://international.arthrocaresportsmedicine.com/files/technique_guides/A50_4001D.pdf, accessed November 1, 2012.
Ashman, R. B., Cowin, S. C., Van Buskirk, W. C., and Rice, J. C., 1984, “A Continuous Wave Technique for the Measurement of the Elastic Properties of Cortical Bone,” J. Biomech., 17(6), pp. 349–361. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Turner, C. H., Rho, J., Takano, Y., Tsui, T. Y., and Pharr, G. M., 1999, “The Elastic Properties of Trabecular and Cortical Bone Tissues are Similar: Results From Two Microscopic Measurement Techniques,” J. Biomech., 32(4), pp. 437–441. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Rincon Kohli, L., 2003, “Identification of a Multiaxial Failure Criterion for Human Trabecular Bone,” PhD thesis, Faculté Sciences et Technique de l'Ingénieur, Institut de Genie Biomedical, Section de Genie Mécanique, Ecole Polytechnique Federale de Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Yakacki, C. M, Griffis, F., Poukalova, M., and Gall, K., 2009, “Bearing Area: A New Indication for Suture Anchor Pullout Strength?,” J. Orthop. Res., 27(8), pp. 1048–1054. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Asnis, S. E., and Kyle, R. F., 1996, Cannulated Screw Fixation: Principles and Operative Techniques, Springer, New York.

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

(a) Image of low BV/TV. (b) Image of higher BV/TV.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Clockwise from top left: isometric view of piece of bone, with anchor inserted, contact area shown on anchor, the final construct

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Anchor with dimensions

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

(a) Contact region in higher apparent density bone. (b) Contact region in lower apparent density bone.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Variation of peak reaction force with friction coefficient

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Upper surface of anchor at increasing load. Left: low friction coefficient. Right: higher friction coefficient.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Variation of reaction force with cortical thickness for two apparent densities, with engaged and nonengaged anchors (a) vertical load, (b) load at 45 deg, (c) load at 72.5 deg, and (d) load horizontal

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Slice showing deformation under (a) vertical load and (b) horizontal load

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Elements in contact with increasing displacement for vertical and horizontal loads

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

(a) Variation of reaction force (N) with angle for low apparent density bone. (b) Variation of reaction force (N) with angle for higher apparent density bone.

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In