0
Special Section Technical Briefs

Effects of Ready-to-Wear Sizing Conventions on Sensor Placement for Medical Wearable Sensing1

[+] Author and Article Information
Linsey A. Griffin, Lucy E. Dunne

Department of Design, Housing, and Apparel,
University of Minnesota,
Minneapolis, MN 55455

DOI: 10.1115/1.4033170Manuscript received March 1, 2016; final manuscript received March 17, 2016; published online May 12, 2016. Editor: William Durfee.

J. Med. Devices 10(2), 020939 (May 12, 2016) (2 pages) Paper No: MED-16-1144; doi: 10.1115/1.4033170 History: Received March 01, 2016; Revised March 17, 2016

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview
FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
Copyright © 2016 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Men’s front measurement comparison: ansur data with original and recentered ASTM size ranges

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Men’s front horizontal and vertical body spread compared to ASTM spread grade

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Visualization of the effect of anthropometric variability in length of the ansur population on placement of an ECG electrode in the “36” size garment across population quartiles (dashed line indicates level of electrode on shirt in the standard size, dot above or below the line indicates the expected anatomical location of electrode)

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In