Design Innovation Paper

Design of Lower Limb Prosthesis Transverse Plane Adaptor With Variable Stiffness

[+] Author and Article Information
Corey Pew

Department of Mechanical Engineering,
University of Washington,
Seattle, WA 98195
Department of Veterans Affairs Center of Excellence for
Limb Loss Prevention and Prosthetic Engineering,
1660 S. Columbian Way,
Seattle, WA 98108
e-mail: Corey.Pew@gmail.com

Glenn K. Klute

Department of Mechanical Engineering,
University of Washington,
Seattle, WA 98195
Department of Veterans Affairs Center of Excellence for
Limb Loss Prevention and Prosthetic Engineering,
1660 S. Columbian Way,
Seattle, WA 98108
e-mail: gklute@u.washington.edu

Manuscript received June 27, 2014; final manuscript received April 16, 2015; published online July 16, 2015. Assoc. Editor: Rita M. Patterson. This material is declared a work of the U.S. Government and is not subject to copyright protection in the United States. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.

J. Med. Devices 9(3), 035001 (Sep 01, 2015) (6 pages) Paper No: MED-14-1199; doi: 10.1115/1.4030505 History: Received June 27, 2014; Revised April 16, 2015; Online July 16, 2015

A lower limb prosthesis is able to restore mobility to patients who have lost a limb; however, no current replacement is as moveable and adaptable as the limb that was lost. Therefore, all amputees suffer from a reduction in function at some level. Movement in the transverse plane of a lower limb prosthesis is often negated in a traditional prosthesis, and those devices that do allow for transverse plane motion are set to a single, fixed stiffness, and incapable of adapting to the varying activities of the user. A prototype device has been created that allows for varying stiffness in the transverse plane of a lower limb prosthesis. The variable stiffness torsion adapter (VSTA) functions by way of a movable pivot lever arm that can actively modify the mechanical advantage between the outer housing and the internal spring. The motion of the pivot is perpendicular to the external torque allowing for low power adjustments of the stiffness. Bench tests were performed and demonstrate the ability of the VSTA to vary torsional stiffness between 0.12 and 0.91 N m/deg over a ±30 deg rotational range of motion. The device also includes a mode for fully locked operation. The VSTA may improve the mobility of lower limb amputees by allowing for activity-dependent transverse plane stiffness.

Copyright © 2015 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Ziegler-Graham, K., MacKenzie, E. J., Ephraim, P. L., Travison, T. G., and Brookmeyer, R., 2008, “Estimating the Prevalence of Limb Loss in the United States: 2005 to 2050,” Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil., 89(3), pp. 422–429. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Rietman, J. S., Postema, K., and Geertzen, J. H. B., 2002, “Gait Analysis in Prosthetics: Opinions, Ideas and Conclusions,” Prosthet. Orthot. Int., 26(1), pp. 50–57. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Hafner, B. J., Sanders, J. E., Czerniecki, J. M., and Fergason, J., 2002, “Transtibial Energy-Storage-and-Return Prosthetic Devices: A Review of Energy Concepts and a Proposed Nomenclature,” J. Rehabil. Res. Dev., 39(1), pp. 1–11. http://www.rehab.research.va.gov/jour/02/39/1/pdf/hafner.pdf [PubMed]
Lamoureux, L. W., and Radcliffe, C. W., 1977, “Functional Analysis of the UC-BL Shank Axial Rotation Device,” Prosthet. Orthot. Int., 1(2), pp. 114–118. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Levy, S. W., 1980, “Skin Problems of the Leg Amputee,” Prosthet. Orthot. Int., 4(1), pp. 37–44. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Dudek, N. L., Marks, M. B., and Marshall, S. C., 2006, “Skin Problems in an Amputee Clinic,” Am. J. Phys. Med. Rehabil., 85(5), pp. 424–429. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
van der Linden, M. L., Twiste, N., and Rithalia, S. V. S., 2002, “The Biomechanical Effects of the Inclusion of a Torque Absorber on Trans‐Femoral Amputee Gait, A Pilot Study,” Prosthet. Orthot. Int., 26(1), pp. 35–43. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Segal, A. D., Orendurff, M. S., Czerniecki, J. M., Shofer, J. B., and Klute, G. K., 2009, “Transtibial Amputee Joint Rotation Moments During Straight-Line Walking and a Common Turning Task With and Without a Torsion Adapter,” J. Rehabil. Res. Dev., 46(3), pp. 375–383. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Su, P.-F., Gard, S. A., Lipshutz, R. D., and Kuiken, T. A., 2010, “The Effects of Increased Prosthetic Ankle Motions on the Gait of Persons With Bilateral Transtibial Amputations,” Am. J. Phys. Med. Rehabil., 89(1), pp. 34–47. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Buckley, J. G., Jones, S. F., and Birch, K. M., 2002, “Oxygen Consumption During Ambulation: Comparison of Using a Prosthesis Fitted With and Without a Tele-Torsion Device,” Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil., 83(4), pp. 576–581. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Miller, W. C., Speechley, M., and Deathe, B., 2001, “The Prevalence and Risk Factors of Falling and Fear of Falling Among Lower Extremity Amputees,” Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil., 82(8), pp. 1031–1037. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Orendurff, M. S., Segal, A. D., Berge, J. S., Flick, K. C., Spanier, D., and Klute, G. K., 2006, “The Kinematics and Kinetics of Turning: Limb Asymmetries Associated With Walking a Circular Path,” Gait Posture, 23(1), pp. 106–111. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Glaister, B. C., Schoen, J. A., Orendurff, M. S., and Klute, G. K., 2007, “Mechanical Behavior of the Human Ankle in the Transverse Plane While Turning,” IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng., 15(4), pp. 552–559. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Flick, K., Orendurff, M., Berge, J., Segal, A., and Klute, G., 2005, “Comparison of Human Turning Gait With the Mechanical Performance of Lower Limb Prosthetic Transverse Rotation Adapters,” Prosthet. Orthot. Int., 29(1), pp. 73–81. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Hansen, A. H., Childress, D. S., Miff, S. C., Gard, S. A., and Mesplay, K. P., 2004, “The Human Ankle During Walking: Implications for Design of Biomimetic Ankle Prostheses,” J. Biomech., 37(10), pp. 1467–1474. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Jafari, A., Tsagarakis, N. G., and Caldwell, D. G., 2011, “AwAS-II: A New Actuator With Adjustable Stiffness Based on the Novel Principle of Adaptable Pivot Point and Variable Lever Ratio,” 2011 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), Shanghai, May 9–13, pp. 4638–4643. [CrossRef]
Glaister, B. C., Schoen, J. A., Orendurff, M. S., and Klute, G. K., 2009, “A Mechanical Model of the Human Ankle in the Transverse Plane During Straight Walking: Implications for Prosthetic Design,” ASME J. Biomech. Eng., 131(3), p. 034501. [CrossRef]
Lin-Chan, S. J., Nielsen, D. H., Yack, H. J., Hsu, M. J., and Shurr, D. G., 2003, “The Effects of Added Prosthetic Mass on Physiologic Responses and Stride Frequency During Multiple Speeds of Walking in Persons With Transtibial Amputation,” Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil., 84(12), pp. 1865–1871. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Winter, D. A., 1991, The Biomechanics and Motor Control of Human Gait: Normal, Elderly and Pathological, 2nd ed., University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada, pp. 11–12.
Juvinall, R. C., and Marshek, K. M., 2012, Fundamentals of Machine Component Design, 5th ed., Wiley, New York, p. 411.
Taylor, M. J. D., Dabnichki, P., and Strike, S. C., 2005, “A Three-Dimensional Biomechanical Comparison Between Turning Strategies During the Stance Phase of Walking,” Hum. Mov. Sci., 24(4), pp. 558–573. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Huxham, F., Gong, J., Baker, R., Morris, M., and Iansek, R., 2006, “Defining Spatial Parameters for Non-Linear Walking,” Gait Posture, 23(2), pp. 159–163. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Waters, R. L., and Mulroy, S., 1999, “The Energy Expenditure of Normal and Pathologic Gait,” Gait Posture, 9(3), pp. 207–231. [CrossRef] [PubMed]


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Basic VSTA concept. This shows the VSTA layout as an applied force activating a simple lever attached to a torsion spring. The lever is allowed to slide along the pivot (in the direction of the horizontal arrows), effectively changing the lever arm length and the force required to deflect the spring to a specified angle. In this representation, the spring is fixed, while in the actual VSTA the spring and pivot move, and the lever arm position is fixed, but allowed to pivot around the point of force application.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Representation of the VSTA installed in a standard prosthesis

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

VSTA. A—upper housing, B—lower housing, C—lever arm, D—carriage, E—spring carrier, F—electric motor, G—guide rail (2×), H—ACME lead screw, and I—main bearing.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

The VSTA in the (a) low and (b) high stiffness settings

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Geometric layout of VSTA. This top view shows how the geometric relations between the lever arm and the spring center offset change as the VSTA is deflected. In the depicted orientation, the spring offset is closer to the lever pivot than the device center. As the lever pivot sweeps along its diameter, the lever arm will effectively lengthen.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Model of VSTA behavior at various settings. These curves depict the modeled behavior of the VSTA at individual stiffness settings. The torque increases linearly as the VSTA is deflected between 0 and 30 deg.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Results from bench testing of VSTA on MTS. The physical VSTA can be seen to match well with the model predicted torque curves, with deviation at the highest torque setting due to internal deflection of the components.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Depiction of internal moment causing deflection of components at high stiffness settings. The long distance between the lever arm force application and the grounding of the torsion spring causes a moment that deflects the guide rails of the spring carrier. This results in a deviation of the VSTA from model predictions.



Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In