0
Research Papers

Disposable Fluidic Actuators for Miniature In-Vivo Surgical Robotics

[+] Author and Article Information
Abolfazl Pourghodrat

Department of Mechanical and Materials
Engineering,
University of Nebraska-Lincoln,
W342 Nebraska Hall,
Lincoln, NE 68588-0526
e-mail: a.pourghodrat@gmail.com

Carl A. Nelson

Mem. ASME
Department of Mechanical
and Materials Engineering,
University of Nebraska-Lincoln,
W342 Nebraska Hall,
Lincoln, NE 68588-0526
e-mail: cnelson5@unl.edu

1Corresponding author.

Manuscript received January 4, 2016; final manuscript received September 27, 2016; published online December 21, 2016. Assoc. Editor: Venketesh Dubey.

J. Med. Devices 11(1), 011003 (Dec 21, 2016) (8 pages) Paper No: MED-16-1003; doi: 10.1115/1.4035005 History: Received January 04, 2016; Revised September 27, 2016

Fusion of robotics and minimally invasive surgery (MIS) has created new opportunities to develop diagnostic and therapeutic tools. Surgical robotics is advancing from externally actuated systems to miniature in-vivo robotics. However, with miniaturization of electric-motor-driven surgical robots, there comes a trade-off between the size of the robot and its capability. Slow actuation, low load capacity, sterilization difficulties, leaking electricity and transferring produced heat to tissues, and high cost are among the key limitations of the use of electric motors in in-vivo applications. Fluid power in the form of hydraulics or pneumatics has a long history in driving many industrial devices and could be exploited to circumvent these limitations. High power density and good compatibility with the in-vivo environment are the key advantages of fluid power over electric motors when it comes to in-vivo applications. However, fabrication of hydraulic/pneumatic actuators within the desired size and pressure range required for in-vivo surgical robotic applications poses new challenges. Sealing these types of miniature actuators at operating pressures requires obtaining very fine surface finishes which is difficult and costly. The research described here presents design, fabrication, and testing of a hydraulic/pneumatic double-acting cylinder, a limited-motion vane motor, and a balloon-actuated laparoscopic grasper. These actuators are small, seal-less, easy to fabricate, disposable, and inexpensive, thus ideal for single-use in-vivo applications. To demonstrate the ability of these actuators to drive robotic joints, they were modified and integrated in a robotic arm. The design and testing of this surgical robotic arm are presented to validate the concept of fluid-power actuators for in-vivo applications.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2017 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Intuitive Surgical, 2014, “ The da Vinci Surgical System,” Intuitive Surgical, Inc., Sunnyvale, CA, accessed June 3, 2014, www.intuitivesurgical.com/products/davinci_surgical_system/
Wortman, T. D. , Strabala, K. W. , Lehman, A. C. , Farritor, S. M. , and Oleynikov, D. , 2011, “ Laparoendoscopic Single-Site Surgery Using a Multi-Functional Miniature In Vivo Robot,” Int. J. Med. Robot. Comput. Assisted Surg., 7(1), pp. 17–21. [CrossRef]
Wortman, T. D. , Meyer, A. , Dolghi, O. , Lehman, A. C. , McCormick, R. L. , Farritor, S. M. , and Oleynikov, D. , 2012, “ Miniature Surgical Robot for Laparoendoscopic Single-Incision Colectomy,” Surg. Endoscopy, 26(3), pp. 727–731. [CrossRef]
McCormick, R. , Wortman, T. , Strabala, K. W. , Frederick, T. P. , Oleynikov, D. , and Farritor, S. M. , 2011, “ Kinematic and Workspace Comparison of Four and Five Degree of Freedom Miniature In Vivo Surgical Robot,” ASME J. Med. Devices, 5(2), p. 027533. [CrossRef]
Lehman, A. C. , Dumpert, J. , Wood, N. A. , Redden, L. , Visty, A. Q. , Farritor, S. , Varnell, B. , and Oleynikov, D. , 2009, “ Natural Orifice Cholecystectomy Using a Miniature Robot,” Surg. Endoscopy., 23(2), pp. 260–266. [CrossRef]
Rentschler, M. , Dumpert, J. , Platt, S. R. , Iagnemma, K. , Oleynikov, D. , and Farritor, S. M. , 2007, “ An In Vivo Mobile Robot for Surgical Vision and Task Assistance,” ASME J. Med. Devices, 1(1), pp. 23–29. [CrossRef]
Hawks, J. , 2010, “ Improved Mobile Wireless In Vivo Surgical Robots: Modular Design, Experimental Results, and Analysis,” Ph.D. thesis, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/mechengdiss/17/
Di Natali, C. , Ranzani, T. , Simi, M. , Menciassi, A. , and Valdastri, P. , 2012, “ Trans-Abdominal Active Magnetic Linkage for Robotic Surgery: Concept Definition and Model Assessment,” IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), Saint Paul, MN, May 14–18, pp. 695–700.
Seow, C. M. , Chin, W. J. , Nelson, C. A. , Nakamura, A. , Farritor, S. M. , and Oleynikov, D. , 2013, “ Articulated Manipulator With Multiple Instruments for Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery,” ASME J. Med. Devices, 7(4), p. 041004. [CrossRef]
Shen, T. , Nelson, C. A. , Warburton, K. , and Oleynikov, D. , 2015, “ Design and Analysis of a Novel Articulated Drive Mechanism for Multifunctional NOTES Robot,” ASME J. Mech. Rob., 7(1), p. 011004. [CrossRef]
Harada, K. , Oetomo, D. , Susiloa, E. , Menciassi, A. , Daney, D. , Merlet, J. P. , and Dario, P. , 2010, “ A Reconfigurable Modular Robotic Endoluminal Surgical System: Visions and Preliminary Results,” Robotica, 28(2), pp. 171–183. [CrossRef]
Nagy, Z. , Oung, R. , Abbott, J. J. , and Nelson, B. J. , 2008, “ Experimental Investigation of Magnetic Self-Assembly for Swallowable Modular Robots,” IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Nice, France, Sept. 22–26, pp. 1915–1920.
Patronik, N. , Zenati, M. A. , and Riviere, C. N. , 2004, “ Crawling on the Heart: A Mobile Robotic Device for Minimally Invasive Cardiac Interventions,” 7th International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention, Saint-Malo, France, Sept. 26–29, Vol. 3217, pp. 9–16.
Patronik, N. , Zenati, M. A. , and Riviere, C. N. , 2005, “ Preliminary Evaluation of a Mobile Robotic Device for Navigation and Intervention on the Beating Heart,” Comput. Aided Surg., 10(4), pp. 225–232. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Berg, D. R. , 2013, “ Design of a Hydraulic Dexterous Manipulator for Minimally Invasive Surgery,” Ph.D. dissertation, University of Minnesota Twin Cities, Minneapolis, MN. http://s3.amazonaws.com/drb_website_storage/devinberg.com/DevinBerg_dissertation2013s.pdf
Berg, D. R. , Li, P. Y. , and Erdman, A. G. , 2012, “ Achieving Dexterous Manipulation for Minimally Invasive Surgical Robots Through the Use of Hydraulics,” ASME Paper No. DSCC2012-MOVIC2012-8685.
Lehman, A. C. , 2012, “ Miniature In Vivo Robots for Minimally Invasive Surgery,” Ph.D. thesis, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE. http://gradworks.umi.com/35/21/3521519.html
Hollerbach, J. M. , Hunter, I. W. , and Ballantyne, J. , 1992, “ A Comparative Analysis of Actuator Technologies for Robotics,” The Robotics Review, Vol. 2, MIT Press Cambridge, MA, pp. 299–342.
Granosik, G. , and Borenstein, J. , 2006, “ Pneumatic Actuators for Serpentine Robot,” Climbing and Walking Robots, Springer, Berlin, pp. 719–726.
De Volder, M. , and Reynaerts, D. , 2010, “ Pneumatic and Hydraulic Microactuators: A Review,” J. Micromech. Microeng., 20(4), p. 043001. [CrossRef]
Pourghodrat, A. , Dehghani, H. , Nelson, C. A. , Oleynikov, D. , Dasgupta, P. , and Terry, B. S. , 2014, “ Disposable Fluidic Self-Propelling Robot for Colonoscopy,” ASME J. Med. Devices, 8(3), p. 039301.
Kim, B. , Lim, H. Y. , Park, J. H. , and Park, J. O. , 2006, “ Inchworm-Like Colonoscopic Robot With Hollow Body and Steering Device,” JSME Int. J. Ser. C, 49(1), pp. 205–212. [CrossRef]
Shike, M. , Fireman, Z. , Eliakim, R. , Segol, O. , Sloyer, A. , Cohen, L. B. , Goldfarb-Albak, S. , and Repici, A. , 2008, “ Sightline ColonoSight System for a Disposable, Power-Assisted, Non-Fiber-Optic Colonoscopy (With Video),” Gastrointest. Endoscopy, 68(4), pp. 701–711. [CrossRef]
De Visser, H. , Heijnsdijk, E. A. , Herder, J. L. , and Pistecky, P. V. , 2002, “ Forces and Displacements in Colon Surgery,” Surg. Endoscopy, 16(10), pp. 1426–1430. [CrossRef]
Pourghodrat, A. , and Nelson, C. A. , 2013, “ Miniature Fluidic Actuators for Surgical Robotics,” ASME J. Med. Devices, 8(3), p. 030920. [CrossRef]
Faulhaber, 2015, “ DC-Micromotors,” FAULHABER Miniature Drive Systems, Switzerland, accessed Dec. 3, 2015, http://www.faulhaber.com/
Symmetry Surgical, 2015, “ Laparoscopic Portfolio,” Symmetry Surgical, Symmetry Surgical, Inc., Antioch, TN, accessed Aug. 2, 2015, http://www.symmetrysurgical.com
Pourghodrat, A. , Nelson, C. , and Oleynikov, D. , 2014, “ Electrohydraulic Robotic Manipulator With Multiple Instruments for Minimally Invasive Surgery,” ASME J. Med. Devices, 8(3), p. 030919. [CrossRef]
Soleimani, M. , 2003, “ Development of a Novel Balloon-Shape Electroactive Polymer (EAP) Actuator,” Master's thesis, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby BC, Canada. http://summit.sfu.ca/item/12153
Cantournet, C. , Desmorat, R. , and Bessona, J. , 2009, “ Mullins Effect and Cyclic Stress Softening of Filled Elastomers by Internal Sliding and Friction Thermodynamics Model,” Int. J. Solids Struct., 46(11–12), pp. 2255–2264. [CrossRef]

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Working principle of the linear actuator (left) and exploded view (right) [25]

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Linear actuator prototype [25]

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Benchtop test setup

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Displacement versus pressure [25]

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Working principle of the vane motor

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Exploded view of the motor [25]

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Experimental testing setup

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Torque versus pressure for a constant flow rate of 4.25 L/min

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Speed–torque characterization

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Laparoscopic grasper prototype [25]

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Free-body diagram of a balloon-based actuation

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Robotic arm 3D model

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

Vane motor 3D model and exploded view

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 14

Fluid-powered robotic arm prototype

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In