0
Technical Brief

Preliminary Development of a Robust Multilink Modular Robotic System for Improvement of Colonoscopy Intubation Process1

[+] Author and Article Information
Kaiqiang Liu, Corey D. Sheerer

Department of Mechanical Engineering,
Ohio University,
Athens, OH 45701

Junghun Choi

Department of Mechanical Engineering
and Biomedical Engineering,
Ohio University,
Athens, OH 45701

Accepted and presented at the Design of Medical Devices Conference (DMD2014), Minneapolis, MN, April 7–10, 2014. DOI: 10.1115/1.4027075

Manuscript received February 21, 2014; final manuscript received March 3, 2014; published online July 21, 2014. Editor: Arthur G. Erdman.

J. Med. Devices 8(3), 030930 (Jul 21, 2014) (2 pages) Paper No: MED-14-1081; doi: 10.1115/1.4027075 History: Received February 21, 2014; Revised March 03, 2014

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview
FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
Copyright © 2014 by ASME
Topics: Sensors , Robotics , Shapes
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Ravindra, V. K., 2012, “Evaluation of an Active Colonoscopy Training Model,” Master's thesis, Ohio University, Athens, OH.
Hsieh, Y. H., Zhou, A. L., and Lin, H. J., 2008, “Long Pediatric Colonoscope Versus Intermediate Length Adult Colonoscope for Colonoscopy,” J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol., 23(7), pp. e7–e10. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Raju, G. S., Rex, D. K., Kozarek, R. A., Ahmed, I., Brining, D., and Pasricha, P. J., 2004, “A Novel Shape-Locking Guide for Prevention of Sigmoid Looping During Colonoscopy,” Gastrointest. Endosc., 59(3), pp. 416–419. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Vucelic, B., Rex, D., Pulanic, R., Pfefer, J., Hrstic, I., Levin, B., Halpern, Z., and Arber, N., 2006, “The Aer-O-Scope: Proof of Concept of a Pneumatic, Skill-Independent, Self-Propelling, Self-Navigating Colonoscope,” Gastroenterology, 130(3), pp. 672–677. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Phee, L., Accoto, D., Menciassi, A., Stefanini, C., Carrozza, M. C., and Dario, P., 2002, “Analysis and Development of Locomotion Devices for the Gastrointestinal Tract,” IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., 49(6), pp. 613–616. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

3D model of the inner structure of one module, the tilt bracket conduct motion, and connects to other modules when necessary

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

The distance between the three sensors on the distal module and the wall of the track, the track is divided into four parts known as intervals A–D; they are marked in Fig. 3(a), the total insertion time is 144 s, data collection frequency is 10 Hz

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Feasibility test in an open track, the scale of the track (mentioned in Sec. 2) is similar to human colon, four intervals, A–D marked in (a) are corresponding to those described in Fig. 2

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In