0
Research Papers

Determination of Optimal Counter-Mass Location in Active Prostheses for Transfemoral Amputees to Replicate Sound Limb Swing

[+] Author and Article Information
M. Telwak

Department of Biomedical Engineering,
Marquette University,
1637 West Wisconsin Avenue,
Milwaukee, WI 53233
e-mail: MTelwak@gmail.com

P. Voglewede

Department of Mechanical Engineering,
Marquette University,
1637 West Wisconsin Avenue,
Milwaukee, WI 53233
e-mail: Philip.Voglewede@Marquette.edu

M. B. Silver-Thorn

Department of Biomedical
and Mechanical Engineering,
Marquette University,
1637 West Wisconsin Avenue,
Milwaukee, WI 53233
e-mail: Barbara.Silver-Thorn@Marquette.edu

Manuscript received August 22, 2013; final manuscript received March 8, 2014; published online August 19, 2014. Assoc. Editor: Rita M. Patterson.

J. Med. Devices 8(4), 041003 (Aug 19, 2014) (7 pages) Paper No: MED-13-1199; doi: 10.1115/1.4027231 History: Received August 22, 2013; Revised March 08, 2014

Recent advances in lower limb prostheses have involved the design of active, powered prosthetic knee and ankle-foot components capable of generating knee and ankle torques similar to that of normal gait. The associated componentry results in increased mass of the respective prosthesis, which affects the swing phase of gait. The goal of this study was to develop a computer model of the transfemoral residual limb and prosthesis, inclusive of an active ankle-foot, and investigate counter-mass magnitude(s) and location(s) via model optimization that might improve lower limb kinematic symmetry between the residual/prosthetic limb (approximated by the computer model) and the sound limb (approximated by able-bodied motion data) during swing phase. Single- (thigh only, shank only) and multisegment (both thigh and shank) optimization of counter-mass magnitudes and locations indicated that a 2.0 kg counter-mass added 8 cm distal and 10 cm posterior to the distal end of the knee unit within the shank segment approximated knee kinematics of the sound limb. This counter-mass location, however, reduced hip flexion during swing phase. While such a counter-mass location and magnitude demonstrated theoretical potential, the location is not clinically realistic; mass can only be practically added within the prosthesis, distal to the residual limb. Clinically, realistic counter-masses must also keep the total prosthetic mass to less than 5 kg; greater mass may require supplemental prosthetic suspension, may increase energy expenditure during ambulation and may increase the likelihood of fatigue, even with active prosthetic components. The ability to simulate the kinematic effects of active prosthetic components, inclusive of varying placement of battery and signal conditioning units, may advance the design of active prostheses that will minimize kinematic asymmetry and result in greater patient acceptance.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2014 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

NLLIC, 2008, Limb Loss in the United States Fact Sheet, National Limb Loss Information Center and the Limb Loss Research and Statistics Program, Amputee Coalition of America, Manassas, VA.
Dillingham, T. R., Pezzin, L. E., and MacKenzie, E. J., 2002, “Limb Amputation and Limb Deficiency: Epidemiology and Recent Trends in the United States,” Southern Med. J., 95(8), pp. 875–883.
Seroussi, R. E., Gitter, A. J., Czerniecki, J. M., and Weaver, K., 1996, “Mechanical Work Adaptations of Above Knee Amputee Ambulation,” Archiv. Phys. Med. Rehabil., 77(11), pp. 1209–1214. [CrossRef]
Murray, M. P., Sepic, S. B., Gardner, G. M., and Mollinger, L. A., 1980, “Gait Patterns of Above-Knee Amputees Using Constant-Friction Knee Components,” Bull. Prosth. Res. BPR 10–34, 17(2), pp. 35–45.
Murray, M. P., Mollinger, L. A., Sepic, S. B., Gardner, G. M., and Linder, M. T., 1983, “Gait Patterns in Above-Knee Amputee Patients: Hydraulic Swing Control vs Constant-Friction Knee Components,” Archiv. Phys. Med. Rehabil., 64(8), pp. 339–345.
Nolan, L., and Lees, A., 2000, “The Functional Demands on the Intact Limb During Walking for Active Trans-Femoral and Trans-Tibial Amputees,” Prosth. Ortho. Int., 24(2), pp. 117–125. [CrossRef]
Perry, J., and Burnfiend, J. M., 2010, Gait Analysis: Normal and Pathological Function, SLACK, Inc., Thorofare, NJ.
Waters, R. L., Hislop, H. J., Perry, J., Thomas, L., and Campbell, J., 1983, “Comparative Cost of Walking in Young and Old Adults,” J. Orthopaed. Res., 1(1), pp. 73–76. [CrossRef]
Hollander, K. W., Ilg, R., Sugar, T. G., and Herring, D., 2006, “An Efficient Robotic Tendon for Gait Assistance,” ASME J. Biomech. Eng., 128(5), pp. 788–791. [CrossRef]
Bellman, D., Holgate, M. A., and Sugar, T. G., 2008, “SPARKy 3: Design of an Active Robotic Ankle Prosthesis with Two Actuated Degrees of Freedon Using Regenerative Kinetics,” 2nd IEEE/RAS-EMBS International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics (BioRob 2008), Scottsdale, AZ, October 19–22, pp. 511–516. [CrossRef]
Bergelin, B. J., Mattos, J. O., WellsJr., J. G., and Voglewede, P. A., 2012, “Concept Through Preliminary Bench Testing of a Powered Lower Limb Prosthetic Device,” ASME J. Mech. Robot., 2(4), p. 041005. [CrossRef]
Bergelin, B. J., and Voglewede, P. A., 2012, “Design of an Active Ankle-Foot Prosthesis Utilizing a Four-Bar Mechanism,” ASME J. Mech. Des., 134(6), p. 061004 [CrossRef].
Au, S. K., Weber, J., and Herr, H., 2007, “Biomechanical Design of a Powered Ankle-Foot Prosthesis,” IEEE 10th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics (ICORR 2007), Noordwijk, Netherlands, June 13–15, pp. 298–303. [CrossRef]
Au, S. K., Herr, H., Weber, J., and Martinez-Villalpando, E. C., 2007, “Powered Ankle-Foot Prosthesis for the Improvement of Amputee Ambulation,” 29th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBS 2007), Lyon, France, August 22–26, pp. 3020–3026. [CrossRef]
Au, S. K., Berniker, M., and Herr, H., 2008, “Powered Ankle-Foot Prosthesis to Assist Level-Ground and Stair Descent Gaits,” Neural Netw., 21(4), pp. 654–666. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Au, S. K., Weber, J., and Herr, H., 2009, “Powered Ankle-Foot Prosthesis Improves Walking Metabolic Economy,” IEEE Trans. Robot., 25(1), pp. 51–66. [CrossRef]
Sup, F., Varol, H. A., and Goldfarb, M., 2011, “Upslope Walking With a Powered Knee and Ankle Prosthesis: Initial Results With an Amputee Subject,” IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng., 19(1), pp. 71–78. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Sup, F., Varol, H. A., Mitchell, J., and Withrow, T., 2008, “Design and Control of an Active Electrical Knee and Ankle Prosthesis,” 2nd IEEE/RAS-EMBS International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics (BioRob 2008), Scottsdale, AZ, October 19–22, pp. 523–528. [CrossRef]
Mena, D., Mansour, J. M., and Simon, S. R., 1980, “Analysis and Synthesis of Human Swing Leg Motion During Gait and Its Clinical Applications,” J. Biomech., 14(12), pp. 823–832. [CrossRef]
Tsai, C. S., and Mansour, J. M., 1986, “Swing Phase Simulation and Design of Above Knee Prostheses,” ASME J. Biomech. Eng., 108(1), pp. 65–72. [CrossRef]
Beck, J. C., and Czerniecki, J., 1994, “A Method for Optimization of Above-Knee Prosthetic Shank-Foot Inertial Characteristics,” Gait Posture, 2(2), pp. 75–84. [CrossRef]
Tashman, S., Hicks, R., and Jendrzejczyk, D., 1985, “Evaluation of a Prosthetic Shank With Variable Inertial Properties,” Clin. Prosth. Ortho., 9(3), pp. 23–28.
Hale, S. A., 1990, “Analysis of the Swing Phase Dynamics and Muscular Effort of the Above-Knee Amputee for Varying Prosthetic Shank Loads,” Prosth. Ortho. Int., 14(3), pp. 125–135. [CrossRef]
Gitter, A., Czerniecki, J., and Meinders, M., 1997, “Effect of Prosthetic Mass on Swing Phase Work During Above-Knee Amputee Ambulation,” Am. J. Phys. Med. Rehabil., 76(2), pp. 114–121. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Czerniecki, J. M., Gitter, A., and Weaver, K., 1994, “Effects of Alterations in Prosthetic Shank Mass on the Metabolic Costs of Ambulation in Above-Knee Amputees,” Am. J. Phys. Med. Rehabil., 73(5), pp. 338–342. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Russell, D., 2012, “Swing Weight of Baseball and Softball Bats,” Phys. Teach., 48(7), pp. 471–474. [CrossRef]
“What are the Details of the Woltring Filter?,” 2013, Vicon, Edgewood, NY, accessed September 2, 2013, http://www.metrics.co.uk/support/solution_view.php?id=1098
Telwak, M., 2013, “Determination of Optimal Counter-Mass Location in Active Prostheses for Transfemoral Amputees to Replicate Normal Swing,” Master's thesis, Marquette University, Milwaukee, WI.
Winter, D. A., 1990, Biomechanics and Motor Control of Human Movement, 2nd ed., Wiley, New York, pp. 56–57.
Boyda Glaister, C. L., 2005, “A Functional Comparison of Two Types of Prosthetic Knee Designs,” Master's thesis. Marquette University, Milwaukee, WI.
Malanga, G., and Delisa, J. A., 1998, “Clinical Observation,” Gait Analysis in the Science of Rehabilitation, U.S., Department of Veterans Affairs, Washington, DC, pp. 1–11.
Jaegers, S. M., Arendzen, J. H., and Jongh, H. J. d., 1996, “An Electromyographic Study of the Hip Muscles of Transfemoral Amputees in Walking,” Clin. Ortho. Related Res., 328, pp. 119–128. [CrossRef]
Hong, J. H., and Mun, M. S., 2005, “Relationship Between Socket Pressure and EMG of Two Muscles in Trans-Femoral Stumps During Gait,” Prosth. Ortho. Int., 29(1), pp. 59–72. [CrossRef]
Czerniecki, J. M., 1996, “Rehabilitation in Limb Deficiency. 1. Gait and Motion Analysis,” Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil., 77(3 Suppl.), pp. S3–S8. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

(a) Physical model of the TF amputee residual/prosthetic limb, respective marker locations (filled circles) for motion analysis and approximate locations of the thigh and shank segment COM (white diamond). (b) Close-up of the physical model suspension, pseudoresidual limb with uniaxial hip joint and prosthetic socket.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Double pendulum model of the lower limb including hip, knee, and ankle joints. Thigh (ψT) and shank (ψS) angles were defined with respect to the horizontal; hip (θH) motion was defined relative to vertical. The knee (θK) angle was the relative angle between the thigh and shank segments. The ankle angle, between the shank and foot segments, was fixed at 90 deg.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Piecewise linear approximation of normalized TF amputee residual limb hip torque [30]. The vertical line represents the transition from preswing (late stance) to initial swing.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Potential counter-mass locations at the distal thigh and proximal shank segments, defined relative to the hip joint and distal end of the knee unit. Location fields included both proximal/distal (± local Y, along the respective segment length) and anterior/posterior (± local X) manipulations within the solution space (gray regions, ±0.10 m).

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Sagittal plane hip (left) and knee (right) joint motion during swing phase for the TF amputee computer and physical models. Positive angles indicate flexion; negative angles indicate extension.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Locations of the optimized thigh only (white square), shank only (filled cross), and thigh/shank counter-masses (open circle) presented on the TF amputee physical model

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In