Research Papers

Experimental Characterization and Control of Miniaturized Pneumatic Artificial Muscle

[+] Author and Article Information
Shanthanu Chakravarthy

Department of Mechanical Engineering,
Indian Institute of Science,
Bangalore 560012, India
e-mail: sc@mecheng.iisc.ernet.in

K. Aditya

Department of Mechanical Engineering,
Indian Institute of Science,
Bangalore 560012, India
e-mail: adityak@mecheng.iisc.ernet.in

Ashitava Ghosal

Department of Mechanical Engineering,
Indian Institute of Science,
Bangalore 560012, India
e-mail: asitava@mecheng.iisc.ernet.in

The Arduino Mega 2560 board also has the advantage of the availability of several PWM channels and these could be useful while designing a surgical device with many actuators. The Arduino Mega 2560 board is also very easy to program.

Manuscript received November 7, 2013; final manuscript received August 13, 2014; published online October 13, 2014. Assoc. Editor: Venketesh Dubey.

J. Med. Devices 8(4), 041011 (Oct 13, 2014) (9 pages) Paper No: MED-13-1273; doi: 10.1115/1.4028420 History: Received November 07, 2013; Revised August 13, 2014

Robotic surgical tools used in minimally invasive surgeries (MIS) require miniaturized and reliable actuators for precise positioning and control of the end-effector. Miniature pneumatic artificial muscles (MPAMs) are a good choice due to their inert nature, high force to weight ratio, and fast actuation. In this paper, we present the development of miniaturized braided pneumatic muscles with an outer diameter of ∼1.2 mm, a high contraction ratio of about 18%, and capable of providing a pull force in excess of 4 N at a supply pressure of 0.8 MPa. We present the details of the developed experimental setup, experimental data on contraction and force as a function of applied pressure, and characterization of the MPAM. We also present a simple kinematics and experimental data based model of the braided pneumatic muscle and show that the model predicts contraction in length to within 20% of the measured value. Finally, a robust controller for the MPAMs is developed and validated with experiments and it is shown that the MPAMs have a time constant of ∼10 ms thereby making them suitable for actuating endoscopic and robotic surgical tools.

Copyright © 2014 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Della Flora, E., Wilson, T. G., Martin, I. J., O'Rourke, N. A., and Maddern, G., 2008, “Review of Natural Orifice Translumenal Endoscopic Surgery (NOTES) for Intra-Abdominal Surgery: Experimental Models, Techniques and Applicability to the Clinical Setting,” Ann. Surg., 247(4), pp. 583–602. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Chou, C.-P., and Hannaford, B., 1996, “Measurement and Modeling of McKibben Pneumatic Artificial Muscles,” IEEE Trans. Rob. Autom., 12(1), pp. 90–102. [CrossRef]
De Volder, M., Moers, A., and Reynaerts, D., 2011, “Fabrication and Control of Miniature McKibben Actuators,” Sens. Actuators A, 166(1), pp. 111–116. [CrossRef]
Tondu, B., and Lopez, P., 2000, “Modeling and Control of McKibben Artificial Muscle Robot Actuators,” IEEE Control Syst. Mag., 20(2), pp. 15–38. [CrossRef]
Trivedi, D., Rahn, C. D., Kier, W. M., and Walker, I. D., 2008, “Soft Robotics: Biological Inspiration, State of the Art, and Future Research,” Appl. Bionics Biomech., 5(3), pp. 99–117. [CrossRef]
Ikuta, K., Nokata, M., and Aritomi, S., 1994, “Biomedical Micro Robots Driven by Miniature Cybernetic Actuator,” IEEE Workshop on Micro Electro Mechanical Systems (MEMS '94), Oiso, Japan, Jan. 25–28, pp. 263–268. [CrossRef]
Kai, X., Goldman, R. E., Jienan, D., Allen, P. K., Fowler, D. L., and Simaan, N., 2009, “System Design of an Insertable Robotic Effector Platform for Single Port Access (SPA) Surgery,” IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems(IROS 2009), St. Louis, MO, Oct. 11–15, pp. 5546–5552. [CrossRef]
Szewczyk, J., De Sars, V., Bidaud, P., and Dumont, G., 2001, “An Active Tubular Polyarticulated Micro-System for Flexible Endoscope,” Experimental Robotics VII, Springer, Berlin, Germany.
Degani, A., Choset, H., Wolf, A., and Zenati, M. A., 2006, “Highly Articulated Robotic Probe for Minimally Invasive Surgery,” IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation(ICRA 2006), Orlando, FL, May 15–19, pp. 4167–4172. [CrossRef]
Slatkin, A. B., Burdick, J., and Grundfest, W., 1995, “The Development of a Robotic Endoscope,” IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS '95), Pittsburgh, PA, Aug. 5–9, pp. 162–171. [CrossRef]
Webster, R. J., and Jones, B. A., 2010, “Design and Kinematic Modeling of Constant Curvature Continuum Robots: A Review,” Int. J. Rob. Res., 29(13), pp. 1661–1683. [CrossRef]
Jianzhong, S., Payne, C. J., Clark, J., Noonan, D. P., Ka-Wai, K., Darzi, A., and Guang-Zhong, Y., 2012, “Design of a Multitasking Robotic Platform With Flexible Arms and Articulated Head for Minimally Invasive Surgery,” Intelligent IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Robots and Systems (IROS), Vilamoura, Portugal, Oct. 7–12, pp. 1988–1993. [CrossRef]
Kornbluh, R., Pelrine, R., Eckerle, J., and Joseph, J., 1998, “Electrostrictive Polymer Artificial Muscle Actuators,” IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Leuven, Belgium, May 16–20, pp. 2147–2154. [CrossRef]
Moers, A., De Volder, M., and Reynaerts, D., 2012, “Integrated High Pressure Microhydraulic Actuation and Control for Surgical Instruments,” Biomed. Microdevices, 14(4), pp. 699–708. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Tondu, B., 2012, “Modelling of the McKibben Artificial Muscle: A Review,” J. Intell. Mater. Syst. Struct., 23(3), pp. 225–253. [CrossRef]
Klute, G. K., and Hannaford, B., 1998, “Fatigue Characteristics of McKibben Artificial Muscle Actuators,” IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Victoria, BC, Canada, Oct. 13–17, pp. 1776–1781. [CrossRef]
Liu, W., and Rahn, C. R., 2003, “Fiber-Reinforced Membrane Models of McKibben Actuators,” ASME J. Appl. Mech., 70(6), pp. 853–859. [CrossRef]
Ramasamy, R., Juhari, M. R., Mamat, M., Yaacob, S., Nasir, N. M., and Sugisaka, M., 2005, “An Application of Finite Element Modelling to Pneumatic Artificial Muscle,” Am. J. Appl. Sci., 2(11), pp. 1504–1508. [CrossRef]
Zhou, B., Accorsi, M., and Leonard, J., 2004, “A New Finite Element for Modeling Pneumatic Muscle Actuators,” Comput. Struct., 82(11), pp. 845–856. [CrossRef]
De Volder, M., Coosemans, J., Puers, R., and Reynaerts, D., 2008, “Characterization and Control of a Pneumatic Microactuator With an Integrated Inductive Position Sensor,” Sens. Actuators A, 141(1), pp. 192–200. [CrossRef]
Woods, B. K., Choi, Y.-T., Kothera, C. S., and Wereley, N. M., 2013, “Control System Development for Pneumatic Artificial Muscle-Driven Active Rotor Systems,” J. Guid. Control Dyn., 36(4), pp. 1177–1185. [CrossRef]
Kothera, C. S., Jangid, M., Sirohi, J., and Wereley, N. M., 2009, “Experimental Characterization and Static Modeling of McKibben Actuators,” ASME J. Mech. Des., 131(9), p. 091010. [CrossRef]
Nagaraj, B., Pandiyan, R., and Ghosal, A., 2009, “Kinematics of Pantograph Masts,” Mech. Mach. Theory, 44(4), pp. 822–834. [CrossRef]
Abràmoff, M. D., Magalhães, P. J., and Ram, S. J., 2004, “Image Processing With ImageJ,” Biophotonics Int., 11(7), pp. 36–42, available at: http://webeye.ophth.uiowa.edu/dept/biograph/abramoff/imagej.pdf
Parker, 2013, VSO Miniature Proportional “Valve,” Parker Hannifin Precision Fluidics Division, Hollis, NH, accessed May 11, 2013, http://ph.parker.com/us/12051/en/vso-miniature-proportional-valve
Arduino, 2012 “An Open-Source Electronics Prototyping Platform,” accessed May 11, 2013, http://www.arduino.cc
MathWorks, 2012, matlab, Version 7.12.0 (R2012a), The MathWorks Inc., Natick, MA.
Khalil, H. K., 1992, Nonlinear Systems, Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

(a) Unpressurized (left) and pressurized (right) cross section of the silicone tube, (b) initial (left) and contracted length (right) of the braid, and (c) silicone tube and braid arranged to obtain pneumatic muscle

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

(a) Experimental setup for obtaining maximum force generated by the MPAM and (b) forces versus pressure for different lengths of the MPAMs

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Experimental setup used for characterizing the MPAMs

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Force versus contraction plots for lengths (a) 97 mm, (b) 117 mm, and (c) 143 mm

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Hysteresis in the fabricated MPAMs

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

(a) Geometric representation of the actuator and (b) pantograph representation of the braid

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Magnified view of the (a) central and (b) end section of the braid captured using digital microscope

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Length versus cosine of braid angle plot for (a) 97 mm, (b) 117 mm, and (c) 143 mm

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Cosine versus pressure for three MPAMs carrying an end load of 0.6 N (left) and 2.1 N (right)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Control architecture for controlling the developed MPAM

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Current driver circuit for the proportional valve

Grahic Jump Location
Fig 13

Controller response for gain (a) 120 and gain (b) 150

Grahic Jump Location
Fig 14

(a) CAD illustration of the prototype and (b) snapshots showing the rotational motion of the endoscopic surgical device




Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In