Technical Brief

A Comparison of the Defect Rate Between Original Equipment Manufacturer and Reprocessed Single-Use Bipolar and Ultrasound Diathermy Devices

[+] Author and Article Information
Terrence J. Loftus

Medical Director Surgical Services and Clinical Resources,
Division of Care Management,
Banner Health,
1441 N. 12th Street,
Phoenix, AZ 85006
e-mail: Terry.Loftus@BannerHealth.com

Manuscript received July 16, 2014; final manuscript received June 8, 2015; published online August 6, 2015. Assoc. Editor: Rosaire Mongrain.

J. Med. Devices 9(4), 044501 (Aug 06, 2015) (2 pages) Paper No: MED-14-1209; doi: 10.1115/1.4030858 History: Received July 16, 2014

Reprocessing has emerged as an attempt to control the cost of single-use bipolar and ultrasound diathermy devices despite limited data on defect rates. This study compares the defect rates, as reported by surgical teams, between original equipment manufacturer (OEM) single-use bipolar and ultrasound diathermy devices and reprocessed (RP) devices. Data were retrospectively collected on 3112 devices over a 7-month period for two types of bipolar and ultrasound diathermy devices. There is a significant difference (p < 0.001) in reported bipolar and ultrasound diathermy device defects between OEM and RP. OEM single-use bipolar and ultrasound diathermy devices were reported to be defective more frequently than RP devices based on reports from the surgical team.

Copyright © 2015 by ASME
Topics: Ultrasound , Surgery , Teams
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Committee on Gynecologic Practice, The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, 2012, “Committee Opinion No. 537: Reprocessed Single-Use Devices,” Obstet. Gynecol., 120(4), pp. 974–976. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
U.S. GAO, 2008, “Reprocessed Single-Use Medical Devices: FDA Oversight Has Increased, and Available Information Does Not Indicate That Use Presents an Elevated Health Risk,” U.S. Government Accountability Office, Washington, DC, accessed May 1, 2014, http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d08147.pdf
Blackmore, C. C. , Bishop, R. , Luker, S. , and Williams, B. L. , 2013, “Applying Lean Methods to Improve Quality and Safety in Surgical Sterile Instrument Processing,” Jt. Comm. J. Qual. Patient Saf., 39(3), pp. 99–105. [PubMed]
Larose, E. , 2013, “Legal Implications of Single-Use Medical Device Reprocessing,” Healthcare Q., 16(3), pp. 48–52. [CrossRef]
Pyrek, K. M. , 2003, “Reprocessing of Medical Devices: Government Intensifies Its Scrutiny as Clinicians Debate Patient-Safety Issues. SurgiStrategies,” Last accessed May 16, 2014, http://www.surgistrategies.com/articles/2003/02/reprocessing-of-medical-devices-116124.aspx
Weld, K. J. , Dryer, S. , Hruby, G. , Ames, C. J. , Venkatesh, R. , Matthews, B. D. , and Landman, J. , 2006, “Comparison of Mechanical and In Vivo Performance of New and Reprocessed Harmonic Scalpels,” Urology, 67(5), pp. 898–903. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
FDA, Quality System Regulation, 2014, “Title 21 Part 820 of the Code of Federal Regulations,” U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Washington, DC, accessed May 15, 2014, http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfCFR/CFRSearch.cfm
Veselov, V. , Roytman, H. , and Alquier, L. , 2012, “Medical Device Regulations for Process Validation: Review of FDA, GHTF, and GAMP Requirements,” J. Validation Technol., 18(2), pp. 82–91.
Federal Register, Unique Device Identification System, 2013, “A Rule by the Food and Drug Administration on 09/24/2013,” U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Washington, DC, accessed May 15, 2014, https://www.federalregister.gov/articles/2013/09/24/2013-23059/unique-device-identification-system
Lee, J. , 2013, “Repositioning Reprocessing: Hospitals See Big Potential for Savings, But Safety Remains an Issue for Some,” Modern Healthcare, accessed June 4, 2014, http://www.modernhealthcare.com/article/20130706/MAGAZINE/307069957




Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In