Technical Brief

A Comparison of the Defect Rate Between Original Equipment Manufacturer and Reprocessed Single-Use Bipolar and Ultrasound Diathermy Devices

[+] Author and Article Information
Terrence J. Loftus

Medical Director Surgical Services and Clinical Resources,
Division of Care Management,
Banner Health,
1441 N. 12th Street,
Phoenix, AZ 85006
e-mail: Terry.Loftus@BannerHealth.com

Manuscript received July 16, 2014; final manuscript received June 8, 2015; published online August 6, 2015. Assoc. Editor: Rosaire Mongrain.

J. Med. Devices 9(4), 044501 (Aug 06, 2015) (2 pages) Paper No: MED-14-1209; doi: 10.1115/1.4030858 History: Received July 16, 2014

Reprocessing has emerged as an attempt to control the cost of single-use bipolar and ultrasound diathermy devices despite limited data on defect rates. This study compares the defect rates, as reported by surgical teams, between original equipment manufacturer (OEM) single-use bipolar and ultrasound diathermy devices and reprocessed (RP) devices. Data were retrospectively collected on 3112 devices over a 7-month period for two types of bipolar and ultrasound diathermy devices. There is a significant difference (p < 0.001) in reported bipolar and ultrasound diathermy device defects between OEM and RP. OEM single-use bipolar and ultrasound diathermy devices were reported to be defective more frequently than RP devices based on reports from the surgical team.

Copyright © 2015 by ASME
Topics: Ultrasound , Surgery , Teams
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.






Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In