0
Research Papers

Design of Bioimpedance Spectroscopy Instrument With Compensation Techniques for Soft Tissue Characterization

[+] Author and Article Information
Robert E. Dodde

Stryker Corporation,
4100 E. Milham Avenue,
Kalamazoo, MI 49001
e-mail: robert.dodde@stryker.com

Grant H. Kruger

Mechanical Engineering,
University of Michigan,
1031 H.H. Dow Building,
2350 Hayward Street,
Ann Arbor, MI 48109
e-mail: ghkruger@umich.edu

Albert J. Shih

Mechanical Engineering,
University of Michigan,
3001E EECS,
1301 Beal,
Ann Arbor, MI 48109
e-mail: shiha@umich.edu

1Corresponding author.

Manuscript received February 22, 2014; final manuscript received January 22, 2015; published online April 24, 2015. Assoc. Editor: Carl Nelson.

J. Med. Devices 9(2), 021001 (Jun 01, 2015) (8 pages) Paper No: MED-14-1133; doi: 10.1115/1.4029706 History: Received February 22, 2014; Revised January 22, 2015; Online April 24, 2015

Bioimpedance spectroscopy (BIS) has shown significant potential in many areas of medicine to provide new physiologic markers. Several acute and chronic diseases are accompanied by changes in intra- and extracellular fluid within various areas of the human body. The estimation of fluid in various body compartments is therefore a simple and convenient method to monitor certain disease states. In this work, the design and evaluation of a BIS instrument are presented and three key areas of the development process investigated facilitating the BIS measurement of tissue hydration state. First, the benefit of incorporating DC-stabilizing circuitry to the standard modified Howland current pump (MHCP) is investigated to minimize the effect of DC offsets limiting the dynamic range of the system. Second, the influence of the distance between the bioimpedance probe and a high impedance material is investigated using finite element analysis (FEA). Third, an analytic compensation technique is presented to minimize the influence of parasitic capacitance. Finally, the overall experimental setup is evaluated through ex vivo BIS measurements of porcine spleen tissue and compared to published results. The DC-stabilizing circuit demonstrated its ability to maintain DC offsets at less than 650 μV through 100 kHz while maintaining an output impedance of 1 MΩ from 100 Hz to 100 kHz. The proximity of a bioimpedance probe to a high impedance material such as acrylic was shown to increase measured impedance readings by a factor of 4x as the ratio of the distance between the sensing electrodes to the distance between the bioimpedance probe and acrylic reached 1:3. The average parasitic capacitance for the circuit presented was found to be 712 ± 128 pF, and the analytic compensation method was shown to be able to minimize this effect on the BIS measurements. Measurements of porcine spleen tissue showed close correlation with experimental results reported in published articles. This research presents the successful design and evaluation of a BIS instrument. Specifically, robust measurements were obtained by implementing a DC-stabilized current source, investigating probe-material proximity issues and compensating for parasitic capacitance. These strategies were shown to provide tissue measurements comparable with published literature.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2015 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Geddes, L. A., 1975, “The Decrease in Transthoracic Impedance During Successive Ventricular Defibrillation Trials,” Med. Instrum., 9(4), pp. 179–180. [PubMed]
Grimnes, S., and Martinsen, O. G., 2008, Bioimpedance and Bioelectricity Basics, Academic, London.
Bera, T. K., 2014, “Bioelectrical Impedance Methods for Noninvasive Health Monitoring: A Review,” J. Med. Eng., 2014, p. 381251. [CrossRef]
Jaffrin, M., and Morel, H., 2008, “Body Fluid Volumes Measurements by Impedance: A Review of Bioimpedance Spectroscopy (BIS) and Bioimpedance Analysis (BIA) Methods,” Med. Eng. Phys., 30(10), pp. 1257–1269. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Woodrow, G., Oldroyd, B., Smith, M., and Turney, J., 1996, “Measurement of Body Composition in Chronic Renal Failure: Comparison of Skinfold Anthropometry and Bioelectrical Impedance With Dual Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry,” Eur. J. Clin. Nutr., 50(5), pp. 295–301. [PubMed]
Baarends, E., Lichtenbelt, W. V. M., Wouters, E., and Schols, A., 1998, “Body-Water Compartments Measured by Bio-Electrical Impedance Spectroscopy in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease,” Clin. Nutr., 17(1), pp. 15–22. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Greenberg, B., Lazio, L., Coutier, D., and Hermann, D., 1999, “Thoracic Electrical Bioimpedance Measurement of Cardiac Performance is Highly Reproducible in Heart Failure Patients,” J. Card. Failure, 5(3), p. 66. [CrossRef]
Karki, B., Wi, H., McEwan, A., Kwon, H., Oh, T., Woo, E., and Seo, J., 2014, “Evaluation of a Multi-Electrode Bioimpedance Spectroscopy Tensor Probe to Detect the Anisotropic Conductivity Spectra of Biological Tissues,” Meas. Sci. Technol., 25(7), p. 075702. [CrossRef]
Chauveau, N., Hamzaoui, L., Rochaix, P., Rigaud, B., Voigt, J. J., and Morucci, J. P., 1999, “Ex Vivo Discrimination Between Normal and Pathological Tissues in Human Breast Surgical Biopsies Using Bioimpedance Spectroscopy,” Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci., 873(1), pp. 42–50. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Nescolarde, L., Yanguas, J., Lukaski, H., Alomar, X., Rosell-Ferrer, J., and Rodas, G., 2013, “Localized Bioimpedance to Assess Muscle Injury,” Physiol. Meas., 34(2), pp. 237–245. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Hernandez, D., Sinkov, V., Roberts, W., Allaf, M., Patriciu, A., Jarrett, T., Kavoussi, L., and Stoianovici, D., 2001, “Measurement of Bio-Impedance With a Smart Needle to Confirm Percutaneous Kidney Access,” J. Urol., 166(4), pp. 1520–1523. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Bayford, R., and Scharfetter, H., 2008, “13th International Conference on Electrical Bioimpedance and 8th Conference on Electrical Impedance Tomography (Graz, Austria, 29 August–2 September 2007),” Physiol. Meas., 29(6), p. E01. [CrossRef]
Zhu, F., 2008, “Extracellular Fluid Redistribution During Hemodialysis: Bioimpedance Measurement and Model,” Physiol. Meas., 29(6), pp. S491–S501. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Brown, B. H., 2001, “Medical Impedance Tomography and Process Impedance Tomography: A Brief Review,” Meas. Sci. Technol., 12(8), pp. 991–996. [CrossRef]
Foster, K. R., and Schwan, H. P., 1995, “Dielectric Properties of Tissues—A Review,” Handbook of Biological Effects of Electromagnetic Radiation, 2nd ed., C.Polk and E.Postow, eds., CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, pp. 26–102.
Cole, K. S., 1940, “Permeability and Impermeability of Cell Membranes for Ions,” Quant. Biol., 8, pp. 110–122. [CrossRef]
Gabriel, C., 1996, “The Dielectric Properties of Biological Tissues: I. Literature Survey,” Phys. Med. Biol., 41(11), pp. 2231–2249. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Littwitz, C., Ragheb, T., and Geddes, L., 1990, “Cell Constant of the Tetrapolar Conductivity Cell,” Med. Biol. Eng. Comput., 28(6), pp. 587–590. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Jakosky, J. J., 1961, Exploration Geophysics, Trija Publishing, Newport Beach, CA.
Polk, C., and Postow, E., 1996, Handbook of Biological Effects of Electromagnetic Fields, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
Schwan, H. P., 1968, “Electrode Polarization Impedance and Measurements in Biological Materials,” Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci., 148(1), pp. 191–209. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Geddes, L. A., 1987, “The Rectification Properties of an Electrode-Electrolyte Interface Operated at High Sinusoidal Current Density,” IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., 34(9), pp. 669–672. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Brags, R., Rosell, J., and Riu, P., 1994, “A Wide-Band AC-Coupled Current Source for Electrical Impedance Tomography,” Physiol. Meas., 15(Suppl. 2A), pp. A91–A99. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Pliquett, U., Schonfeldt, M., Barthel, A., Frense, D., and Nacke, T., 2010, “Offset-Free Bidirectional Current Source for Impedance Measurement,” J. Phys.: Conf. Ser., 224(1), p. 012126. [CrossRef]
Birkett, A., 2005, “Bipolar Current Source Maintains High Output Impedance at High Frequencies,” Electron. Des. News, 50(25), pp. 128–130. http://www.edn.com/design/analog/4324499/Bipolar-current-source-maintains-high-output-impedance-at-high-frequencies
Cook, R. D., Saulnier, G. J., Gisser, D. G., Goble, J. C., Newell, J. C., and Isaacson, D., 1994, “ACT3: A High-Speed, High-Precision Electrical Impedance Tomograph,” IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., 41(8), pp. 713–722. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Ar-Rawi, A., Moghavvemi, M., and Wan-Ibrahim, W., 2009, “Wide Band Frequency Fixed Current Source for BIT and BIA,” World Congress on Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering (IFMBE Proceedings, Vol. 25/2), R.Magjarevic, ed., Springer, Berlin, pp. 522–524.
Hong, H., Rahal, M., Demosthenous, A., and Bayford, R. H., 2009, “Comparison of a New Integrated Current Source With the Modified Howland Circuit for EIT Applications,” Physiol. Meas., 30(10), pp. 999–1007. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Rafiei-Naeini, M., and McCann, H., 2008, “Low-Noise Current Excitation Sub-System for Medical EIT,” Physiol. Meas., 29(6), pp. S173–S184. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Qureshi, T. R., Chatwin, C. R., Huber, N., Zarafshani, A., Tunstall, B., and Wang, W., 2010, “Comparison of Howland and General Impedance Converter (GIC) Circuit Based Current Sources for Bio-Impedance Measurements,” J. Phys.: Conf. Ser., 224(1), p. 012167. [CrossRef]
Ross, A. S., 2003, “Current Source Design for Electrical Impedance Tomography,” Physiol. Meas., 24(2), pp. 509–516. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Sanchez, B., Vandersteen, G., Bragos, R., and Schoukens, J., 2011, “Optimal Multisine Excitation Design for Broadband Electrical Impedance Spectroscopy,” Meas. Sci. Technol., 22(11), p. 115601. [CrossRef]
Seoane, F., Macas, R., Brags, R., and Lindecrantz, K., 2011, “Simple Voltage-Controlled Current Source for Wideband Electrical Bioimpedance Spectroscopy: Circuit Dependences and Limitations,” Meas. Sci. Technol., 22(11), p. 115801. [CrossRef]
Stitt, R. M., 1990, “Implementation and Applications of Current Sources and Current Receiver,” Burr-Brown Application Bulletin, Burr-Brown, Tuscon, AZ, Technical Report No. SBOA046.
Buendia, R., Seoane, F., and Gil-Pita, R., 2010, “Experimental Validation of a Method for Removing the Capacitive Leakage Artifact From Electrical Bioimpedance Spectroscopy Measurements,” Meas. Sci. Technol., 21(11), p. 115802. [CrossRef]
Ackmann, J. J., 1993, “Complex Bioelectric Impedance Measurement System for the Frequency Range From 5 Hz to 1 MHz,” Ann. Biomed. Eng., 21(2), pp. 135–146. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Analog Devices, 2011, “Development of a Spice Model to Simulate Bandwidth and Slew Rate of the AMP03 Differential Amplifier,” Analog Devices, Norwood, MA.
Bertemes-Filho, P., Brown, B. H., and Wilson, A. J., 2000, “A Comparison of Modified Howland Circuits as Current Generators With Current Mirror Type Circuits,” Physiol. Meas., 21(1), pp. 1–6. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Scharfetter, H., 1998, “A Model of Artefacts Produced by Stray Capacitance During Whole Body or Segmental Bioimpedance Spectroscopy,” Physiol. Meas., 19(2), pp. 247–261. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Bolton, M. P., Ward, L. C., Khan, A., Campbell, I., Nightingale, P., Dewit, O., and Elia, M., 1998, “Sources of Error in Bioimpedance Spectroscopy,” Physiol. Meas., 19(2), pp. 235–245. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
McEwan, A., Cusick, G., and Holder, D. S., 2007, “A Review of Errors in Multi-Frequency EIT Instrumentation,” Physiol. Meas., 28(7), pp. S197–S215. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
De Lorenzo, A., Andreoli, A., Matthie, J., and Withers, P., 1997, “Predicting Body Cell Mass With Bioimpedance by Using Theoretical Methods: A Technological Review,” J. Appl. Physiol., 82(5), pp. 1542–1558. [PubMed]
Buendia, R., Seoane, F., and Gil-Pita, R., 2010, “A Novel Approach for Removing the Hook Effect Artefact From Electrical Bioimpedance Spectroscopy Measurements,” J. Phys.: Conf. Ser., 224(1), p. 012126. [CrossRef]
Tsai, J., 2000, “Dependence of Apparent Resistance of Four-Electrode Probes on Insertion Depth,” IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., 47(1), pp. 41–48. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Kottam, A., and Pearce, J. A., 2004, “Electric Field Penetration Depth of Myocardial Surface Catheters and the Measurement of Myocardial Resistivity,” Biomed. Sci. Instrum., 40, pp. 155–160. [PubMed]
Steendijk, P., Baan, J., Mur, G., and van der Velde, E. T., 1993, “The Four-Electrode Resistivity Technique in Anisotropic Media: Theoretical Analysis and Application on Myocardial Tissue In Vivo,” IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., 40(11), pp. 1138–1148. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Ayllon, D., Seoane, F., and Gil-Pita, R., 2009, “Cole Equation and Parameter Estimation From Electrical Bioimpedance Spectroscopy Measurements—A Comparative Study,” Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC 2009), Minneapolis, MN, Sept. 3–6, pp. 3779–3782. [CrossRef]
Bohren, C. F., 2010, “What Did Kramers and Kronig Do and How Did They Do It?,” Eur. J. Phys., 31(3), pp. 573–577. [CrossRef]
Gorter, C. J., 1936, “On the Theory of Absorption and Dispersion in Paramagnetic and Dielectric Media,” Physica, 3(9), pp. 1009–1020. [CrossRef]
Kronig, R. D. L., 1926, “On the Theory of Dispersion of X-Rays,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. Rev. Sci. Instrum., 12(6), pp. 547–558. [CrossRef]
Analog Devices, 2009, “Op Amp Common-Mode Rejection Ratio (CMRR),” Analog Devices, Norwood, MA, Technical Report No. MT-042.
Dodde, R., Bull, J., and Shih, A., 2012, “Bioimpedance of Soft Tissue Under Compression,” Physiol. Meas., 33(6), pp. 1095–1109. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

BIS probe prototype showing (a) actual probe and electrodes and (b) illustration of probe measuring tissue sample

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Expected impedance magnitudes to be driven by the current source based on literature values for platinum electrode contact impedance and the measured bioimpedance of spleen tissue

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Circuit diagram with experimental setup for the measurement system. The function generator supplies the reference voltage for the current source whose output is measured by the current-to-voltage converter. The differential amplifier uses a front end (AD8065) with very high input impedance to sense the voltage difference between the inner two electrodes and DC couples the readings. The output from the differential amplifier and the current-to-voltage converter are sent to an oscilloscope for measurement.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Schematic of the FEA used to analyze potential distribution within a cylindrical column of saline. A normal current density is defined at the HC electrode and a ground condition was defined at the LC electrode (see Fig. 3). All other external boundaries were given an insulation boundary condition, and all internal boundaries were given a continuity boundary condition.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Theoretical, simulated, and measured output impedance for the DC-stabilized MHCP

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Comparison of DC offset voltage measured in MultiSim for a standard and DC stabilized VCCS as a function of load

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Measured RMS current output for low and high impedance loads for the DC-stabilized MHCP

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Susceptance plot showing a linear increase as frequency is increased. The slope of this line is used to compensate for the parasitic capacitance in the system.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Results from the numerical and experimental effect of probe proximity to the bottom of the experimental tissue chamber, h. (a) Top view of the potential distribution (shading) and current density (streamlines) for h = 11 mm at the probe surface (left) and for h = 1 mm at the probe surface (right). Potential drop between the middle two electrodes is seen to increase in the case on the right. (b) Plot of impedance normalized to the measured impedance at 11 mm (|Z|/|Z|*) versus h. For the finite element model, impedance was calculated by dividing the potential drop by 60 μA. For the experimental measurements, impedance was calculated by dividing the measured potential drop by the measured current. The plot shows a dramatic increase in measured impedance as the probe moves closer to the bottom of the acrylic tissue chamber.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Raw (Zraw), corrected (Zcor), and fitted data (Zfit) for an example bioimpedance measurement on porcine spleen tissue. The order of points from left to right in the figure each represents an individual measurement performed at frequencies of 0.1, 0.2, 0.5, 1.0, 2.0, 5.0, 10.0, 20.0, and 50.0 kHz, respectively.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Comparison of electrical conductivity (σ) and electrical permittivity (ε) experimental results for porcine spleen with the literature (note literature based on a range of animal spleen values at various temperatures). Errors bars are provided, but are not clearly legible due to the log axis scale. The measurement error for conductivity values were fairly consistent, ranging from about ±21% at 0.1 kHz down to ±18% at 100 kHz. Permittivity measurement errors below 20 kHz were ±36%, decreasing to about ±20% over the 1–20 kHz range, and again increasing to ±36% by 0.5 kHz, and ±49% by 0.2 kHz.

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In