Research Papers

Kinematic Design of a Novel Spatial Remote Center-of-Motion Mechanism for Minimally Invasive Surgical Robot

[+] Author and Article Information
Jianmin Li

Key Lab for Mechanism Theory
and Equipment Design of Ministry of Education,
Tianjin University,
Tianjin 300072, China
e-mail: jimmyzhq@gmail.com

Yuan Xing

Key Lab for Mechanism Theory
and Equipment Design of Ministry of Education,
Tianjin University,
Tianjin 300072, China
e-mail: yuanxing1123@126.com

Ke Liang

Key Lab for Mechanism Theory
and Equipment Design of Ministry of Education,
Tianjin University,
Tianjin 300072, China
e-mail: lkchina1984@sina.com

Shuxin Wang

Key Lab for Mechanism Theory
and Equipment Design of Ministry of Education,
Tianjin University,
Tianjin 300072, China
e-mail: shuxinw@tju.edu.cn

Manuscript received March 20, 2014; final manuscript received September 16, 2014; published online November 14, 2014. Assoc. Editor: Rita M. Patterson.

J. Med. Devices 9(1), 011003 (Mar 01, 2015) (8 pages) Paper No: MED-14-1153; doi: 10.1115/1.4028651 History: Received March 20, 2014; Revised September 16, 2014; Online November 14, 2014

To deliver more value to the healthcare industry, a specialized surgical robot is needed in the minimally invasive surgery (MIS) field. To fill this need, a compact hybrid robotic wrist with four degrees of freedom (DOFs) is developed for assisting physicians to perform MIS. The main body of the wrist is a 2DOF parallel mechanism with a remote center-of-motion (RCM), which is located outside the mechanism. From the mechanical point of view, it is different from existing 2DOF spherical mechanisms, since there is no physical constraint on the RCM. Other DOFs of the wrist are realized by a revolute joint and a prismatic joint, which are serially mounted on the movable platform of the parallel mechanism. The function of these DOFs is to realize the roll motion and the in-out translation of the surgical tool. Special attention is paid to the parallel RCM mechanism. The detailed design is provided and the kinematic equations are obtained in the paper. Further, the Jacobian matrix is derived based on the kinematic equations. Finally, the paper examines the singularity configurations and implements the condition number analysis to identify the kinematic performance of the mechanism.

Copyright © 2015 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Dai, J. S., 2010, “Editorial: Surgical Robotics and Its Development and Progress,” Robotica, 28(2), p. 161. [CrossRef]
Guthart, G. S., and Salisbury, J. K., Jr., 2000, “The Intuitive™ Telesurgery System: Overview and Application,” IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA'00), San Francisco, CA, Apr. 24–28, pp. 618–621. [CrossRef]
Intuitive Surgical, 2014, “Investor Presentation Q1 2014,” Intuitive Surgical, Inc., Sunnyvale, CA, accessed May Intuitive Surgical, Inc., Sunnyvale, CA, accessed May 7, 2014, http://www.intuitivesurgical.com
Gomes, P., 2011, “Surgical Robotics: Reviewing the Past, Analyzing the Present, Imagining the Future,” Rob. Comput.-Integr. Manuf., 27(2), pp. 261–266. [CrossRef]
Kuo, C. H., Dai, J. S., and Dasgupta, P., 2012, “Kinematic Design Considerations for Minimally Invasive Surgical Robots: An Overview,” Int. J. Med Rob. Comput. Assisted Surg., 8(2), pp. 127–145. [CrossRef]
Nabil, Z., and Guillaume, M., 2007, “Mechatronic Design of a New Robot for Force Control in Minimally Invasive Surgery,” IEEE/ASME Trans. Mechatronics, 2(2), pp. 143–153. [CrossRef]
Zhang, X. L., and Nelson, C. A., 2008, “Kinematic Analysis and Optimization of a Novel Robot for Surgical Tool Manipulation,” ASME J. Med. Devices, 2(2), p. 021003. [CrossRef]
Stolzenburg, J. U., Kallidonis, P., Minh, D., Dietel, A., Häfner, T., Dimitriou, D., Al-Aown, A., Kyriazis, I., and Liatsikos, E. N., 2009, “Endoscopic Extraperitoneal Radical Prostatectomy: Evolution of the Technique and Experience With 2400 Cases,” J. Endourology, 23(9), pp. 1467–1472. [CrossRef]
Voros, S., Haber, G. P., Menudet, J. F., Long, J. A., and Cinquin, P., 2010, “ViKY Robotic Scope Holder: Initial Clinical Experience and Preliminary Results Using Instrument Tracking,” IEEE/ASME Trans. Mechatronics, 15(6), pp. 879–886. [CrossRef]
Taylor, R. H., Jensen, P., Whitcomb, L., Barnes, A., Kumar, R., Stoianovici, D., Gupta, P., Wang, Z.-X., deJuan, E., and Kavoussi, L., 1999, “A Steady-Hand Robotic System for Microsurgical Augmentation,” Second International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention (MICCAI'99), Cambridge, UK, Sept. 19–22, Vol. 1679, pp. 1031–1041. [CrossRef]
Kobayashi, Y., Chiyoda, S., Watabe, K., Masafumi, O., and Nakamura, Y., 2002, “Small Occupancy Robotic Mechanisms for Endoscopic Surgery,” 5th International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention (MICCAI 2002), Tokyo, Japan, Sept. 25–28, Vol. 2488, pp. 75–85. [CrossRef]
Autorino, R., Kaouk, J. H., Stolzenburg, J. U., Gill, I. S., Mottrie, A., Tewari, A., and Cadeddu, J. A., 2013, “Current Status and Future Directions of Robotic Single-Site Surgery: A Systematic Review,” Eur. Urol., 63(2), pp. 266–280. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Shaikh, S. N., and Thompson, C. C., 2010, “Natural Orifice Translumenal Surgery: Flexible Platform Review,” World J. Gastrointest. Surg., 2(6), pp. 210–216. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Antoniou, S. A., Pointner, R., and Granderath, F. A., 2011, “Single-Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Systematic Review,” Surg. Endoscopy, 25(2), pp. 367–377. [CrossRef]
Ahmed, K., Wang, T. T., Patel, V. M., Nagpal, K., Clark, J., Ali, M., Deeba, S., Ashrafian, H., Darzi, A., Athanasiou, T., and Paraskeva, P., 2011, “The Role of Single-Incision Laparoscopic Surgery in Abdominal and Pelvic Surgery: A Systematic Review,” Surg. Endoscopy, 25(2), pp. 378–396. [CrossRef]
Xu, K., Zhao, J. R., and Shih, A. J., 2012, “Development of an Endoscopic Continuum Robot to Enable Transgastric Surgical Obesity Treatment,” 5th International Conference (ICIRA 2012), Montreal, QC, Canada, Oct. 3–5, pp. 589–600. [CrossRef]
Puglisi, L. J., Saltaren, R. J., Portoles, G. R., Moreno, H., Cardenas, P., and Garcia, C., 2013, “Design and Kinematic Analysis of 3PSS-1S Wrist for Needle Insertion Guidance,” Rob. Auton. Syst., 61(5), pp. 417–427. [CrossRef]
Kuo, C. H., and Dai, J. S., 2012, “Kinematics of a Fully-Decoupled Remote Center-of-Motion Parallel Manipulator for Minimally Invasive Surgery,” ASME J. Med. Devices, 6(2), p. 021008. [CrossRef]
Shohan, M., Baena, M., Zehavi, E., Joskowicz, L., Batkilin, E., and Kunicher, Y., 2003, “Bone-Mounted Miniature Robot for Surgical Procedures: Concept and Clinical Applications,” IEEE Trans. Rob. Autom., 19(5), pp. 893–901. [CrossRef]
Merlet, J. P., 2002, “Optimal Design for the Micro Parallel Robot MIPS,” IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA '02), Washington, DC, May 11–15, pp. 1149–1154. [CrossRef]
Li, J. M., Zhang, G. K., Muller, A., and Wang, S. X., 2013, “A Family of Remote Center of Motion Mechanisms Based on Intersecting Motion Planes,” ASME J. Mech. Des., 135(9), p.091009. [CrossRef]
Zlatanov, D., Bonew, I. A., and Gosselin, C. M., 2002, “Constraint Singularities of Parallel Mechanisms,” IEEE Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA '02), Washington, DC, May 11–15, pp. 496–502. [CrossRef]
Lum, M. J. H., Rosen, J., Sinanan, M. N., and Hannaford, B., 2004, “Kinematic Optimization of a Spherical Mechanism for a Minimally Invasive Surgical Robot,” IEEE Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA '04), New Orleans, LA, Apr. 26–May 1, pp. 829–834. [CrossRef]


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

The kinematic model of the 2DOF parallel RCM mechanism

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

The kinematic structure of the robot wrist

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Two movable planes with the intersection line passing through a fixed point

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

The double parallelogram mechanism

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

DOF constraints of MIS at the incision point

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

The distribution of 1/κ(J) versus the title angles ψx and ψy when β = 30 deg

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

The variations of the area of workspace versus the dimensional parameter β. (a) β = 20 deg, (b) β = 30 deg, (c) β = 40 deg, (d) β = 45 deg, (e) β = 50 deg, and (f) β = 60 deg.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

The variations of γ versus the dimensional parameter β

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

A prototype of the proposed MIS robot: (a) the prototype of the proposed robotic wrist and (b) an installation scheme of the robot



Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In