0
Research Papers

# Automatic Measurement of End-Diastolic Arterial Lumen Diameter in ARTSENS

[+] Author and Article Information
Ashish Kumar Sahani

Department of Electrical Engineering,
Chennai 600 036, India
e-mail: ee10d043@ee.iitm.ac.in

Jayaraj Joseph

Healthcare Technology Innovation Centre,
Chennai 600 036, India
e-mail: jayaraj@htic.iitm.ac.in

Thambiran Heart and Vascular Institute,
Chennai 600 040, India
e-mail: hemarrk@yahoo.co.uk

Mohanasankar Sivaprakasam

Department of Electrical Engineering,
Chennai 600 036, India;
Healthcare Technology Innovation Centre,
Chennai 600 036, India
e-mail: mohan@ee.iitm.ac.in

1Corresponding author.

Manuscript received October 13, 2014; final manuscript received May 29, 2015; published online August 6, 2015. Assoc. Editor: John LaDisa.

J. Med. Devices 9(4), 041002 (Aug 06, 2015) (11 pages) Paper No: MED-14-1251; doi: 10.1115/1.4030873 History: Received October 13, 2014

## Abstract

Over past few years, we are developing a system for facilitating large scale screening of patients for cardiovascular risk—arterial stiffness evaluation for noninvasive screening (ARTSENS). ARTSENS is an image-free device that uses a single element ultrasound transducer to obtain noninvasive measurements of arterial stiffness (AS) in a fully automated manner. AS is directly proportional to end-diastolic lumen diameter ($Dd$). Multilayered structure of the arterial walls and indistinct characteristics of intima-lumen interface (ILI) makes it quite difficult to accurately estimate $Dd$ in A-mode radio-frequency (RF) frames obtained from ARTSENS. In this paper, we propose a few methods based on fitting simple mathematical models to the echoes from arterial walls, followed by a novel method to fuse the information from curve fitting error and distension curve to arrive at an accurate measure of $Dd$. To bring down the curve fitting time and facilitate processing on low-end processors, a novel approach using the autocorrelation of echoes from opposite walls of the artery has been discussed. The methods were analyzed for their comparative accuracy against reference $Dd$ obtained from 85 human volunteers using Hitachi-Aloka eTRACKING system. $Dd$ from all reported methods show strong and statistically significant positive correlation with eTRACKING and mean error of less than 7% could be achieved. As expected, $Dd$ from all methods show significant positive correlation with age.

<>

## References

WHO Media Centre, 2013, “Cardiovascular Diseases (CVDs),” World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland, Fact Sheet No. 317.
Mendis, S. , Puska, P. , and Norrving, B. , 2011, Global Atlas on Cardiovascular Disease Prevention and Control, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Liao, D. , Arnett, D. K. , Tyroler, H. A. , Riley, W. A. , Chambless, L. E. , Szklo, M. , and Heiss, G. , 1999, “Arterial Stiffness and the Development of Hypertension: The ARIC Study,” Hypertension, 34(2), pp. 201–206. [PubMed]
Oliver, J. , and Webb, D. , 2003, “Noninvasive Assessment of Arterial Stiffness and Risk of Atherosclerotic Events,” Arterioscler., Thromb., Vasc. Biol., 23(4), pp. 554–566.
Laurent, S. , Cockcroft, J. , Van Bortel, L. , Boutouyrie, P. , Giannattasio, C. , Hayoz, D. , Pannier, B. , Vlachopoulos, C. , Wilkinson, I. , and Struijker-Boudier, H. , 2006, “Expert Consensus Document on Arterial Stiffness: Methodological Issues and Clinical Applications,” Eur. Heart J., 27(21), pp. 2588–2605. [PubMed]
MCI, 2014, “Search Colleges & Courses,” Medical Council of India, New Delhi, India,
Alwan, A. , Armstrong, T. , Cowan, M. , and Riley, L. , 2011, “Noncommunicable Diseases Country Profiles 2011,” WHO Global Report, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Joseph, J. , and Jayashankar, V. , 2010, “A Virtual Instrument for Automated Measurement of Arterial Compliance,” ASME J. Med. Devices, 4(4), p. 045004.
Sahani, A. K. , Shah, M. I. , Radhakrishnan, R. , Joseph, J. , and Sivaprakasam, M. , 2015, “An Imageless Ultrasound Device to Measure Local and Regional Arterial Stiffness,” IEEE Trans. Biomed. Circuits Syst. (in press).
Sahani, A. K. , Joseph, J. , and Sivaprakasam, M. , 2012, “Automated System for Imageless Evaluation of Arterial Compliance,” 34th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC), San Diego, CA, Aug. 28–Sept. 1, pp. 227–231.
Sahani, A. K. , Joseph, J. , and Mohanasankar, S. , 2014, “Evaluation of the Algorithm for Automatic Identification of the Common Carotid Artery in ARTSENS,” Physiol. Meas., 35(7), pp. 1299–1317. [PubMed]
Sahani, A. K. , Shah, M. , Joseph, J. , and Sivaprakasam, M. , 2014, “An Improved Method for Detection of Carotid Walls in ARTSENS,” 36th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC), Chicago, Aug. 26–30, pp. 1957–1960.
Sahani, A. K. , Shah, M. I. , Joseph, J. , and Sivaprakasam, M. , 2015, “Carotid and Jugular Classification in ARTSENS,” IEEE J. Biomed. Health Inf. (in press).
Mackenzie, I. S. , Wilkinson, I. B. , and Cockcroft, J. R. , 2002, “Assessment of Arterial Stiffness in Clinical Practice,” QJM, 95(2), pp. 67–74. [PubMed]
Pannier, B. M. , Avolio, A. P. , Hoeks, A. , Mancia, G. , and Takazawa, K. , 2002, “Methods and Devices for Measuring Arterial Compliance in Humans,” Am. J. Hypertens., 15(8), pp. 743–753. [PubMed]
Sahani, A. K. , Ravi, V. , and Sivaprakasam, M. , 2014, “Automatic Estimation of Carotid Arterial Pressure in ARTSENS,” 11th IEEE India Conference (INDICON 2014), Pune, India, Dec. 11–13.
Stadler, R. , Taylor, J. A. , and Lees, R. , 1997, “Comparison of B-Mode, M-Mode and Echo-Tracking Methods for Measurement of the Arterial Distension Waveform,” Ultrasound Med. Biol., 23(6), pp. 879–887. [PubMed]
Carerj, S. , Nipote, C. , and Zimbalatti, C. , 2008, “A New Tool for the Evaluation of Stiffness Vascular Parameters in Clinical Practice: eTracking,” Cardiology Department, University of Messina, Messina, Italy, available at:
Joseph, J. , 2010, “Automated Evaluation of Local and Regional Arterial Compliance,” Ph.D. thesis, Department of Electrical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai, India.
Hoeks, A. P. G. , Brands, P. J. , Willigers, J. M. , and Reneman, R. S. , 1999, “Non-Invasive Measurement of Mechanical Properties of Arteries in Health and Disease,” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., Part H, 213(3), pp. 195–202.
Shah, M. , Joseph, J. , and Sivaprakasam, M. , 2014, “Ultrasound Signal Quality Parameterization for Image-Free Evaluation of Arterial Stiffness,” 36th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC), Chicago, Aug. 26–30, pp. 2326–2329.
Wendelhag, I. , Gustavsson, T. , Suurkiila, M. , Berglundt, G. , and Wikstrand, J. , 1991, “Ultrasound Measurement of Wall Thickness in the Carotid Artery: Fundamental Principles and Description of a Computerized Analysing System,” Clin. Physiol. Funct. Imaging, 11(6), pp. 565–577.
Hoeks, A. P. G. , Brands, P. J. , Smeets, F. A. M. , and Reneman, R. S. , 1990, “Assessment of the Distensibility of Superficial Arteries,” Ultrasound Med. Biol., 16(2), pp. 121–128. [PubMed]
Demirli, R. , Member, S. , Saniie, J. , and Member, S. , 2001, “Model-Based Estimation of Ultrasonic Echoes Part I: Analysis and Algorithms,” IEEE Trans. Ultrason., Ferroelectr., Freq. Control, 48(3), pp. 787–802.
Fan, L. , Santago, P. , Riley, W. , Herrington, D. M. , An, L. I. F. , Antago, P. E. S. , Iley, W. A. R. D. R. , and Errington, D. A. M. H. , 2001, “An Adaptive Template-Matching Method and Its Application to the Boundary Detection of Brachial Artery Ultrasound Scans,” Ultrasound Med. Biol., 27(3), pp. 399–408. [PubMed]
Li, S. , McDicken, W. , and Hoskins, P. , 1993, “Blood Vessel Diameter Measurement by Ultrasound,” Physiol. Meas, 14(3), pp. 291–297. [PubMed]
Potter, K. , Reed, C. J. , Green, D. J. , Hankey, G. J. , and Arnolda, L. F. , 2008, “Ultrasound Settings Significantly Alter Arterial Lumen and Wall Thickness Measurements,” Cardiovasc. Ultrasound, 6(1), p. 6. [PubMed]
Hasegawa, H. , Kanai, H. , and Koiwa, Y. , 2004, “Detection of Lumen-Intima Interface of Posterior Wall for Measurement of Elasticity of the Human Carotid Artery,” IEEE Trans. Ultrason., Ferroelectr., Freq. Control, 51(1), pp. 93–108.
Delsanto, S. , Molinari, F. , Giustetto, P. , Liboni, W. , Badalamenti, S. , and Suri, J. S. , 2007, “Characterization of a Completely User-Independent Algorithm for Carotid Artery Segmentation in 2-D Ultrasound Images,” IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas., 56(4), pp. 1265–1274.
Ilea, D. E. , Duffy, C. , Kavanagh, L. , Stanton, A. , Whelan, P. F. , and Member, S. , 2013, “Fully Automated Segmentation and Tracking of the Intima Media Thickness in Ultrasound Video Sequences of the Common Carotid Artery,” IEEE Trans. Ultrason., Ferroelectr., Freq. Control, 60(1), pp. 158–177.
Stadler, R. W. , Karl, W. C. , and Lees, R. S. , 1996, “New Methods for Arterial Diameter Measurement From B-Mode Images,” Ultrasound Med. Biol., 22(1), pp. 25–34. [PubMed]
François, B. , Carmassi, S. , Salvetti, M. V. , Ghiadoni, L. , Huang, Y. , Taddei, S. , and Salvetti, A. , 2002, “Automatic Evaluation of Arterial Diameter Variation From Vascular Echographic Images,” Ultrasound Med. Biol., 27(12), pp. 1621–1629.
Gutierrez, M. A. , Pilon, P. E. , Lage, S. G. , Kopel, L. , Carvalho, R. T. , Furuie, S. S. , and Paulo, S. , 2002, “Automatic Measurement of Carotid Diameter and Wall Thickness in Ultrasound Images,” Comput. Cardiol., 29, pp. 359–362.
Potter, K. , Green, D. J. , Reed, C. J. , Woodman, R. J. , Watts, G. F. , McQuillan, B. M. , Burke, V. , Hankey, G. J. , and Arnolda, L. F. , 2007, “Carotid Intima-Medial Thickness Measured on Multiple Ultrasound Frames: Evaluation of a DICOM-Based Software System,” Cardiovasc. Ultrasound, 5(1), p. 29. [PubMed]
Newey, V. R. , and Nassiri, D. K. , 2002, “Online Artery Diamaeter Measurement in Ultrasound Images Using Artificial Neural Networks,” Ultrasound Med. Biol., 28(2), pp. 209–216. [PubMed]
Cinthio, M. , Jansson, T. , Ahlgren, A. R. , Lindström, K. , and Persson, H. W. , 2010, “A Method for Arterial Diameter Change Measurements Using Ultrasonic B-Mode Data,” Ultrasound Med. Biol., 36(9), pp. 1504–1512. [PubMed]
Molinari, F. , Krishnamurthi, G. , Acharya, U. R. , Sree, S. V. , Saba, L. , Nicolaides, A. , and Suri, J. S. , 2012, “Hypothesis Validation of Far-Wall Brightness in Carotid-Artery Ultrasound for Feature-Based IMT Measurement Using a Combination of Level-Set Segmentation and Registration,” IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas., 61(4), pp. 1054–1063.
Martin Bland, J. , and Altman, D. , 1986, “Statistical Methods for Assessing Agreement Between Two Methods of Clinical Measurement,” Lancet, 327(8476), pp. 307–310.
Eigenbrodt, M. L. , Bursac, Z. , Rose, K. M. , Couper, D. J. , Tracy, R. E. , Evans, G. W. , Brancati, F. L. , and Mehta, J. L. , 2006, “Common Carotid Arterial Interadventitial Distance (Diameter) as an Indicator of the Damaging Effects of Age and Atherosclerosis, a Cross-Sectional Study of the Atherosclerosis Risk in Community Cohort Limited Access Data (ARICLAD), 1987-89,” Cardiovasc. Ultrasound, 4(1), p. 1. [PubMed]

## Figures

Fig. 1

(a) The placement of the probe and the hardware block diagram. (b) A typical frame obtained from CCA by ARTSENS hardware. Approximate positions of PW and DW determined by automatic algorithms are marked. Regions of interests Pf and Df are chosen around them. (c) Shifts in the positions of echoes within Pf and Df are tracked over successive frames to obtain the cumulative distension waveform (D).

Fig. 2

(a) A typical frame obtained from ARTSENS. Automatically determined approximate positions of arterial walls ωp and ωd are indicated. Arterial well (ψ) is chosen around ωp and ωd using Eq. (6). (b) The enlarged image of the ψ and its squared envelope (€). The fading characteristics and speckle noise at ILI can be seen. Dl as perceived by an experienced operator is marked by cursors. The central line divides the envelope into left half (Ł) and right half (-R), which are further processed to locate ILI of each half. Ł is flipped such that its origin is at the central line (8a). The expanse of Ł˜ and -R˜, as explained in Eqs. (8c) and (8d), is marked with two-headed arrows. (c) A schematic diagram of the cross-sectional view of the artery illustrating its general layered structure. ILI has been marked on (b) with respect to this figure.

Fig. 3

TSF applied on two halves of envelope of arterial well Ł' and -R'. Lumen diameter is given by IŁ'+I-R'.

Fig. 4

The Gaussian curves GŁ' and G-R' are fitted to two halves of envelope of the arterial well—Ł' and -R', respectively. ILI is located on the basis of standard deviation of the GF and empirically derived multipliers TGl and TGr.

Fig. 5

The squared envelope of the autocorrelation (Д) of ψ is shown on the left. Dl is the distance between the highest peak and the rising point of S3. HA extracted from S3(13d) is shown on the right. The optimal twin segments (LA) and optimal Gaussian curve (GA) are shown.

Fig. 6

The cumulative distension waveform (D), the lumen diameter waveform (-D = D(L)), and the confidence waveform (C// = C/(L)), normalized between 0 and 1, for the TSF method. D is much smoother than -D but there is high positive correlation between them. In this case, the third point of -D has the highest confidence of measurement, and large error in -D at 12th point is quite apparent which has the lowest confidence of measurement. To obtain a better estimate of Dd, we shift whole waveform D based on the third point (marked by the dashed line) such that D(3) = -D(3).

Fig. 7

The screenshots of B-mode and M-mode images and the final results obtained for a volunteer using Aloka eTRACKING system are shown. The reference value of Dd is highlighted with dashed rectangle.

Fig. 8

(a) Mean percentage error in measurement of end-diastolic lumen diameter using GF employing different values of TGl and TGr is shown. The optimal values of multipliers were found to be TGl = 2.6 and TGr = 0.9 for which total percentage error is 6.2%. (b) Mean percentage error in measurement of end-diastolic lumen diameter using AGF employing different values of TA is shown. The optimal value of TA was found to be 2.1 for which total percentage error is 7.0%.

Fig. 9

The linear regression analysis for all four methods. Best line fit between Dd measured using the reference method and the reported methods are shown. The line (y = x) is plotted in each figure as an ideal reference (dotted). A summary of the analysis is given in Table 2.

Fig. 10

The Bland–Altman plots for diameters measured using eTRACKING and ARTSENS for all the four methods are shown. Mean of the reference and estimated diameters are plotted along horizontal axes and their difference are plotted along the vertical axes. The LA are indicated by dashed lines (- - -) and the mean bias is plotted by the continuous line (—).

## Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

### Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related Proceedings Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections