0
Research Papers

A Computational Approximation to Model Variation in Cancellous Bone Screw Pull-Out

[+] Author and Article Information
A. Piper, C. J. Brown

College of Engineering,
Design and Physical Sciences,
Brunel University London,
Uxbridge UB8 3PH, UK

1Corresponding author.

Manuscript received July 13, 2015; final manuscript received February 15, 2016; published online May 12, 2016. Assoc. Editor: Rita M. Patterson.

J. Med. Devices 10(2), 021001 (May 12, 2016) (7 pages) Paper No: MED-15-1219; doi: 10.1115/1.4032868 History: Received July 13, 2015; Revised February 15, 2016

Cancellous bone screws are used to achieve good pull-out characteristics when connected to cancellous bone. This study examines some screw characteristics, including pitch and inner diameter, using a model of cancellous bone with a range of bone apparent densities (ADs). This was achieved using bone geometry based on microCT-scanned cancellous bone and converted into a geometric model using mimics® software. The finite element (FE) models were produced in ansys®. The calculated reaction force for pull-out of 0.2 mm shows the influence of design parameters. Change in the proximal half angle increased the stiffness by about 15% in line with the experimental findings of others. An increase in pull-out reaction force with an increase in bone AD was also observed. However, when a particular screw geometry in lower AD bone was modeled and then rotated through 180 deg on plan, a significant reduction in reaction force was noted. Further models with screws of similar geometry in the same location showed similar reductions in reaction force and hence pull-out stiffness. Examination of the geometry of the bone/screw interface indicates that in certain positions there is little cancellous bone to support the implant—leading to low pull-out reaction forces, which is very difficult to predict. The study also examined the effect of increasing the bone stiffness adjacent to the implant, and concluded that, even in bone of low AD, increases in pull-out stiffness might be achieved.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2016 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Asnis, S. E. , and Kyle, R. F. , 1996, Cannulated Screw Fixation: Principles and Operative Techniques, Springer Verlag, Berlin.
Chapman, J. , Harrington, R. , Lee, K. , Anderson, P. , Tencer, A. , and Kowalski, D. , 1996, “ Factors Affecting the Pullout Strength of Cancellous Bone Screws,” ASME J. Biomech. Eng., 118(3), pp. 391–398. [CrossRef]
Brown, C. , Sinclair, R. , Day, A. , Hess, B. , and Procter, P. , 2013, “ An Approximate Model for Cancellous Bone Screw Fixation,” Comput. Methods Biomech. Biomed. Eng., 16(4), pp. 443–450. [CrossRef]
Ruffoni, D. , Muller, R. , and van Lenthe, G. H. , 2012, “ Mechanisms of Reduced Implant Stability in Osteoporotic Bone,” Biomech. Model. Mechanobiol., 11(3–4), pp. 313–323. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Wirth, A. J. , Goldhahn, J. , Flaig, C. , Arbenz, P. , Müller, R. , and van Lenthe, G. H. , 2011, “ Implant Stability is Affected by Local Bone Microstructural Quality,” Bone, 49(3), pp. 473–478. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Stoesz, M. J. , Jastifer, J. R. , Chess, J. L. , Patel, B. , and Gustafson, P. A. , 2012, “ Surgeon Perception of Cancellous Screw Fixation,” ASME Paper No. SBC2012-80808.
WHO, 2003, “ Prevention and Management of Osteoporosis: Report of a WHO Scientific Group,” World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland, WHO Technical Report No. 921.
Gausepohl, T. , Möhring, R. , Pennig, D. , and Koebke, J. , 2001, “ Fine Thread Versus Coarse Thread: A Comparison of the Maximum Holding Power,” Injury, 32(S4), pp. 1–7. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Fensky, F. , Nüchtern, J. , Kolb, J. , Huber, S. , Rupprecht, M. , Jauch, S. , Sellenschloh, K. , Püschel, K. , Morlock, M. , and Rueger, J. , 2013, “ Cement Augmentation of the Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation for the Treatment of Osteoporotic Pertrochanteric Fractures—A Biomechanical Cadaver Study,” Injury, 44(6), pp. 802–807. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Larsson, S. , 2006, “ Cement Augmentation in Fracture Treatment,” Scand. J. Surg., 95(2), pp. 111–118. [PubMed]
Eriksson, F. , Mattsson, P. , and Larsson, S. , 2002, “ The Effect of Augmentation With Resorbable or Conventional Bone Cement on the Holding Strength for Femoral Neck Fracture Devices,” J. Orthop. Trauma, 16(5), pp. 302–310. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Day, J. S. , Ding, M. , Bednarz, P. , Van Der Linden, J. C. , Mashiba, T. , Hirano, T. , Johnston, C. C. , Burr, D. B. , Hvid, I. , Sumner, D. R. , and Weinans, H. , 2004, “ Bisphosphonate Treatment Affects Trabecular Bone Apparent Modulus Through Micro-Architecture Rather Than Matrix Properties,” J. Orthop. Res., 22(3), pp. 465–471. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Aspenberg, P. , Genant, H. K. , Johansson, T. , Nino, A. J. , See, K. , Krohn, K. , García Hernández, P. A. , Recknor, C. P. , Einhorn, T. A. , and Dalsky, G. P. , 2010, “ Teriparatide for Acceleration of Fracture Repair in Humans: A Prospective, Randomized, Double Blind Study of 102 Postmenopausal Women With Distal Radial Fractures,” J. Bone Miner. Res., 25(2), pp. 404–414. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Garrison, K. R. , Shemilt, I. , Donell, S. , Ryder, J. J. , Mugford, M. , Harvey, I. , Song, F. , and Alt, V. , 2010, “ Bone Morphogenetic Protein (BMP) for Fracture Healing in Adults,” Cochrane Database Syst. Rev., 6(6), p. CD006950. [PubMed]
Procter, P. , Bennani, P. , Brown, C. , Arnoldi, J. , Pioletti, D. , and Larsson, S. , 2015, “ Variability of the Pullout Strength of Cancellous Bone Screws With Cement Augmentation,” Clin. Biomech., 30(5), pp. 500–506. [CrossRef]
Hughes, C. M. , 2014, “ A Finite Element Modelling Strategy for Suture Anchor Devices,” Ph.D. thesis, Brunel University, Uxbridge, UK.
Bennani-Kamane, P. , 2012, “ Finite Element Modelling of Screw Fixation in Augmented and Non-Augmented Cancellous Bone,” Ph.D. thesis, Brunel University, Uxbridge, UK.
McDonnell, P. , Harrison, N. , Lohfeld, S. , Kennedy, O. , Zhang, Y. , and McHugh, P. E. , 2010, “ Investigation of the Mechanical Interaction of the Trabecular Core With an External Shell Using Rapid Prototype and Finite Element Models,” J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater., 3(1), pp. 63–76. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Scherf, H. , and Tilgner, R. , 2009, “ A New High-Resolution Computed Tomography (CT) Segmentation Method for Trabecular Bone Architectural Analysis,” Am. J. Phys. Anthropol., 140(1), pp. 39–51. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Coleman, M. N. , and Colbert, M. W. , 2007, “ CT Thresholding Protocols for Taking Measurements on Three-Dimensional Models,” Am. J. Phys. Anthropol., 133(1), pp. 723–725. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Kim, C. H. , Zhang, H. , Mikhail, G. , Von Stechow, D. , Müller, R. , Kim, H. S. , and Guo, X. E. , 2007, “ Effects of Thresholding Techniques on μCT-Based Finite Element Models of Trabecular Bone,” ASME J. Biomech. Eng., 129(4), pp. 481–486.
Hughes, C. M. , Bordush, A. , Robioneck, B. , Procter, P. , and Brown, C. J. , 2014, “ Bone Anchors—A Preliminary Finite Element Study of Some Factors Affecting Pullout,” ASME J. Med. Devices, 8(4), p. 041006. [CrossRef]
Bayraktar, H. H. , Morgan, E. F. , Niebur, G. L. , Morris, G. E. , Wong, E. K. , and Keaveny, T. M. , 2004, “ Comparison of the Elastic and Yield Properties of Human Femoral Trabecular and Cortical Bone Tissue,” J. Biomech., 37(1), pp. 27–35. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Rincon Kohli, L. , 2003, “ Identification of a Multiaxial Failure Criterion for Human Trabecular Bone,” Ph.D. thesis, Ecole Polytechnique Federale de Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Wang, Y. , Mori, R. , Ozoe, N. , Nakai, T. , and Uchio, Y. , 2009, “ Proximal Half Angle of the Screw Thread is a Critical Design Variable Affecting the Pull-Out Strength of Cancellous Bone Screws,” Clin. Biomech., 24(9), pp. 781–785. [CrossRef]
Keaveny, T. M. , Morgan, E. F. , Niebur, G. L. , and Yeh, O. C. , 2001, “ Biomechanics of Trabecular Bone,” Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng., 3(1), pp. 307–333. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Gibson, L. J. , and Ashby, M. F. , 1999, Cellular Solids: Structure and Properties, Cambridge University, Cambridge, UK.

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Cross-sectional view of the cancellous bone model with modeled screw and contact interface

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

BV fraction models

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Split volume bone model with screw showing contact

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Four examples of the varying pitch and inner diameter, pictured as the four extremes: (a) Pitch:2 mm, ID:1.2 mm; (b) Pitch:1.55 mm, ID:1.2 mm; (c) Pitch:2 mm, ID:2.6 mm; (d) Pitch: 1.55 mm, ID:2.6 mm

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Screw pull-out comparison of different BV fractions at two different screw pitches

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Pull-out reaction force at 0.2 mm displacement for all 12 models and three additional points

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Pull-out reaction force at 0.2 mm displacement for all 12 models

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In